Jump to content

ArdmoreRyno

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,565

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by ArdmoreRyno

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    18 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

    IF they are visible. they are also a heck of a preventative security measure.

     

    Tweakers don't notice. but real criminals avoid things that get them caught.  like cameras, dogs, Retirees and so on.  Eff, just put a "Beware of ADT" sign and it helps.

     

     

     

     

     

    I have stickers on all sides of my home :)

     

    Yea, meth heads will probably ignore the signs and cameras but once the alarm goes off maybe they'll leave. Then there's nothing of serious value they can grab. Maybe the PS5, 70" screens, etc? I do have a valuable vintage Star Wars collection in my home.. so that's really the only risk. 

     

    I also have a insanely loud and crazy Sheltie that barks A LOT. He gets REAL pissed off when the horses lay down for some reason 😂 But he can see the drive from the gate to the parking area via the front windows (it's right at his height). He will bark at everything. Sorta annoying really, but I love the little guy.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Awesome! (+1) 1

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    40 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

    Never understood the argument for having a zillion cameras on your house unless it’s to catch people that have already done a crime
     

    So you’re telling me that you sit there and monitor those cameras

     

     

     

    Why not? Why not have a firearm just in case something happens? Why not have a first aid kit in your car, just in case of a car accident? Why not have security cameras just in case someone tries to break in? 

     

    Believe it or not, as peaceful as it is in my part of the world... there are a meth heads.  There was a dude who tried to break into a house just 2 miles from me, off the same dirt road. He was caught and is in jail waiting for his court date.  https://johnstoncosentinel.com/2023/10/break-in-results-in-felony-charges-against-tishomingo-resident/

     

    And no, I don't. I get alerted when a human walks past the cameras. I get alerted if a window or door opens. Technology is amazing these days. 

     

    Anything else? 

    2 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

    Still no answer.  come on.

     

    what's the plan.  how would you see it playing out.

     

    How would you drain it. 

     

     

     

     

     

     

    He doesn't have an answer. He and David Hogg just love to scream about taking guns from people, yet have no plan on how that would play out. 

    • Thank you (+1) 1

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    11 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

    I used to collect

     

    Do you know what it makes you a target for

     

    robbery

     

    So what you're telling me... if you collect something, you're a target for being robbed. 

     

    LOL

     

    Dude, I live in a rural Oklahoma town, actually outside that little town on 30+ acres. I have a gated fence with a lot of security. In fact, my house has 8 cameras, mostly outside and a damn good alarm. I have a SECUREIT safe that's bolted to the ground, a safe located in a "cubby hole." You're not getting into it unless you know the code. My sheriff, who is a bad ass VERY pro-2A VERY conservatives guy (beat the ***** out of you before the handcuffs if you've done something really bad, type of LEO) has my gate code and my cell phone. Oh, I also have a 'ranch hand' who is out here 5-6 hours a day working with the horses.

     

    So yea, they could try to break in but good luck. God bless them if they try it when I'm home. 

    • Like (+1) 1

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    13 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    I think u have an anger issue...

     

    do u agree wirth Scalias opinion?  pretty precise words....

     

    I have anger issues because I own firearms and if someone broke into my house to hurt one of the people I love... I'd stop that threat... that means I have "anger issues". 

     

    Well, if that's the case, I guess I do. 🙄

    13 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

    Well, for one thing they can change the rules about honorable discharge is out of the military
     

    I know several people they got honorable discharge is that didn’t deserve them. It’s much easier for the military just to give them a general or an honorable because it’s less paperwork. Got to stop that.

    I don’t think you understand what the word means
     

    Travel outside the United States and then come back and talk to me

     

    right now you’re just ignorant

     

    Ah, so that means more people will fall through the cracks that shouldn't be allowed to own a gun. 

     

    Great start to the conversation on how to stop these shootings. Maybe you can see how complicated it can get?

    • Like (+1) 1

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    Just now, John from Riverside said:

    I’m not a big fan of people turning in their guns I have several myself
     

    Something Hass to be done so that they don’t fall into hands mentally disturbed people who want to hurt others

     

    I completely agree. So how? 

     

    How about law enforcement (both local, state and federal) do their jobs? The guy in Maine was inpatient for 2 weeks, made threats to shoot up a National Guard... the guy in the Texas church shooting, he was dishonorably discharged from the Navy. Both should have not been able to own a firearm. LEO should have gone in and done something about that. 

     

    There are THOUSANDS of gun laws in the country. How many more do we need? How about we enforce the ones we already have first? Start there?

