Jumpsuit Jim
-
Posts
314 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Jumpsuit Jim
-
-
I love nicknames. Especially contrived ones that have no basis in anything. Just pulled from the ether. “Show Gun Offense”. So cool. Maybe make it Japanese. Shogun Offense. The kids will really get behind it.
Maybe be someday I’ll read the thread instead of just the title.
- 1
-
-
Steve Tasker? I hear he’s being considered for the HoF.
- 1
-
I have it from an inside source that Tasker will be going in to the NFL Hall of Fame on September 5th of this year. He took part in purchasing a Groupon.
- 1
-
How about “The Front Seven”? Or maybe “Defensive Front”.
“The Bills’ Defensive Front Seven”.
-
6 minutes ago, ngbills said:
Just because Beane didn’t draft a WR does not mean that he knows better than us or anyone else. It is just the choice he made.
i think this was a decent WR class. As we saw only a few 1st round talents but a ton of potential. Guys like Butler in the 4th or Harmon in the 6th, just to name a few. I would have took a shot at one of those guys.
Saying that Bean doesn’t know better than us is like saying the physician doesn’t know more than us because we read Web MD everyday.
And then you follow it up by calling this a decent WR class? I think.....
wow.
- 7
- 1
-
We loaded the WR room with mediocrity over free agency so we wouldn’t have to reach for mediocrity in the draft.
Somehow, that seems like a well thought out plan.
- 1
-
The wideout crop in this year’s draft is weak overall. That is why we hit the bin big time in free agency. There was no need to reach for mediocrity when we could get the mediocrity during free agency and use the draft for high quality.
Free agency where the draft is weak. Draft the year’s strong positions (we got a top 3 overall DLineman at #9. Sick). Who cares that we missed DK?
- 1
-
40 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:
Antonio Brown went in the 6th. Colston went in the 7th. Thielen wasn’t drafted.
Good point.
Here is one for you to consider: Butler isn’t Brown. Nor is he Colston or Thielen. Just because it has happened in the past doesn’t mean it will happen in the future when every variable has been changed. Everything is different. It can’t be compared, only used as data for this year, this team, this pick. Otherwise, every team would be picking a quarterback at 199.
-
I really don’t understand this aversion to trading up. The whole “We lose draft picks” idea, to me, is a faulty concept.
At at the beginning of training camp, every team has 90 players. By trading up, a higher percentage of those 90 players are higher draft picks (obvious, but needs to be said). If we keep or trade back, we don’t get more than the 90 players to start. We just end up with a less talented group of 90 football players to choose from.
When the quantity is limited (capped at 90 to start, 53 on the roster, 46 active, 11 on the field) quality should be the goal.
-
Harry. Wow. That hurts.
- 2
-
There are only two things I hate: Intolerance and the Dutch.
- 1
-
I guess we should change the motto to “BPA unless it’s a TE in the first round because they are never worth that high of a pick.”
So stated the OP. And that stance is ludicrous.
- 1
-
If the drop off in talent from about #8 to #32 is negligible, why would a team want to give up so much capital to move up when the return in player quality isn’t there? Trade this year’s first and give up next year’s first for whom? Who would they take. One of the 10 similarly graded D linemen? A cornerback? A quarterback who just might have an Andy D type career at best?
Saying “Trade Back” is awesome. Finding someone who will pay a price to get to #9 is unlikely.
-
25 minutes ago, aristocrat said:
No tight end taken top ten has ever lived up to it
What do past drafts have to do with anything? If past drafts were the gold standard for player evaluation, teams would be clamoring to grab the next most successful quarterback of all time at pick number 199.
Last year’s draft was last year. Past drafts are in the past. This year’s players are this year’s players.
- 1
- 1
-
My biggest argument FOR drafting a tight end in the first round was aptly stared by an earlier poster: The NFL is becoming a passing league. Having that big, fast tight end that DBs can’t take down one on one and LBs can’t run with is a vital aspect of today’s short yard and red zone offense. Vital enough to spend a first round pick on.
As as far as taking a few years to learn the position, so what? For the most part, only running backs are plug-and-play. And their importance is diminishing. And does anybody really believe that the high quality tight ends who have worked through the learning curve and are now hitting on all cylinders would ever be allowed to hit the open market? Would Philly really let Ertz walk? And would you be willing to pay the price to get him? Especially when TJ will probably be better than him?
in this draft, I can easily see three tight ends being taken in the first round. I can also see a tight end being taken before any wideouts are taken. Welcome to the new NFL.
And for the record, I would be happy with 5 or so different guys at 9. TJ is one of them. DK, not so much, but I would live with it.
- 1
-
So the thesis of this post is “Tight Ends aren’t worth a first round pick because they rarely develop into elite 1st round football players before their rookie contract runs out”.
Most football analysts will say that the easiest, most plug-and-play out of the box from college to pro position is running back. I have also heard football people saying that one of the hardest transitions (outside of quarterback) is O Line because collegiate football is so different offensively than pro.
So if we apply the original thesis to all positions, we should take running backs in the first round and offensive linemen in the latter rounds.
I find the OP’s thesis to be a recipe for failure. Null and void.
- 2
-
Thanks. Nice write up.
It’s a deep defensive front draft when a first round (top half of?) guy like Brian Burns doesn’t even make the top 5 at his position.
-
1 hour ago, ColoradoBills said:
FWIW, the real offseason starts tomorrow.
...but I thought we had already won the offseason...Hey. Are you guys just making this stuff up?
-
If I remember the in depth Bills’ business plan that a previous poster slipped to me correctly, this renovation/construction is referred to as “Phase 1 Step 5: Moving To Batavia”.
-
4 hours ago, billsfan_34 said:
Horrible- sickening- sad! What ever happened to protecting women, children and elderly? Our society is messed up.
Side bar- GF looks like a meth head- pot holes all over her face if you look close.
It is horrible. Sickening. And sad. But This isn’t a result of our “messed up society”. Women, children, and the elderly have been neglected, abused, beaten, and killed by societies across all human history.
Society isn’t to blame. The person doing this is to blame.
- 1
- 1
-
2 minutes ago, nucci said:
who's your friend and why can't he/she ask?
very cool
Because Jerr... Because he...OR she...we just don’t know...wants to remain anonymous.
Im sure he...OR she...is stewing over it while riding to work in a helicopter. If that really is what that person may or may not do.
-
There is still lots of sexual tension between Ross and Rachel. Phoebe was a surrogate mother for her brother. Monica and Chandler are doing well. Joey may or may not move to California to pursue a spinoff.
- 2
-
...but is it a better training facility than the one in Dallas? Asking for a friend.
- 2
- 3
Combining my 2 favorite teams in 1 photo
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Yup. I’m a big fan of Star Wars and Delta Airlines, too.