erynthered

Has anyone ever seen a bigger apologist than that piece of sh--?? He might as well get on his knees and blow T.O. I thought Tom Jackson and Mike Ditka were going to slap him. Go yourself Micheal Irvin............ < rant over>

My four year old:

I've found plenty of evidence with which to support my position--various links, thought experiments, my Monte Carlo simulation, even the opinion of someone who does stats for a living (Wraith). The only evidence I've seen you show to support your position is your ability to throw insults at people. In looking for those extra links on regression toward the mean, I didn't see a single one which supported your view, or hinted at such support. Not one. I've never seen anyone support your view, outside of these forums.

But But but....“We must make equality for gays and lesbians a mainstream concern,” Mr. Romney wrote in a detailed plea for the support of the club, a gay Republican organization.

You can't blame any one person or administration for it. However, some of the dealings we had back then with Iraq and Iran and the Saudis certainly have fueled today's situation.

You're not even reading the same book as everyone else. You're still confusing variance with error.

OMG!!!

All along, I've been saying that people who get very high scores on I.Q. tests tend to do a little well upon being retested. If you look at the first four posts on page 16 of the Err thread, you'll see Bungee Jumper ridicule this view. 860026[/snapback] So NOW you're point is "regression toward the mean happens", and not "regression toward the mean happens because of measurement error, just like when you don't roll a 3.5 with a single die..." like it has been for the past month. Do you honestly think you can blather on for fifty or so pages, and then suddenly wake up one day and claim you were saying something else?

Thank God you're only an observer to this bloody mess. Wait? Did I say God?

I'm kidding! Its not like you don't encourage it, relax.

Have a great Christmas!!

Where's my Rope, might as well end it now. Its never been worse than it is now. !@#$ it, I'm done with life.

I didn't want to go down that road, it would have been to easy. Though there is this spot, you can go to. Not far off the main road. Its pretty curvy, lots of nooks and such to lap up......ehhheeemmm You can definitely get in trouble there. Beautiful Sunsets too.

Fong got it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sorry to read about it, though. Bummer.

Glad to hear you got the Fire Chief Job in Kentucky. BTW, look out for those cross dressers from Alabama.

Even God Loves idiots.

Most of the people in San Fransisco right now are saying " See, I told you God was a Pole smoking Fag!!" Nice work.

I am God. Feel better? BTW, I dont care about you.

When I read this thread, I couldn't help but think of the Movie Arther (sp). When Dudley Moore says to Liza Minelli, "One would have to meet someone of your stature at a bowling alley". Times change, I suppose. Sorry, had to say it. Good luck to all you right handers out there.

M U S T N O T S A Y A N Y T H I N G

OK, Isn't it dependent upon the game? Yes, you agree. That's why I said I'd like to see what happened before this clip. There are so many intangibles. This argument is really moot, without knowing what happened before this clip. But I don't think, just because they might only be on the ice for one shift, means, they'll only get into a fight. We could split hairs all night, if you like? My fridge is full. BTW, that is a classic clip, thanks. It brought back some painful memories.

I'd have to check with my dentist, on your first question. The style and rules of the game has changed over time, right? Face macks, blue & red lines, size of rinks, Goal size, overtime, shootouts, speed, size of the players...etc. Should I go on? My thought of what you said here: Is that, you cant assume. That's why I was asking for someone who may have seen the game. Also, assuming that just because they are on the ice at the same time, doesn't mean they're going to go at it, just because. Please understand, I know what you're saying. But I don't think its entirely correct. Nor am I possibly. But I doubt it.

It was funny.

I played for almost 30 years. I'm not sure I agree with you. I guess, if anything, someone who saw that game may enlighten us. And Joe, I'm not sure if I agree with you either. BTW, I understand all the consequences of the game, so please.

I'd like to know, what preceded that. Just to see why they danced. I also like the way they waited for the puck to drop.