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    6 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

    Literally don’t have that problem here in the United States

     

    You literally don't know what will happen in the future. 

     

    Pointless to argue with you, Joe, Tibs, or any other liberal. The 2A isn't going away. Guns aren't going away... and I'm not turning mine in because I WILL NOT be unable to protect myself or my family. You can do whatever you like. 

    • Haha (+1) 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    Just now, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    Which means you'll lose.  Unless u go palms up to Putin...and you might.  btw, the mIG's won't do y'all much good

     

     

    Can Civilians Own Fighter Jets? In the U.S., purchasing a used fighter jet is legal with the proper licenses and permits. Buyers must demonstrate a valid purpose for the aircraft beyond recreational flying. The aircraft must be demilitarized, which entails disabling its armament.

     

    Again, ever heard of Ukraine? 

     

    Your argument is... it's basically pointless to ever fight a tyrannical government so why bother? Give up your right to protect your life, your families life and your rights? That's what you're wanting. 

     

    Well, some people aren't built that way. I'm not built to give up and lay down. Not going to sit by while Negan bashes my loved one in the head with a bat. You would though. 

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Disagree 1

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    35 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    They really believe that they can win a grassroots modern US revolution.  morons...one word: drones.

    no, i've seen a few episodes of the office.  tooo high brow for me.  I prefer the BBC original version.

     

    Ever heard of Ukraine? 

     

    Good to know good old Joe (Beta male) will just jump in the dug up ditch before he's shot in the back of the head. 

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    36 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    so where does it stop?  grenade launchers?  nukes?  what's your limit?

     

    Well, you can legally own grenade launchers, tanks, etc. Most people don't have the means (money) to buy them, or go through that process. You can also own MiG-29 fighter jet if you can put down the money for it. 

     

    The nukes argument is ridiclous. Good luck building one. 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% on the planet don't have the ability to do that and that is illegal (18 USC 831). 

     

    450,000,000 firearms in the United States. Most are semi-automatic. We have a 2A to protects our rights. Not your feelings. Sorry.

     

    (as for my limit? It's what the wife will allow, or doesn't notice... but I own a nice number of firearms. None have hurt a soul... and I keep checking every day if they have... since it's the guns. Right?)

    40 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

    Yup, because its so difficult for murderers to get guns in this country, hup hup 

     

    Again, if you think it's harder for someone to get sinus medication than a gun, you're a moron.

    • Disagree 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    11 hours ago, BillStime said:


    I don’t take advice from nut jobs who would willingly sacrifice their own flesh and blood because they prioritize their guns.

     

     

     

    Yea, "I don't want to understand how buying a firearm actually works... I'll just share cartoons that I'll believe are true." 

     

    You're an idiot. You probably get your firearm info from The View. 

    10 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    What does your avatar mean.  Be clear...and there is no need in a civilized society for semi automatic weapons in the hands of the nonmilitary citizens.  Give me a reason.   To kill libs like me when the civil war starts?

     

    My avatar? Prison Mike? What... are you 104? 

     

    Let me be clear, IDGAF what you think. 95% of ALL GUNS in America are semi-auto. Nearly EVERY handgun is semi-auto. We hunt with them. We sports shoot with them. But most importantly, we have them for PROTECTION. From evil people and a tyrannical government.  That's why we have a 2A. There are your reasons to own a firearm. 

     

    "lETs GiVE gUNs oNLY tO ThE goVErnMEnt" 

     

    Idiot. 

     

     

    • Haha (+1) 1
    • Thank you (+1) 2

    Mass Shooting in Lewiston Maine

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    Just now, Roundybout said:


    Name one country where shootings like this happen multiple times a year. 

     

    Violence does happen all over the world. Knife attacks in Japan for example... truck massacre in France (killed almost 100). The fact is, we are the only country in the world with a 2A. That's not going away. Ever. 

     

    450 million firearms in the country. Not going to bottle up that box. 

     

    We need to figure out why these things happen more often than they did pre-Columbine. We had Austin (clock tower), Edmond (OK post office), the Luby's shooting... again, something changed with our society around 1999/2000. What was it? 

    1 minute ago, Roundybout said:


    On the first page is a discussion of how he’s a mentally sick domestic abuser who just got out of the mental hospital. 

     

    And it's gone straight to the topic of guns... has it not? 

    2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

    Pro-genocide! Pro-Gun! 

     

    Hand in hand! 

     

    So being pro-gun is being pro-genocide. 

     

    Dude. LOL

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...