Franco_92
-
Posts
2,320 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Franco_92
-
-
16 minutes ago, DCOrange said:
The thing is that you can apply any of these statements to any of the QBs you want and pretend that they're describing your guy. All of the QBs in this draft are capable of dropping back and throwing; and saying that the ability to do so is important is something that literally every coach, scout, and fan would agree with.
Not really, some have done it their whole college career, and some literally never did it more than a couple times, and it showed with their combine footwork. If he's telling the truth then you could definitely eliminate some names from contention.
this is not an argument that the QBs who haven't can't be good, btw.
-
McCarron warming the seat for rookie to step in at some point in October/November.
I'll take the potential extra losses this setup might give us for 2018, as long as that QB is there.
Do it right. -
-
I have a friend with Schizophrenia and his breakdown was eerily similar to this. I hope Zay is okay and is getting proper help.
-
4 minutes ago, #34fan said:
Passing on two first-rounders could get you exactly this... -In '18, this team is a GREAT position draftwise... I honestly don't see tons of difference between the
2nd tier QB's and the 1sts in this draft... KEEP THE DAMN PICKS...-Fill needs with young talent, instead of waiting for free agency every year.
You might not see the difference but it's there. Allen, Jackson, Rudolph etc are trash and we have as good a chance as any other year of getting a franchise qb up top. Continuing to do what you say will go a long way towards guaranteeing mediocrity until we suck so bad we dont have to trade up, which didn't happen ONCE during our !@#$ing century long playoff drought.
!@#$ that plan. !@#$ that thinking. Get your franchise qb.-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, #34fan said:
2018 1st Rd (#12 overall)
2018 1st Rd (#22 overall)
2018 2nd Rd (#53 overall)
2018 3rd Rd (#65)
2019 2nd RdIt absolutely can! -Forget about the fact that you have no idea what kind of talent you're giving up this draft, (and next)
You may move up to draft something worse than a bad QB... -A mediocre QB... The kind of QB that can't get it done, but shows just enough year after year to
keep bringing him back. Before you know it, three years are down the drain... The regime that made that mistake is now gone, now another half-assed regime
is desperate again, so they make another dumb trade for what they believe might be "The Guy", and the process starts all over again... Mortgaging the future
isn't a remedy... I don't think it's a bad idea to bite the bullet so your team can make real strides.
giving up all of that stuff still lets us make a 1st, 2nd, 3rd,4th,5th, 6th round pick this year, plus everything but a second next year. How often can we realistically take a qb high and still be able to say that?
It's time. -
for a thread-starting nazi, 26 sure starts a lot of pointless threads.
-
9 minutes ago, #34fan said:
ALL THAT???? -For kid who may not even be able to play???
This, people, is exactly why you tank... -It only hurts ONCE... -This trade could debilitate a team for the better part of a decade.
We would literally still have a full draft.
But "wait til next year"..."the time isn't right"...and ten years of 7-9 to 9-7 go by with every team in that stretch having at least one franchise qb while we sit on our thumbs spinning in circles making sure we have our Matt Milanos and Karlos Williams's. -
6 minutes ago, Domdab99 said:
More and more I’m wanting them to stay at 12 and take Jackson. There’s no reason he can’t be as good of a WB as any of the other QBs in this draft.
Sure there is, and that reason is his accuracy when facing real defenses on a football field in pads.
We always talk about completion percentage, but completion percentage can be fixed or reflect positively/negatively on system and teammates. Watching a qb throw inaccurately, however, cannot be fixed as easily. And when I SEE a qb as inaccurate as Allen or Jackson, no amount of citing historical COMPLETION PERCENTAGES will change the way I feel. Only improved mechanics and accuracy can, and that literally never happens.
-
I'd add more.
Time to stop !@#$ing around, Buffalo Bills. Get your quarterback and build your team.I guarantee we won't be pissing and moaning 3 years from now about extra seconds/thirds when we're heading into a home AFC championship game.
