-
Posts
19,904 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Buffalo_Stampede
-
-
Just now, Limeaid said:
I apologize. Your English composition is very good and I never realized this.
I’m just joking. lol.
-
What the heck. 2 days ago it was windy, cold, and a couple inches.
-
9 minutes ago, Limeaid said:
No you do not seem to know how statistics and probability works.
It was. I’m very sensitive about not finishing high school.
-
2 minutes ago, Limeaid said:
Now we know why you are called Buffalo_Stampede. You want a stampede of fans to leave Buffalo.
You failed statistics and probability in high school right?
Personal attack.
-
1
-
-
14 minutes ago, Bob Jones said:
Not building a domed stadium is going to be one of the dumbest moves in the history of WNY.
It really is.
-
3
-
-
1 minute ago, GunnerBill said:
It is.
I looked it up!
-
Great coach and great QB.
-
1
-
7
-
1
-
-
You’d be surprised how many people don’t believe extreme heat is dangerous. I would rather play in 0 degree weather than 100 degree.
-
4
-
13
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, GunnerBill said:
I think they have lost confidence in him to an extent and I have long thought that there is a niggling injury. There was a spell in the middle of the year where he could barely get a touchback off a kick off. I know there are times when the Bills kick short intentionally (although they have backed off that this year with half of their elite gunner tandem gone) but there was a spell in the middle of the season where he managed 11 touchbacks in 28 attempts. It has ticked up since then which might suggest he is getting healthier but I'm convinced there has been something going on physically.
Niggling is a real word?
-
3
-
-
Bass is fine.
-
4
-
1
-
1
-
-
58 minutes ago, RunTheBall said:
We will see!
Well It’s 99% chance. I didn’t say 100%.
-
1
-
-
Sounds like Siriani’s seat is scolding hot if he loses. I think they’re going to lose. Eagles are about to implode.
-
1 minute ago, RunTheBall said:
Zero percent chance McD is gone
Less than zero percent chance The Hoodie ends up in Buffalo
99% chance. Pegula is obsessed with Belichick.
-
1
-
-
I saw a rumor that there’s a team in the playoffs secretly ready to go after Belichick. I’m 99% sure it’s the Bills.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
-
2 minutes ago, Ya Digg? said:
He has grown on me, but I’m still not completely sold on him. The play that he injured himself on the other day was just him being dumb
I think he’s a very low IQ player.
-
1
-
-
So as soon as I said this is normal Buffalo weather in mid January it seems Mother Nature took that as a challenge. The weather report keeps getting worse every time I look at it.
-
-
27 minutes ago, BisonMan said:
As others have said, this is really a non-issue. First, there is no benefit to "stop the clock" when the penalty would just give the offense a free down. For example, going Offside intentionally would stop the clock, but it would give the offense the down over, plus 4 yards. If it gave the offense a first down, it's 4 additional downs to run the clock. Most in-play penalties (holding, interference, etc.) also create an automatic first down (again more free plays, more time used). If Ramsey held on the Bills 3rd and 13 to stop the clock, he's a moron.
The situation here is rare when the offense got the first down "legitimately" and the fouls just added additional yards and stopped the clock. The only place this might be a good strategy is if the offense was 3rd and 1 and was the Eagles. You know they're almost automatically going to "tush push" the first down and giving them an additional 4 yards by being Offside helps by stopping the clock. Pretty rare situation.
I do agree that post-play penalties is something to look at. Then the defense already knows the outcome was a 1st down and could draw an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty (i.e. call the ref an #######). I'm actually not sure if those currently stop the clock but competitive teams would have low value players pull that stuff in every game if that did stop it.
There are probably a lot of rules the could have game situational "tweaks" to marginally increase "fairness" like this one. However, making the rules more complicated and more situational doesn't bode well for having better management of games by the refs. More complexity and nuance leads to more mistakes in any situation. The "juice isn't worth the squeeze" to change the rule for this type of somewhat rare situation.Now, fumbling the ball through the endzone....
My 2 cents.
It saves the defense 30-40 seconds. It’s a dumb rule and should be changed to give teams the option of running the clock or declining.
Luckily it didn’t hurt us but it definitely helped Miami.
Imagine if there was 2:30 left when Allen got the first and Miami had no timeouts. Game should be over. Instead the clock stops at 2:30, Bills have to run a play. Miami could get the ball back with 30 seconds or so all because of the rule.
-
5 minutes ago, Big Turk said:
Yes, because a team false starting itself to victory under 5 minutes would be great for the game.
What does a false start have to do with a defensive penalty?
-
7 minutes ago, Straight Hucklebuck said:
Yeah I know the 90 grade from PFF gets referenced a lot.
But when people say he’s played well, I can’t remember a ton of specific plays he’s made this year.
Bills have been “good” against the run, but not among the Top 5.
And I don’t remember much against the pass. He did “sack” Achane on Sunday night.
It must be a matter of he doesn’t miss the tackles that are there, and he gets in the way enough on passing plays.
As long as he has continued to work out and stay in shape for 2-down run stuffing work.
That’s what we need, because he’s been coming off the field on 3rd downs to drop Poyer in the linebacker spot.
I see him whiff in the open field far too often. I don’t know where his grade comes from. At least once a game he dives and completely whiffs on a tackle.
Good against the run? Again, I don’t see it.
-
Just now, wppete said:
I wasnt either but he surprised me this year, he’s played well.I don’t think he has is my point.
-
2
-
-
5 minutes ago, wppete said:
That’s not a good sign for the Dodson injury.
I’m still not a fan of Dodson.
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, YattaOkasan said:
cause after you see someone make the first down you should commit a penalty to stop the clock. its weird but the dolphins benefited from this rule despite being the team that committed the penalty. if we decline the penalty and got the first down on our own we should be able to burn the clock. if we accept the penalty to get the first down then yeah it should stop.
And I’m taking it further. If a ref wanted to influence the outcome they can by throwing a flag and stopping the clock.
Now don’t get me wrong, it was a blatant hold on Miami but you’re telling me Miami didn’t hold another time during the game?
-
1 minute ago, MJS said:
Why is it dumb? It makes sense to me.
Why would it make sense to you? A team should have the option to accept the penalty or not. Not accepting the penalty should run the clock.
-
2
-
4
-
Steelers @ Bills. Monday, January 15th at 4:30pm.
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
Not really that huge losing a CB and WR in 150mph winds and 10 feet of snow.