daz28

Nobody minds anyone criticizing the team, but these takes seem like people put up post it notes of the comment before the game, and are just inserting them after bad plays. It's really gross

$700M dead cap hit

Yeah. If it was an intentional misdirection, that would be strange. The strangest part is it ended up a TD pass.

You never see anything like that. Was it intentional???

3 lineman ran the wrong play, and he STILL throws a TD pass

Dawesome Knox. Ohes noes

Lucky that was uncatchable

Replay didn't look good. doubtful return

Great hand fighting Edward

Off balance, and well covered

I'd have been ill if this was LV vs DAL all over again

Man oh Manny

I meant like in the next 5 minutes.

Get well soon Tre

Way too many dropped balls by backs costs us

Gabeday Davis

Super Mario 2

I imagine if we had someone else with 5.0 yds per carry, he would get a shot.

According to a Raider fan there was A LOT of contact. I saw little to none

Whoever hits the Covid lottery is also a factor.

Could you provide even one example of an American leftist that shows they don't believe in private property rights? I would hope this is just extreme hyperbole.

I'm saying that becasue there was a shot to the back, that could be a reason to want to have a jury trial. I'm not arguing it wasn't self-defense. All along I've said I felt he may have been somewhat negligent. The jury did not know many of the facts in determining that: 1) if he said in that recording that he wished he had his AR to shoot shoplifters; 2) Was it legal for him to be carrying the weapon; 3) Did the video show him pointing a weapon at people before the shootings It's almost like he knew that if he used the weapon he brought to protect himself, it could put him in a very precarious situation right after. I'm sure he just ran, because he was scared, but that seems to be what precipitated the actions of people afterwards. I'm not going to blame Kyle for that. That falls squarely on the shoulders of the city, which couldn't police itself.

I don't know that it's "obvious self-defense" when one of the people was shot in the back. That alone raises questions, and letting a jury decide it probably wasn't a bad idea What's funny is most of the people saying that this case shouldn't have even made it to court are the same ones saying that he should sue Biden, when there's pretty clearly no defamtion case. #hypocritenation

Politicians are responsible for all of this, and in many more ways than we can even begin to think of. Can she prove he's not a white supremecist? That's like trying to prove you don't like the smell of farts.

They are not clearly 2 totally different things. I brought up the Bernhard Goetz trial, and if you're not familiar, I suggest you look into it. He was acquitted even though one of the men he shot was cowering in fear when he was shot, which is as clear cut of an example of not being self-defense that it's laughable. The second statement is PATENTLY false. Many, many arrests were made. This is from Fox news, which is why I was surpirised you never saw it: Federal prosecutors have announced the arrests of more than six dozen people on charges ranging from murder to arson to looting in connection with rioting that grew out of protests over the death of George Floyd in the past five weeks. The cities did do a horrible job, but so did you. Your statement was both a bold and bald faced lie. The judges incompetence has left citizens believing that it is indeed legal to carry at age 17. A fact which could have very easily been discovered had he not been incompetent. People get very confused as to what defamation is. Both sides should be held accountable for propoganda. Fox has openly argued that people shouldn't believe them.