Jump to content

mjd1001

Community Member
  • Posts

    774
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mjd1001

  1. 2 minutes ago, D. L. Hot-Flamethrower said:

    Josh Allen was not the problem tonight. LOL at this take.

    I'm not saying he was the problem, I'm saying there were a handful of plays where he could have made a better decision that may have been enough to win the game for the Bills.  Everything isn't black and white...except I guess on this forum.

    • Vomit 1
  2. Just now, Rew said:

    Did you watch the same Allen as the rest of us?  He took safe/check downs most of the game.  Distributed the ball to most of the offense and was under duress most of the 1st half.  He had like 2 bad throws outside of the 2nd last drive with 17 to go.  The 2nd down play on that drive was the right decision but under thrown, other 2 were looking for too much.  Overall, Allen had a great game of "playing within the system" and "taking what they give you".

     

    Agreed on line play.  Hopefully this is a case of "they gel with time together".

    Yes I did, and as I have posted MANY times on here, on many of the 3rd down conversions that failed where he scrambled or threw deep there were guys open, and I mean wide open, that would have gotten the first down.  The question should be what game where YOU watching?

    • Disagree 1
  3. 1 minute ago, Generic_Bills_Fan said:

    These takes on Allen are genuinely confusing me...he had one play where he thought Davis was gonna open up deep and the weak side safety came over to help and he took a sack...that was it. That throw to sanders who beat double coverage was a good decision he just missed him it happens 

    I'm not sure what is confusing.  There were plenty of his incompletions or scrambles where they didn't get the first down...and there were guys wide open underneath or even just past the sticks.  Check out a replay of the game or the All-22 and you will see it.

    • Disagree 3
  4. 1 minute ago, BillsEnthusiast said:

    Just frustrated to get pushed around by these physical teams. Line play was atrocious again.

    The line play (offensive) is ALWAYS atrocious against any D-line that is just above average or better.  This O-line has been a weakness of this team, is currently a weakness and will continue to be a weakness.  They can perform good enough against bad teams, but they are exposed time and time and time again against  any D-line that is simply better than average.

    • Like (+1) 2
  5. Allen was overconfident again, often taking chances when better/safer options where there.  Offensive line was, is, and will continue to be a weakness.  The O-line looks good against bad D-units, but will almost always struggle against above average D-units, just like last year.  

    The Defense was never 'great'. They are 'good' but their results are more a function of who they played.

     

    On the call at the end, you go for it there. If that game goes to overtime, it's basically a 50-50 chance of you winning/losing.  You basically have a chance to come close to winning it right there on the 4th down.  I think getting the first and then getting a TD there was better than 50-50....they just didn't do it.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Vomit 2
    • Eyeroll 2
    • Disagree 1
    • Agree 1
  6. On 10/11/2021 at 12:41 AM, BillsShredder83 said:

    Al was worse to me. Old grumpy man up past his bed time. He's always come across like he's got a grudge against us, and im glad. Rubbed his nose in 💩

    I agree. I don't have a problem with Collinsworth.  Is he great?  No, but I don't see all the outrage. 

    Al on the other hand, I don't get the love for.  He was 'good' in his prime, nothing special to me but good/very good, but as you said he comes across as a guy getting really old and grumpy and just going to do and say what he wants.

  7. 2 hours ago, boater said:

    Too bad Buffalo is an economic wasteland and there's about 4 of these people with higher incomes of which you speak.

     

    My roofer can't afford downtown, but he can afford OP.

    As for your roofer, that is exactly my point. The new stadium will not be for people like him...it is for the professionals making well into the 6 figures.

     

    You haven't spent much time in Amherst, or looking at who is buying the hundreds of new houses put in in Lancaster lately?  Sure, were are not loaded with people whos net worth is over $100 million dollars....but in terms of people making 6 figures....I think there are more than you believe there are in the metro Buffalo and Rochester area.

    • Agree 1
  8. 10 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

    No but like I said it's not going to do much for the bar economy either because we're smart drinkers 

     

    It's a select crowd in Buffalo that party downtown... Buffalonians will absolutely get drunk at home and go to the game rather than bar hop downtown before the game 

     

     

    The thing is I think you are looking at the CURRENT crowd that attends Bills games. You know what you get with a new stadium, no matter where it is built?  More expensive tickets, sometimes MUCH more expensive tickets that price out some people and those people are replaced in the stands with people with more money.  You also get the 'something new' thing to do that gives further incentive for the same thing.  Here's an example...

     

    -I had season tickets in my 20's for about a decade. I gave them up a while ago and don't go to games anymore. A New stadium..especially one in Downtown? I'm likely...if not to get season tickets...to at least want to go to a few games and I'll pay top dollar for them.  I have a very close relative who makes well into the 6 figures who also gave up season tickets, but he said with a new stadium, PREFERABLY downtown, he's likely back in for the 'novelty' of it and he'll pay triple or more to do so compared to what he paid in the past. 

     

    And its not just Buffalo, look at when new stadiums were opened in the past (I was living in Boston when the pats stadium opened about 20 years ago).  Not all of them, but a good number of the younger tailgate-and-drink crowd gets replaced. They get replaced with high income earners, mostly in their 40s and 50s and 60s....many that don't tailgate, and they want to go to that bar or restaurant to eat before or after the game.

     

    I think if a stadium was built downown, and ticket prices go up considerably, you will see a full stadium at the games.  Just that a large number of the current 'tailgate' crowd will be replaced by older people with higher incomes that aren't tailgaters, but go to the game for more of an 'upscale' experience. Smart/cheap drinkers are replaced by ones that are willing to spend more money.

    • Agree 3
  9. On 9/29/2021 at 12:19 PM, DCbillsfan said:

    "BB 62 - 74".  Is that Belicheats record without Marcia?

