Jump to content

FearLess Price

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,524
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by FearLess Price

  1. 10 minutes ago, corta765 said:

    So bleacher report released a fun article today highlighting where they think QB's are going next season and the potential carousel that could be spun in motion.

    (http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2748670-early-predictions-for-the-wild-2018-nfl-qb-carousel)

     

    They have the Bills acquiring Sam Bradford. My response: Puke. Sam Bradford is the definition of average at the QB position and would only solidify more 7-9 8-8 seasons. This season has basically been one with zero expectations. Next season though I would like to start seeing some growth one way or another towards the future. I would rather see the Bills draft a QB and have him start even if we have growing pains, then settle for a ceiling of 9-7 with Bradford.

     

    The Bills have done a nice job acquiring picks, building a bit of a base this season, and over performing so far which if were lucky might result in the playoffs. This is not the time for Buffalo to settle with an option like Bradford.

     

    Im there too. Draft our 1st round rook, get an oc that will coach him up right and let him start next season if hes ready and wins in tc.

  2.  I doubt McBean goes through this draft without taking a qb. 

     

    The amount of talent available and its a position of need.

     

    Who we pick up in FA and what we do with Dennison is gonna tell us everything we need to know about who theyre gonna draft

    21 minutes ago, Tatonka68 said:

    If Cousins is "ALL" that why is he available? How many Super bowls has he played in, how about playoff games? 

     

     

    I dont get the cousins love either. Just cuz a qb throws for 300 yards doesnt mean hes a franchise quality qb. Once he lost his main wr/te core his play has leveled off and he seems to choke in important games.

  3. 15 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

     

    Probably true. But is there any question this offense now is producing the worst results with Tyrod we’ve seen in 3 seasons? 

     

    It really seems like scheme. We all know Tyrod is not a good pocket passer. Hes best when on the move and a threat to run using option playa out of a spread formation or pistol. I guess Dennison cant or doesnt want to scheme to his strengths and rather force him into a style hes not good at

     

  4. Just now, 26CornerBlitz said:

     

    Tyrod's history against the Dolphins is actually very good: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/T/TaylTy00/gamelog/?opp_id=mia

     

    Ive been trying to point this out but some people just dont wanna hear it. He always balls out vs miami. This game is more on Dennison. Tyrod has proven he can play well vs the phins. Can Dennison call a game that gets us a W is the real question 

  5. 16 minutes ago, Bills Pimpin' said:

    Who is ball washing Peterman? Saying Peterman is a better option than Taylor is not ball washing anyone. No one is putting Peterman in the HOF, just a notch or 2 above a bad QB who put up historically bad numbers against the Patriots 2 weeks ago, quit, put a towel over his head and got carted off the field like a little B word. He is done in Buffalo. Only a concussion is going to put him back on the field. 

     

    There both not franchise saving QBs. I think Tyrod is better and the team plays better when hes in there. History shows this is the case. You disagree. Its coo homie. I call it ball washing cuz no evidence supports he plays better.

  6. 3 minutes ago, Buffalo30 said:

    Guy, the Chargers are on a big winning streak and scoring over 30 in almost every contest and crushing teams.  The Pats haven't looked so great lately.  They just got beat by Miami yesterday and only scored 23 against us.  One team is playing their best and the other hasn't lately.  The Pats didn't score a ton on us last game.  It was a winnable game if we had any offense...that's all I'm saying haha.  Good day sir

    Lmao dude.

    In no universe would the chargers beat the pats this season. Im willing to bet on it right now. Dont make excuses for the rook, he wasnt ready, it was abad coaching decision to put him out there vs our ex oc in hostile territory. Incredibly stupid.

     

    3 minutes ago, Lfod said:

    We beat the Colts with a rookie 5th rounder and a 3rd string. In the same fashion we usually win games. Just barely with a solid defence. 

     

    I get that Tyrod is the better chance to win but it's by a hair bro. Let me point you to the Panthers game that all we needed was an offence. Even the Patriots we're beatable with an offence.

     

    Exactly, he is better. Period. I understand fans wanting to see what the rook can develop into. I jus want to win and i think tyrod gives us a better chance to win over NP. Thats all it is.

     

     

     

    At the end of the day we all want to win, regardless whos under center.

    4 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

    The bet stands as is. 

     

    5 INT's in a half because that is what people are implying.    

    You want in PM me.

     

    Your so confident in the rook then whats  the problem with 3 ints a game? Or maybe you think hes gonna throw those and have you ballwashing tygod the terrible :lol: :lol

  7. 1 minute ago, Buffalo30 said:

    Peterman had a nice drive down the field against the Patriots down to the 1.  That wasn't the point though.  As for the Chargers, they've been playing lights out.  They've been spanking everyone.  During this win streak, yeah I think they've been playing better football than the Pats have played the last few games.  

     

    Dude are you really telling me the pats willmlpse to the chargers if they play them next week? Do you wanna bet who goes further in the afc playoffs? Dont make me bet on the pats to prove your campaigning. I hate the pats.

     

    4 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

    I'll take a bet that if Nate throws another 5 INT's in a half

    I will  be the biggest TT asskisser  that there is for a week.  

