-
Posts
1,850 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Starr Almighty
-
-
3 minutes ago, bills6969 said:
Trade him to Cowboys for Lamb
1st season as a fan huh
-
3
-
-
1 hour ago, BuffaloBillyG said:
It's been over 30 years. Pretty sure it's time to move on.
🥱🥱🥱
-
3 minutes ago, eball said:
I guess we'll find out all we need to know about the malcontent Stef Diggs, amirite?
He's fine. I have no doubt he will be there.
-
2
-
-
For all saying NJG am I the only one that remembers the Superbowl? I hate that franchise. Also going to one of their games is awful. The fans sit on their hands all game and get mad if you stand up on 3rd down.
-
1
-
-
19 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:
If it was funny, I'd agree with you.
It's not a joke it's a fact.
36 minutes ago, ddaryl said:
I said it the way I meant it..... East Rutherford is the ARM PIT of NYC... When you go there you can look across and you can see the NYC skyline, but East Rutherford is pretty much a ***** hole
I still love it every single time I hear someone say it, I have no issues with it, its not old for me, and I can't wait to hear it again , and again
Agreed but as a NYer I don't want East Rutherford associated with NY
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said:
It's easier than that. They are NY teams because they were founded in and spent a combined total of 75 years in the city. Then, seeking a new stadium to play in, they both ended up in the Jersey swamps 5 miles west at the Meadowlands because it was cheap to build there. The boundary between the city and Jersey is by far the most blurred sate line in the country.
If the Giants hadn't moved to NJ 47 years ago (and the Jets 39 years ago), then yeah, bringing this up in 2023 might still be funny or a real burn to those 2 teams and their fans. They really don't get how this makes fun of them at this point. If you live in the city, you already knew that.
I live in the city and most people will argue that they play in NY because it's closer than Buffalo. When I ask if the Dodgers and SF Giants are still NY teams the discussion ends. NYers get very angry when you tell them their teams play in NJ. My main argument use to be when coming from the city I would drive by the Nets arena before I got to Giants stadium. How is that arena in NJ and then when I pass it deeper into NJ it became NY again. Does it really matter not at all. But it bothers their fans so I like it 🤣
4 minutes ago, ddaryl said:East Rutherford is the arm pit of NJ
Orchard Park is a pleasant suburb of Buffalo
I still love the diss.... Bills are the only pro football team that plays its home games in NYS, it will never get old !Fixed it for you
-
32 minutes ago, Nextmanup said:
I never understood the whole "Jets and Giants don't play in NY" thing.
OK, so what?
So the Bills are the only team actually headquartered in NYS.
Who gives F?
When you say "we" are you speaking for all 9 million people in the 5 boroughs?
Or are you speaking for yourself?
When I say we I'm speaking for everyone I've met, but that was cute. I hope you are from here otherwise move along cause you don't know what you are talking about. NJ is viewed as the little brother not as part of NYC by New Yorkers.
1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said:That's hardly important.
Anyway....They aren't NJ's teams, they are NY's.
Then you don't consider the Jets and Giants as NJ teams either.
I didn't day NJ is part of NY. It's a suburb of the city.
The reason I do is a bit different than others. Living in NY and knowing that driving over the GW bridge means I'm going into NJ is my reasoning.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said:
NJ is a suburb of NYC. It exists because of this. This is only a thing for upstaters to discuss.
It's not a point worth making...over and over
What if I told you I am in NYC since birth. We don't like Jersey and we don't consider it part of us.
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:
Bills don’t play in Buffalo
But they play in NY
-
1
-
-
12 hours ago, BillsFanForever19 said:
Yes, it's more likely than not Hopkins would have better stats. It's not a guarantee though. No one knows how either would work with Josh.
But that doesn't change the fact that he already signed Harty to a contract worth 5 this season that would cost more to cut him than keep him. He also spent a 1st and a 4th on a Big Slot WR. He's not looking at those guys and thinking "unproven, better go get Hopkins" like you and others are. He went out and got them because he has a role for them here.
Beane isn't going to pay big money for Hopkins. There's a reason he's visiting Tennessee and New England and he hasn't signed with us already. Beane has a price he's willing to pay (if he's made an offer at all) and he's not sweating whether or not Hopkins comes around to it or not. Because he's a luxury at this point.
This is a joke right? Last year Hopkins missed 8 games. And he was 81 yards short of Harry's career yardage in a single season where he only played half the games.
Harty Career 798 yards
Hopkins 2022 season 717 yards
Please stop.
Can't guarantee he says 😂😂😂😂
-
2
-
-
If the Bills sign DHop this guy will change his prediction to 14-3
-
1 minute ago, BillsFanForever19 said:
In targets? No, probably not. But if he proves to be a consistent speed deep threat for Josh, it's not completely insane to think he'd surpass Davis in yardage. And if that role comes to fruition in conjunction with Knox and Kincaid and Diggs as WR1 - Davis could become more of an afterthought anyways. Harty may or may not be a guy to step over Davis if he begins to faulter. But the way he's a complete and total nothing and an afterthought to you and other posters isn't fair. He's a player that Beane targeted in the 1st Wave of Free Agency and one of the few players he actually paid some money for outside of the minimum. He didn't do that to be completely buried on the Depth Chart and with fears of what he brings to the table.
