100DollarBills
-
Posts
592 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by 100DollarBills
-
-
2 minutes ago, HiddenInLight said:
You do realize that we can still afford bell right?
Maybe, but it would have been better to just have signed Bell and Morse. And used the leftover money on another OL.
Just now, HiddenInLight said:Marshawn Lynch
A long time ago.
-
2 minutes ago, Mark80 said:
The best teams get their elite talent via the draft and retain them. They don't pay an extra 50% on guys because they are paying the FA premium rates.
When was the last time we drafted an elite WR or RB. We suck at it.
-
Just now, RyanC883 said:
Morse over any of them.
Morse has not allowed a sack since 2015. Not average.
I left Morse out because we can sign him and Bell. The 3 guys I listed could have paid Bell.
-
Multiple average players is why we are perpetually 7-9 or 9-7
-
High priced talent or multiple subpar talent?
-
1 minute ago, zevo said:
Except there is
Show me.
-
1 minute ago, John from Riverside said:
Some of you seriously need to learn football........
Let me know when Beasley and John Brown are putting up a 1,000 apiece like we actually need.
-
Brown is virtually Foster and Beasley is virtually Jones. There is no upgrade.
-
4
-
-
1 minute ago, quinnearlysghost88 said:
Beasley has 20 more yards and 4 fewer TDs than Zay last year. This makes zero sense.
This is why we are the Bills. Can’t land AB or Bell so we sign scraps.
-
2
-
1
-
-
Bills love perpetual #3 WRs. Wastage of money
-
2
-
-
Just now, BillsFan2313 said:
They aren't trash, but ok
They aren’t that much better than what we already have. Zay and Foster put up nearly similar numbers to these jokers. I’d rather have Bell than Beasley or Brown.
-
Just now, BillsFan2313 said:
How did they "blow their load"? Did you see what Funchess, Crowder and Humphries got? Did you not want to address WR? They are paying market price
I’d rather draft WRs than pay for trash WRs
-
Bills just blew their load on Brown and Beasley. So prob no on Bell. Lame
-
1
-
-
Bell reportedly signing with 1 of 32 teams soon. You heard it here first.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:
This literally means nothing.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, BuffAlone said:
?
I take this as bad news for Buffalo. But could be cryptic for Raiders.
-
Get Bell and keep Shady and go hard on the line. Ground and pound until Allen can throw wide open bombs.
-
I’m perfectly fine paying top dollar to put Bell and Shady on this team for this year. It allows Allen to mature another year, gives us another year to find WRs for Allen and gives the new OL time to gel together.
-
Just now, ddaryl said:
we are not keeping him in this scenario IMO. We are nto paying a RB huge money for 25% workload. He will be replaced, possibly packaged in a deal soon IMO
Either way, I’m not against it.
-
Just now, Putin said:
Thanks !!
So he’s still young and he had a year off ,
He would be our star RB for the next 3 years. I like it.
-
1
-
-
Just now, ddaryl said:
Nobody is going to keep Shady on this team for the money he makes to run 25% of the time
We have money to spend and Shady isn’t going to return the value we can get from him sharing carries with Bell.
-
Line up Bell and Shady in the backfield. Fake handoff too Shady and dump it off to Bell or fake dump it Bell and hit a WR deep.
-
2 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:
Man... if it's "judicious" of Beane to go this hard after the 2 most obviously expensive FAs out there, what would a rash decision actually look like for him?
Guess they're thinking seriously about cutting Shady, despite saying otherwise.
There is room for Bell and Shady. That’s a very dangerous backfield, especially if we can sign Williams and draft a guy like Jonah.
-
1
-
-
Bell 70% carries
McCoy 25% carries
Gore 5% short yardage carries
i wouldnt mind that at all.
-
1
-
Talent vs Multiple low level players?
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
It’s 20 million worth spent. He would open up the passing game like no other.