     

    You will have to be a pro Nate asskisser for the same duration. 

     

    Any takers? 

     

    Make it 3 ints a game if over 25 attemps and 2 ints for anything under 24 attempts and your on donky kong.

     

     

    6 minutes ago, Bills Pimpin' said:

    Doesn't matter. When Peterman can't go this week and Taylor starts, win or lose, I hope he gets benched for the Pats game. Taylor can not beat the Pats in Gillette. 

    I actually hope NP starts vs the Pats so posters like you can eat crow. We all know tyrod isnt leading a 30point comback and winning a game with no help from the running game. Some of us that dont ballwash petermen know he isnt gonna do any better.

  8. 7 minutes ago, Buffalo30 said:

    When we started Peterman, some of the defensive players sounded happy including Micah Hyde.  

     

    Peterman played well in the snow sunday and had some beautiful throws to Benjamin. I just don't think Tyrod has been good enough all year to put him back in.  3 points in a big game where the defense held Brady to 23 points with Gronk...unacceptable

    Dude I'm just commenting about what the thread is about...the thread is literally about if both are healthy.  That's all I was doing haha

     

    Those were really nice throws. Even NP couldnt score vs the Pats that game so thats another fallacy. You cant infer what players say and use it to support your take bc all comments have to be pc. You really think anyone on the team is gonna outright say they thought it was stupid to bench tyrod for a 5 int rookie? Hell no. You dont throw your teammates under the bus no matter how many picks they throw in the 1st half of a big game with the playoffs on the line. And wake up call LAC is not as good as NE. You don't actually believe that nonsense do you?

  9. 1 minute ago, Bills Pimpin' said:

    Tyrod is a bad QB who is only getting the start because Peterman is concussed. He is bad because he won't throw the football. One of the main reasons the Buffalo Bills won the game in the snow is because Nathan Peterman threw 2 great balls to Benjamin and Webb threw one great throw to DT. I am not confident Taylor would have thrown either one of those balls because the receivers were covered. You can pull up Taylors stats from last year, pull up Peterman stats from LA (possibly the best team in the AFC right now),blame Dennison, blame McD, blame everyone except Tyrod but Peterman is the better QB for the rest of the year. 

    Taylor had his chance at home against NE and failed on an epic level. I hope Peterman gets his chance in 2 weeks.

     

    Lmao. So how come NP didnt start vs the Cheifs when he was healthy?

     

    Hypotheticals are stupid you dont know what wouldve happened if tyrod started. DT had a lot of separation and tyrod actually trusts him to make plays so thats a fallacy right there.

  10. 6 minutes ago, dneveu said:

     

    I'd personally not start a post-concussion rookie with no game prep or practice.

     

     

    Thats a really good point. He wasnt ready to start vs LAC.  The perfect game to ease him in was the Colts game (before we knew it would be snow city). They threw the poor kid out there too early, now he has tha game hanging over him,  hope he can push through it. Just dont want our playoff chances taking the hit of him getting his confidende back.

  11. 26 minutes ago, GG said:

     

    And yet the Bills have a better record at this point of the season than in 2015 & 2016, even without all the "stars" they let go

     

    Yeah isnt that some sht?

     

    The results of this team playing beyond their talent on defense doesnt mean we didnt lose talent with sll those moves. Just look at how those players are doing for their respective teams. 

  12. 1 minute ago, Buffalo30 said:

    Alex Smith is ten times better than Tyrod...the first half of the year he was in the MVP conversation lol.  That is just a horrid comparison to me.  I prefer to see what we have in the rookie than watch Tyrod's 3 and outs.  Kaepernick led San Fran a few years ago into the SB after his first few starts...not saying Peterman would do that but to say never...

     

    And you honestly think the wide receivers are good with Tyrod at QB?  He doesn't throw to them often at all.  He's too scared to make a mistake to win us any kind of important game

     

    So you dont wanna make the playoffs, youd rather watch a rookie who will lose his starting job to our 1st round qb next season, get his feet wet completing more passes to the opposing team than ours? Ok i get it.

     

    I disagree, id rather watch tyrod play and a half a chance get us into the playoffs n break the drought.

     

    End of convo. There both not good QBs at this point in time (NP) and scheme (TT).

     

    You want to ball wash petermen go watch his college career games.

     

    Id rather win. Hopefully we draft a franchise QB in this draft and we can start winning vs big teams.

  13. Just now, Buffalo30 said:

    I don't understand the backing of Tyrod in a big game like this.  We had a big game against the Pats two weeks ago and what did he do???  3 points, 65 yards, 50% completion percentage and an INT...

    Just now, Buffalo30 said:

    I don't understand the backing of Tyrod in a big game like this.  We had a big game against the Pats two weeks ago and what did he do???  3 points, 65 yards, 50% completion percentage and an INT...

     

    He didn't show up and hasn't in important games over his career...I'd rather see if the young kid can take a pretty good performance in horrid conditions and improve on it.  Tyrod has come up empty way too many times this year.  The defense and run game has saved his behind on most of the wins.  Peterman please...I want to know what the kid has.  If he sucks...we may go 7-9 and have a better draft pick.  If he plays well though...he may lead us into the playoffs.  Either way...that's good for me.  No need to see any more of Tyrod IMO

     

    More fallacies to support your take. Smh.