Even if it doesn't work, we still have a much greater chance of that in the near future if we make a move NOW for a qb like Rosen than if we wait another indeterminate amount of time, perpetually in a state of "that's too much" or "this qb class is weak, maybe next year".
!@#$ing do it.
-
2
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, McBean said:
Josh Allen freakin sucks.
Watch the tape. The guy couldn’t do it against softies in a terrible conference. When he played somebody that was worth something he folded. Terrible accuracy and despite what people think you CANNOT fix accuracy.
Picking him in the first round would be awful and set this team back years.
Again, McBeane isn’t that stupid.
Seriously, what the hell are some of these posters smoking?
-
1
-
-
18 minutes ago, slaphappy said:
Where did the inaccurate label come from? That would be the only turn off for me. Does he have accuracy issues or no?
It comes from watching his alarmingly bad decision making and throws when he was in the unique and unimportant situation of...wearing pads against a (always weak, in that conference) defense in real actual football games.
-
idgaf about anthems
but i do gaf about being a good qb
and he is not a good qb
-
2
-
-
58 minutes ago, Putin said:
I'm hoping we stay away from both of them , I'll take the Oklahoma kid
As someone who currently lives in Norman, if he can put up those numbers in the !@#$ing midwest winds that I have to bike through every !@#$ing day, then he can handle the weather in Buffalo
-
Rosen
Mayfield
Darnold
------------------------------------------------ The don't-draft-these-guys-in-rounds-1-3 line---------------------------------------
Jackson
Allen
The rest
-
It had better be Rosen with Mayfield as a backup plan
-
3
-
1
-
-
The accuracy "issue" is not debunked by playing with numbers, even if the "completion percentage issue" is. Watching him shows that his placement and accuracy in general are subpar, and there is no historical context which should make anyone confident that he becomes good at that stuff, or that he can be a good NFL QB without it.
-
It's easy to disect on tape that his football IQ is literal garbage if you're watching the right tape. Ie, tape of him playing football, not chucking in shorts or palming basketballs
-
If either Jackson or Allen do well, I will eat crow. If Rosen and Mayfield aren't top ~8 QBs for a long time, I'll also eat crow. That is the only position I care about enough to really have opinions about these guys, other than to really root for Barkley and Griffin.
-
1 hour ago, BuffaloBillsGospel said:
Show me these videos where a WR is full on halting to catch Jackson's pass, I have watched him 2 seasons straight all of his games, show me this video.
Call me crazy, I know, but I don't have footage available of the ~5th best QB prospects hundreds of attempts this past year?
It's hard enough to get anything beyond highlight videos, much less an exact !@#$ing throw from the exact game.
-
6 minutes ago, JimKellyTryouts said:
Wow, I didn't know he was victim to 38 drops. I'll admit I don't follow college players much, but are the accuracy concerns he get nothing but hot takes from box score experts, or...?
I've watched him a few times and his touch/placement is not there. Even in the highlight clips his open-by-an-acre receivers are adjusting and slowing and veering to get under his throws. I've seen them downright halt in their routes before. It's bad and since accuracy can't be taught, I stay far away from Lamar (and Allen).
-
1
-
1
-
-
35 minutes ago, joesixpack said:
Hey while you’re at it how about mocking Muslim belief too? No?
Pretty sure that muslims also believe in the same young earth creation story, if they are "literalists", because the christian texts are also holy texts in islam, so in a way he was also mocking muslims who take that story literally too.
-
17 minutes ago, DC Tom said:
It's physics. Aggregation of material under gravity results in a spherical shape above a certain certain size. A flat earth requires a completely new and locally wildly different theory of gravity.
You should hear what these people, and closely related electric universe "theorists", think about physics and gravity in particular. They don't care what physics says.
-
Yeah, if you could give a more thorough writeup of this I'd like to read it, but I don't have time rn to go listen myself.
If we draft Mayfield or Jackson...im done
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Mayfield can "deliver the ball" with some of the best accuracy I've personally ever seen out of a qb prospect.
Allen, lmfao