Jump to content

100DollarBills

Community Member
  • Posts

    592
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 100DollarBills

  1. Had a decent game. There was some very bad decisions from him as well as some very good throws. Ala Rosen Last week. And Darnold week 1.

    Yeah it was ok, but TCU plays decent defense, first real test this year for Rudolph. Still an accomplishment to have over 300 yards passing. I don't really like his clapping pre-snap, maybe NFL coaches can work on that. Although he made some bad decisions, he was still able to keep his team in the game, which is saying something because his defense is terrible.

  2.  

    Geezus, you are still at it with all this over the top, over exaggeration non sense? I already called it out before, but I am pretty sure you are Jeffismagic. Its the same garbage he spewed, your created your account here conveniently the same time Jeffismagic got banned at the Sabres board for ranting all the same Tyrod nonsense as well.

     

    Go root for Mahomes.

    I've never had an account on these boards before. I long time ago in another board but not this one. I can never get behind TT, he is barely a NFL QB, same as EJ and Fitz. I can't wait until 2018 draft and we can attempt to draft a real QB.

  3.  

    does he get hit so hard this year during one of his non-pressure panic-runs that he spends two weeks sitting on the floor rocking back and forth going "eeeeeee.......eeeeeeeeeeeee.....eeeeeeeeeeeeee"

    No, his QB play is so rancid, he won't be asked to return. McBean and Sean will get their guy in the 2018 draft.

  4. Over Rudolph, Mayfield, Faulk? I find that hard to believe. I watched Rudolph last week and I thought he looked really good. I wasn't a fan of his before this season, mostly because of the offense they run, but he's really looking like a pro QB out there. I watched him move around the pocket and look off a couple of receivers before going to his 3rd option on the other side. Scouts notice that kind of stuff. Maybe he hasn't taken snaps under center or called plays in the huddle but everything else he does looks the part

    Rudolph is very good, he goes through progressions quite well, and he steps up and throws in the pocket, but isn't afraid to throw on the run. He has improved his accuracy and completition percentage is great.

  5. Give me Mason Rudolph all day everyday. He has the size, the accuracy, the quick progressions, and step up into the pocket thrower that isn't afraid of throwing it in tight coverage.

     

    Baker Mayfield reminds me of a combination of Fitzpatrick and Flutie, just NO.

     

    Rosen plays and acts like Cutler, I question his love of the game, especially in a place like Buffalo (NO).

     

    Darnold I think is a good QB, but think he is going top 5, and unless we trade up we aren't getting him.

     

    Luke Falk is a very underrated QB because he is always associate with a gimic offense. Let me tell you, it don't matter what offense he is running, he is very very good. Accurate as hell and lighting fast decision making, rarely holds onto the ball long and he steps up in the pocket, he is cool man Luke!

     

    Realistically I would love either Rudolph or Falk.

  6.  

    Even if you think the best fit is to be the ra-ra type guy who acts like he wants to be everyone's friend?

    Ultimately that's McDermott's choice, I don't think that style of management works in the NFL, time will tell. The NFL is very similar to the military. You have a room full of alpha males, you need tough as nails discipline and viewing failure as unacceptable. I don't think excessive positive attitude on 3 and outs is going to earn the respect towards the general.
  7. Such a shame to see many people in this thread rooting for another player to fail. Shame on all of you.

    The guy is obviously delusional, kinda hard to root for somebody who believes contrary to reality.

  8.  

    The verbiage that you use make you appear to be a dictator-type boss. With such a small team, I'm surprised that method of management has been sustainable/effective.

    This method of management doesn't work on everyone, I get to hire my own crew so I know what personalities to look for. As long as there is a possibility of an incentive, you can mold your group's behavior to how you see fit.

  9.  

    How long have you been in charge of the department, and relative to that, how long have each of the eight people under you been under your management?

    10 years, 4 of my key guys have been here 8 yrs, 1 has been here 5, and the other 3 around 2, the last 3 are relatively new because other members weren't cooperating.

    That covets anything from the director of Lockheed's Skunk Works to a shift supervisor at the local McDonalds.

    Manufacturing, that's all I'm saying.

  10. Aah. You like the hoodie!

    Yes, I prefer my coaches like the hoodie, with a dash of emotion when the times are appropriate.

     

    If your turnover rate is low, I bet you pay really, really well.

    We do, we reward high achieving individuals, our discipline/reward system is top notch. If the same high achieving individuals all of a sudden get to comfortable and start underachieving, I take away some of their rewards, if they don't like it I give the 2s their spot.

  11.  

    Kinda curious; how many people report to you in your company, and are they at will or on a contract with your employer?

     

    Next, what defines success in your position, and what methods have you put to work to motivate your team to reach these milestones of success?

    8 people report to me in our department, and we are at will. Success is defined as maximized production and hitting weekly production rate quotas. Methods I use are a stacked employee rating system, I keep 1-3s and 4 and 5s not so much. People who reach our team goals get stock options and RSUs and possible merit raises. If 4s and 5s don't listen to my constructive criticism, I look for replacements.

×
×
  • Create New...