Between him and Dalton and then Trent and Shorter on the bottom of the depth chart with what we already have, he's done a lot and built his pass catching core the way he liked. That's why we're not going balls to the wall for Hopkins. He isn't the need here that he is on most other teams.
That's fine that's what you want. But, again, the fact is that Beane targeted him very early in Free Agency is one of the select few he actually paid some money for. He didn't do that thinking "not a known commodity".
It means that Beane thinks he is a player worth acquiring and paying that for. Whether or not you think he was worth it or is a good player is a mute point.
You didn't answer who would have better stats on the Bills Harty or Dhop. I'm pretty sure that was done on purpose.
-
1 hour ago, BillsFanForever19 said:
He is the most realistic chance. But Harty's contract raised a lot of fans eyebrows. And looking into him and the contract he was given, it's pretty clear that us and other teams looked at his 2021 campaign and saw a player that in his first and only opportunity to get any sort of reps as a WR instead of just a KR - proved to be a fairly consistent deep threat on an average offense with an average QB.
Is it likely that Harty will become a Superstar? I wouldn't say for sure he will. But with Josh Allen throwing him the ball instead of Jameis Winston on an offense with the other playmakers we have? I don't think you can say there is no chance. And I think fans that are completely writing him off as a nothing signing are misinformed or wanting to discount him because they'd rather have a shinier toy.
If both Harty and Hopkins were on the Bills this upcoming season. Who would have better stats?
I know for a fact 1 guy will perform. The other is an unknown. I don't want shiny. I want a known commodity.
-
On 6/7/2023 at 8:34 AM, Xwnyer said:
maybe they want reliable backups?
This is definitely the reason because CBs go down all the time
-
Mine hasn't worked for weeks 🤷🏻♂️
-
1
-
2
-
-
4 minutes ago, HappyDays said:
Get this cold water out of here. I don't care about facts. 😂😂
-
2
-
1
-
-
35 minutes ago, TBBills Fan said:
"dont let him leave the building!"
Doesn't he have to be in the building first? 🤔
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, SUNY_amherst said:
I dont see an upgraded roster. The swap from Singletary to the plodding NE back is a downgrade. The defensive leader going to Chicago and replacing him with a rookie or expanding the role of AJ Klein is a big downgrade.
oh they got a new TE2? Usually takes those guys a year or two to develop
You said this same nonsense yesterday and I posted stats to prove this to be incorrect. Yet here we are with you repeating it
-
2
-
1
-
2
-
-
3 hours ago, Shaw66 said:
I've gotten beyond optimism and pessimism. Winning a Super Bowl is difficult. The Bills have enough on offense and defense to do it. They either will do it, and people's optimism will be justified, or they won't, and people's pessimism will be justified.
I watched the Celtics lose last night, and kept thinking that they are a team that just doesn't have the toughness, including the winner's attitude, to win the championship. As I watched, I worried that that could describe the Bills, too. It would break McDermott's heart to admit that his team isn't tough enough to win, and it's up to him to prove that they are.
Tatum got hurt on the 1st play and was invisible for the rest of the game. I don't know how hurt he was but he didn't attempt to play threw it and packed it in... That essentially ended the game
-
38 minutes ago, SUNY_amherst said:
No way. Murray is washed up, a depth piece, he may not make the 53 man roster
Harris is a plodding back, very different than Singletary and not nearly as good
Wow this is bad
177 819 4.6 5 vs.160 703 4.4 5
Ploddings best vs Devin's best
202 929 4.6 15 vs. 188 870 4.6 7
-
1 hour ago, 78thealltimegreat said:
If KC gets him the seasons a wrap is the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard. DHOP is a damn good receiver but he’s also in his 30s and coming off an injury.
Yes
Do you mind sharing what injury he's coming off of? And when exactly did he get injured. I'd like to let him know he's hurt cause I'm sure he's also not aware of this injury, with the rest of us
-
17 minutes ago, Solomon Grundy said:
Terry Glenn was NEVER that guy. Parcells thought a lot about Keyshawn Johnson!! Took him everywhere he went (Jets, Cowboys).
Keyshawn was never great. He believed he was in his mind but he wasn't. When the Bills played the Jets I never thought about him
-
3
-
-
I have a question for those that don't want him. Why does it matter if he goes to KC? He must not be good for you don't want him on your team.
-
18 minutes ago, Shaw66 said:
That's excellent. I didn't need the list of drops, because the fundamental point is obvious. The Bills don't have a lot of guys to catch a Hail Murray. Diggs maybe. Davis occasionally. DHop is definitely one of those guys.
So, that makes the question a little bit different. I agree, I guess, that adding him would be about adding a playmaker just so that you have him when you need him to make a play, at the end of the season and in the playoffs. It's similar to, but not exactly the same as, signing Miller last year. Regular season production is nice, but the Bills were clear that they brought him to make crucial fourth quarter plays, particularly in January. He's nice to have on the field at other times, and he contributes, but that's not what he's here for.
Miller's different because everything indicated that he had more miles left, that he could be that guy for three years or more. So, he filled both a longer-term need and a win-now need. Clearly, I don't know, but Hopkins feels more like a one-and-done guy, which is not McBeane's style. If he projects as a three-year contributor, and if the chemistry works, then he would be a more important acquisition.
He stops the double teaming of our best player. That alone is huge.
-
3
-
Hopkins released by Arizona (7/16: signed by Titans)
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
Please tell me what injury he had last season.