Jump to content

TSOL

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,042
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by TSOL

  1. 1 hour ago, Andy1 said:

    An astonishing number of people or groups have wrecked their lives after drinking the Trump koolaide. Many associates sent to prison, many believing followers sent to prison, lost jobs, fractured relationships, many dead, a $787 million dollar judgement against Fox, etc…. There probably isn’t another person in America who has as much negative impact on their associates or followers.

     

     

    FAFO' er. 👆

  2. 18 minutes ago, BillStime said:


    I don’t follow Fani Willis but I just took a quick look at her FB and Twitter. 
     

    She hasn’t posted anything on FB in over a year and her Twitter doesn’t have much alarming either.

     

    Other than the fact that she exists and is going after your King - what’s the issue? 
     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    I was just curious I'm not surprised that she has gone radio silent being that she's prosecuting  the case of the millennium. And she's sure to be under scrutiny from the defense. 

     

    I think the defense is already looking at some of her past politicized social media interactions  

  3. Just now, Chris farley said:

    just pointing out it cultist behavior doesn't have to be one guy, can be a group as well.

     

    And how deep do you have to be in an illogical looptop to believe the world is in a worldwide epidemic and we need to isolate, shut everything down. but not worry about protesting.  you got to be deep in the propaganda for that one not to at least make you think twice. critical thinking skills are not a bad thing..

     

    Covid is real, science proves that. 

     

    The social and government response to it, is what was not following science or facts. 

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    They are the FAFO'ers 

     

    Idk if it's a cult or what but it's definitely a large contingent of followers 

    • Like (+1) 1
  4. 36 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

    Any decent lawyer would be submitting that as evidence in said trial. and then would be using it for appeals after..

     

     

     

     

    The state always seems to manage to fûck stuff like this up, don't they? Private lawyers seem to get much better results in big complicated high profile cases like these. 

     

    I hope the libs are ok when all this is said and done 

    • Like (+1) 1
  5. 12 hours ago, BillStime said:


    Oh, that’s why? LOL

     

    Then why is this MAGA nutter so upset?

     

     

     

     

     

    They really have a muzzle on Fani Willis right now, don't they. How does her Twitter look right now? How bout her Facebook. I know you keep an eye on these things.

     

    Has she posted about any political rallies or fundraisers lately? 

    • Agree 1
  6. 33 minutes ago, Irv said:

    Sometimes I wonder why I waste my time on PPP.  I feel like I have never changed the mind of the Tibs, Billsy, Frank, Hawk/Fergy, Kemp delusionists no matter what I post.  Do you ever get the same feeling?  Why am I here?  Entertainment value?  

     

     

    You aren't going to change anyone's mind on here, but maybe you can make people with opposing views think twice. Make sure people aren't spreading false information. 

     

    it's fun to argue, call each other out, mock each other, mock politicians. But yes, we are wasting our time 

     

    Good times man 

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1
  7. 4 minutes ago, BillStime said:


    Why cherry pick what’s in the constitution?

     

    The 14th Amendment is in there for a reason.

     

     

     

     

    Yeah I was looking at that when I was arguing with one of you booger eaters last week or so. 

     

    I found it inconclusive 

     

     

    You guys are the ones who want to be ble to cancel your political rivals and amendments to the Constitution. 

    • Like (+1) 2
  8. 34 minutes ago, Kemp said:

     

    Taking the word of Putin over your own advisors is not being a hardass.

    If a Dem had done that, what would have been the reaction of Republicans?

    If a Dem had done things like praise attackers of the Capitol, or create fake electors in the hopes of reversing election results, or threaten a government official with retaliation if they didn't find votes to make him the winner etc,. what would your reaction be?

     

     

    I would vilify the crap.outya them... Lol 

  9. 7 minutes ago, Kemp said:

     

    It's not the meeting part that bothers some of us.

    It's his constant praise of dictators and his constant derision of non-dictaors.

    The worst part was his taking the word of Putin over his own advisors.

    Can't you admit that if a Democrat President did that, that Republicans woud want that guy tossed out of office?

     

     

    I get Trumps mentality, it's a "keep your friends close, your enemies closer" type of thing. 

     

    Democrats have different mentality in my view. Trump is clearly like an old fashioned hard-a$$ type. I get that, I can relate with that. 

     

    Democrats are more the smile and lie to you types. We can all agre, I think, that politicians are pretty sleazy, Trump just does it to your face where a Biden tries to be sneaky behind your back about it. 

     

    Again, me personally, I can better relate to the "right to your face" approach 

  10. 1 minute ago, Kemp said:

     

    I am honestly confused by the interpreter story.

     

    Was it reported wrongly at the time or did I get the story wrong?

     

     

    I'm honestly not trying to be sarcastic at all, I just think that it's really unheard of for an American president to meet with authoritarian leaders like Putin and Kim Jung whatever-his-name. I really don't think he secretly conspired with them to undermine America or democracy. I think he was trying to do something no other president was able to do in having some open lines of communication. 

     

    The interpretor was nearly subpoenaed to give the transcript of the conversation, but that was clearly politically motivated by the left who didn't trust/ didn't want to trust Trump. It was an attack to diminish his accomplishments in meeting with these leaders. 

     

    But the left backed off  the subpoena  probably because it didn't make political sense for them 

     

    I just don't see how Trump meeting with these leaders is some indictment of him being a dictator 

    • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...