Jump to content

y2zipper

Community Member
  • Posts

    724
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by y2zipper

  1. 2 minutes ago, SirAndrew said:

    So if the punt returner let the ball

    roll inside the five, could he hypothetically just smack the ball out of the end zone for a touchback, and much better field position ? 

     

    Yes, but the danger of course is that the other team can recover a muff, which is why you don't see it often.

    • Like (+1) 1
  2. 2 minutes ago, The Dean said:

     

     

    Miscommunication here. I certainly understand vet rest during the week. This was in response to those who think we should rest a vet/some vets for the ACTUAL GAME, because the competition is deemed so inferior. THAT is what I'm taking exception to. Comprende?

     

    Gotcha there. Buffalo will play guys who are healthy.

  3. 1 hour ago, The Dean said:

     

    "Resting" players in Week #4?  Seriously? That better not be the way this team thinks. This isn't a meaningless game at the end of the year. You don't rest players in week #4.  Now, if you have a player who is injured with something that has a good chance of being exacerbated this week, then maybe you keep him from playing to protect him.  But IMO that has to be legit. If the players can tell the bosses aren't taking the game seriously maybe they don't take it all that seriously either. 

     

    Vet rest is a normal policy for NFL teams throughout the season as far as the injury report goes, especiallu on Tuesday and Wednesday. Some teams have a set day off for vets and it looks like Buffalo rotates through. Most of the time, guys are banged up and they report whatever injury issue there is because you have to report in the NFL. 

     

    They don't need to practice as much as younger players do, so Friday and Saturday injury reports are a much better indicator of what will happen on Sunday.

    • Like (+1) 1
  4. 1 hour ago, HappyDays said:

     

    Eh it was a bad throw, behind the intended receiver. Usually it wouldn't have been a pick but it was still a bad throw. And he had a throw intended for McKenzie that probably should have been picked because he lofted it instead of rifling it. Allen has not been his usual self the past two weeks. He is making inaccurate throws that last year he was hitting. It isn't time to hit the panic button yet, and I agree the pass protection is contributing to the regression in his mechanics. If he gets out of his funk we could be unstoppable.

     

    The interception was a throw he shouldn't have tried. That slant was double covered and you have to have a better post-snap read than that.

  5. On the Miami side, I definitely thought that Brissett handled the Buffalo pass rush way better than Tua did, but they really just didn't solve what Buffalo was doing on defense at all.

     

    Buffalo's offense picked up in the 2nd half, mostly on the back of the running game. Scoring 3 touchdowns on 4 possessions in the is the efficiency you want, even if it doesn't always look pretty. With 33 passes and 30 runs, I appreciate the attempt at having a more balanced approach, especially when the rushing attack works to the tune it did today.

     

    But the pass protection is an issue here and clearly affects the overall efficiency. The film review is going to show a few things:

     

    The Bills trying to use the crossing routes against the heavy man defense that worked for them last season and the protection not holding up. Allen's passes also seemed too floaty and he was throwing off his back foot some. When the protection held up, it looked like last year. When it didn't, it looked more like 2019.

     

    Defensively, it looks like a top unit so far but everything with only a 2 game sample size is a taken with a very big pile of salt.

    • Like (+1) 3
    • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...