     

    Actually the big game was vs the chiefs. We all knew we were gonna lose vs the pats. Stop acting like we had a chance there, we arent that good as a team yet. NP almost threww 2 picks in his limited time, had he started it wouldve been a 3 int fiasco and we all know it. Tyrod usually balls out vs the dolphins and he balled out on monday night vs the Seahawks, those were both huge games and the good tyrod showed up. In his present state np is not a better qb than tyrod. Maybe in a few years but not rite now. And rite now we have a game to win so let the best man play. Idc about nps upside, we can explore that when eliminated and let him battle it out with the rookie we draft in the 1st round this year. 

  14. 22 minutes ago, Buffalo30 said:

    For one half?  That's not a full chance at all man.  If we give up on a player after one half, we might as well not even have a team.  One half????  He's a rookie...

    I think giving up on a rookie after one half is incredibly dumb.  Tyrod had 2 and a half years and this guy gets one half????  

    And they should be excited about a veteran that's scored 3 points multiple times this year?  Your whole defense of Tyrod is looking to last year's play...this is a new team and Tyrod looks like hot garbage in it.  He's shown me just how limited he is in his abilities this year.  3 points in a few big games this year....that's good enough for you?  Well it's not for me.  Peterman had a bad half and that's all he gets?  Rookies can get better ya know.  Veterans on the team also want to see us be able to throw the ball, Tyrod can't do that.  Why do you think it looks like the defense gives up once we get down by more than 1 score...they know Tyrod can't get them back in it.  Do you think the wide receivers want to see Tyrod out there?  I don't think so.

     

     

    Oh so youre a mind reader now? You know who the WRs want at qb? :lol::lol:

    Foh with that. Alex smith has had plent of bad games this year do you see his team having team meetings to start mahomes? The team had a meeting after LAC and they decided they want Tyrod to start, took it to mcderm and Tyrod started vs the cheifs and we won. NP doesnt win that game, hes not ready yet. Our QB roster needs serious upgrading but starting NP is just gonna add more Ls in the win column. The fact Tyrod was more effective last year with a worse defense speaks volumes to how bad Dennisons playcalling and square peg round hole scheme has been this season. If were gonna lose id rather lose watching a few cool sandlot highlight plays from Tyrod than watch a 5th round rookie who will NEVER lead this team to the SB get his feet wet. No offense to NP, its just preference. They both arent gonna be 'the man' but as annoying as Tyrods games are ill take those over NPs epic meltdowns

  15. On 12/11/2017 at 1:38 AM, Hapless Bills Fan said:

     

    Wait, I'm confused

     

    Ragland somehow could not absorb our playbook and scheme but when shipped off to KC at the end of training camp, he soaked it up like a sponge?

     

    Something's wrong with that picture.

     

    5 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

     

    I'm feeling slack this am so I'm not going to do it, but I think one could make a pretty good team from players McDermott and Beane have let walk

     

    Its amazing how players we let go on off and def go on to have much better seasons on other teams. You could argue they are on teams with better qbs in terms of wrs and teams with better coaching in terms of dt, lb, and cb. I really dont like having coaches that can't adjust schmes to fit rosters. 

     

    Like they said tho.. "trust the process"

    • Like (+1) 1
  16. Just now, Buffalo30 said:

    Excuse me...I did not say it was all his fault but thank you for changing my words.  I said that he takes fault at times as well.  If he didn't hold onto the ball so long, he wouldn't be in as much pressure.  Why do you think they want him to get rid of it faster?  Any QB that holds onto the ball as long as he does will always be under pressure a lot.  

     

    The oline played its worst game against the Chargers.  They have one of the best pass rushes in the game so it makes sense.  That's another area we need to improve but yes Tyrod contributes when he holds onto the ball too long.  Look at Jared Goff against the Eagles, held onto the ball way too long several times in the game and the pressure got to him.  Get rid of the ball...but Tyrod is too conservative to do so.

     

    None of us know if Peterman will be better or not.  His first college game he did the same thing, had a horrible game.  He ended up with a pretty good career.  I'd rather see him in the lineup than Tyrod who won't even attempt to make a pass if a receiver isn't wide open.  

     

    The o lines worse game was vs the jets actually. With the qbs we have on roster tyrod gives us the best chance to win. Period. Idc about nps celing bc were gonna draft a qb in the 1st round this draft. You can throw the rook in when we get to 8 losses. Too many vets on the team want to win, not sit around and wait for a 5 int rookie to get his feet wet. 

  17. 9 hours ago, Buffalo716 said:

     

    I mean you could watch tons of football without being fans of the team lol

     

    as a buffalonian I can say with 100% certainty that I've never met a buffalonian who also cheers for the jets 

     

    ive met buffalonians who root for the jets and patriots but they also didn't like the bills lol

     

    I am of a different breed entirely. A human not constrained by societal norms. Maybe not human...

×
×
  • Create New...