Milanos Milano

Lol we have people literally saying Kincaid is Kelce esque. It works both ways. He isn’t, he’s had his chance to prove it last year.

Just include their high schools stats, I mean it matters afterall. It does no good to include stats from an inferior program.

Well congratulations to those scouts. I let the stats speak for themselves.

I refuse to count SD, I’m only comparing equal footing programs. Utah production was the same as Mayer’s ND production. Facts

That’s fair, I don’t have any issue with that. My concern is WR2 and have said the Kincaid is a brilliant pick IF Beane has a plan at WR2, someone like a Hopkins makes this pick totally logical.

Context. I’ve stated from the very beginning it’s a Gronk vs Gesicki situation to where I believe I’d rather have a Gronk style TE.

Mayer is a 3 down capable player. With equal receiving skills.

This is a lie. They had the same receiving production. Where do people get this from.

I said he was Gesicki

Where did I say we would regret it? All I said was Mayer > Kincaid.

I never said Kincaid was woeful, or bad.

19 TDs is a flat out lie. Kincaid had 16 TDs , the same Mayer had in 2 years. Im not counting Kincaid prior junk years because of a bad program. On a 2 year basis comparison, Mayer and Kincaid were equal receiving options.

Mayer had 3 years at 18 (9 this year 7 the year before)Kincaid had 16 in 2 years try again.

This is just flat out false. Michael Mayer had more yards and TDs than Kincaid. You guys are crazy.

I like Kincaid as a big slot option. I’m not going to deny that. I just think this move makes more sense if it’s paired with a WR2.

Only in Bills universe could 809 yards 9 TDs be “not in the same league” as 890 yards 8 TDs.

800+ yards and 7+ TDs the last 2 years. I swear this place is unreadable with the rahrah riders.

The problem is Davis is not good. Teams will just put a good corner on Kincaid because Davis never commands a double team. You can’t put a good corner on Kincaid if Hopkins is on our team, which is my entire point. Kincaid is a brilliant pick if Beane has something else planned.

I still feel like this move doesn’t move the needle unless it’s paired with a Hopkins trade. A big bodied slot guy only makes sense if you have 2 very good WRs who are clogging up the field. Personnel wise, you can’t guard Kincaid with a LB, he will destroy you. That’s why Kincaid would be an A+ pick if Beane has more to this plan.

Again I don’t dislike Kincaid. He will likely produce in our system. My only concern is WR2, has been since day 1. I don’t understand how a slot “TE” is much better than a slot WR that already showed promise in Shakir. It only makes sense if we land Hopkins. The reason why I say that, is because with Diggs and Hopkins commanding a ton, nobody is going to be able to guard a big slot guy with Diggs and Hopkins on the field.

Ask Beane, he said if Kincaid wasn’t there he would have traded down. Who would he have traded down with?

It’s possible. I don’t necessarily hate the Kincaid pick and want to put that out there. I just don’t see it helping much unless we have a plan at WR2. If we can’t land Hopkins, then the Kincaid pick seems a little strange. We already have Shakir primed for the slot. I would have been happier with a trade down into the 2nd round. Grabbing Avila and then grabbing Hyatt with a packaged up move. Avila/Hyatt > Kincaid/ Dawand Jones

I didn’t say he was a bust, I said he’s a Gesicki.

I will cut Beane a lot of slack if there is more to this plan. Kincaid makes a million times more sense if we end up landing Hopkins. Diggs Hopkins Kincaid That grouping would make so much more sense rather than a Diggs Davis Kincaid

The league also clearly disagreed on Brady for 6 rounds. Also clearly disagreed on AJ Brown, etc etc.