    Look at it another way.

     

    Without Brady as his starting QB, he is now in his 9th season (with no Brady)

    In those 9 seasons:

    -2 winning records, 7 losing records (including this year so far, 6 full season losing records)

    -1 playoff appearance

    -Overall Losing record

    -Negative point differential in the teams he coached for every season without Brady except for just 1.

     

    Those are the type of results that get you fired from multiple jobs, not results that have you considered one of the coaching greats of all time.

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Thank you (+1) 2
  10. I have been looking in on some other games while watching the Bills.  

    2 observations...Big Ben is really done, isn't he? I've seen a couple of his passes today and they barely had a spiral on it. He is getting about 5 yards per COMPLETION right now also.

    And Mac Jones. Hes not playing BAD, but I don't know yet why the New England Media thinks he is their savior. He just doesn't throw the ball more than 10 yards in the air.  MAYBE he is really good, but there is no way of knowing it from what anyone has seen so far.

  11. 1 minute ago, ColoradoBills said:

     

    Seriously asking a question.  How can a fan of the Buffalo Bills not take at least a couple of hours to enjoy a 35-0 shutout win?

    We can enjoy the game AND think about the future at the same time. Its called mental multi-tasking.  It can be a fun exercise.

    1 minute ago, daz28 said:

    Settle down Francis.  We're all good fans, and were all always happy after a win.  Enjoy it

    As I said in my previous post, you are the one that needs the 'settle down francis'.  How about letting people enjoy the game and the win the way they want to.  The simple fact that the post I was replying to was a person who was complaining about HOW other fans were enjoying the win proves that.  Take your own advice, you are the one that needs to settle down and not worry about how others view the game and enjoy the win.

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Dislike 1
  12.  

    5 minutes ago, RunTheBall said:

    My god there are so many people who can’t enjoy a W. When did Bills fans get so soft? A W is a W and this was a beat down. If our defense continues it’s current level of play we won’t NEED to put up 35 points a game. Would I like Josh and the O to look more in sync? Sure. Am I worried? Not a bit. We have one of the best coaching staffs in the league (as much as I curse them) and they will figure it out. Anyone who can’t enjoy a 35-0 BEAT DOWN of Miami because you are looking 5 games ahead to the Chiefs needs to get some perspective. It’s a week to week league, any given Sunday. Bills fans of all people should know how to enjoy the W’s when they come because we’ve had so many years of L’s. 

    Ok, just because we don't enjoy the game that way YOU do doesn't mean we can't enjoy a win.  You know who is soft? The Bills fan just looks at the scoreboard against a mediocre Miami team and sees 35-0 and things everything is well. THOSE are the fans who are soft.   Part of being a fan for many of us is that we want to look forward to games against better teams than we beat already.  We WANT to think of ways the team can be better than it is.  Just because we don't fall in line behind the way YOU want us all to be fans doesn't make any of us soft.  It just means we are different. If anything, maybe BETTER fans because we can enjoy a win but want the team to keep getting better and better.

     

    The biggest bunch of babies on this forum are those that complain about other fans of the team and how we choose to be fans. "you aren't enjoying the game the way I do...WHAA WHAA!"  "You are saying bad and mean things about the team I love! Whaa! Whaa!"  Accept that people can be fans differently than you are and get over it. 

     

    Take your own advice and stop being miserable. ENJOY the win without getting pissed at other people who watch and enjoy the game in a different way.

     

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1
    • Haha (+1) 1
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
    • Dislike 1
  13. 17 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said:

    Can we step back from the ledge yet?

    I'm not, nor was I ever 'on the ledge', but I still have concerns and think this team needs a pretty good amount of work if they want to compete with/beat the Bucs, Chiefs, maybe even the Pats/Dallas.

     

    Not everyone who wasn't 100% overjoyed that they beat up on a mediocre Dolphins team is 'on the ledge'. And that also doesn't mean we can't enjoy a win. But many of us like to look forward just as much as we do look back.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Vomit 1
    • Sad 1
    • Agree 1
    • Haha (+1) 1
  14. 3 minutes ago, 78thealltimegreat said:

    They where ranked 6th in league and the Pats only scored only 16 points last week haters gonna hate 

    Haters going to hate? that must be something you just say when you are wrong and have nothing else to say. Guess what it doesn't mean anyone is a 'hater' just because you say it.  And they are ranked 6th in what way? Points?  Yards? Dvoa? there are a lot of ways to rank a D-unit.

    You don't allow as many points as they do in big games and so many yards to a rookie with being a top d-unit. You just don't. Get out of here with the 'haters going to hate' bull.

  15. Just now, ROCBillsBeliever said:

    How did Zim get a penalty on that? He literally pulled his hands back, and didn't land on Brissett...

    NFL officiating is getting pretty much like NHL officiating.  The officials have some strange formula in their head to determine if it was a penalty...a bit of what the actual rule is, a bit of what it 'looked like', a bit of if someone got hurt or not (even if it was a clean play) and a bit of pure randomness.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Angry 1
    • Agree 1
  16. Just now, Niagara Dude said:

    Hard to say the Bills have work to do on offence after scoring 35 points

    Not if you have actually watched the game.  OL had breakdowns (that can be corrected), a few mis-communications on routes with Allen, and some misfires by Allen.  

    They made the most of some of their opportunities, but there certainly is work to be done to be better against a good team.

    • Like (+1) 1
  17. 3 minutes ago, 78thealltimegreat said:

    The Dolphins are one the best defenses in football 

    No, they are not.

    The Pats led by a rookie QB put up almost 400 yards on them last week.

    Last year they allowed over 30 points 5 times.   The Bills (mostly backups) put up over 50 on them in a game that was important to Miami. 

    Those things just don't happen to a Defense that is one of the best in the NFL.

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...