Jump to content

Bookie Man

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,364
  • Joined

Everything posted by Bookie Man

  1. I mean just looking at what our roster is comprised of. Diggs - 5th Davis - 4th Shakir - 5th Sherfield - UDFA Harty - UDFA Could find a starter in any round.
  2. I was in Dublin a few days ago and I was at the Teeling Distillery. They have a room where you can sign your name on the wall. About 5000 names and things written. Saw a big BILLS MAFIA tag front and center.
  3. I think we’ll start seeing more and more WR/RB hybrid players. Cordarelle Patterson and Deebo Samuel type players.
  4. With the 50th pick in the 2023 NFL draft, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers select Matthew Bergeron, OT Syracuse. The Buccaneers have made a statement with their first two selections. They are fast tracking a dynamic rushing attack for the 2023 NFL season. In round 1, they add the exceptionally talented RB, Bijan Robinson. In round 2 they double down on the commitment to a running game and they go and get Bergeron. Bergeron is a dynamic and versatile LT who can take over for 2015 2nd round pick Donovan Smith. Smith was cut this offseason in a cap saving move, leaving a huge gap at LT. Bergeron meets need, value and philosophy. New OC Dave Canales is no stranger to reviving NFL QBs careers (Geno Smith). Look for Mayfield to have his best year as a pro with talent at WR and now RB. Bergeron joins an OL featuring 2023 Pro Bowler Tristan Wirfs and 2021 Pro Bowler C Ryan Jensen, round outing a formidable unit. Next on the clock is @RyanC883.
  5. With the 19th pick The Tampa Bay Buccaneers select Bijan Robinson. The Bucs look to revamp a rushing attack that ranked dead last in every major rushing statistical category. They snag the most talent running back in the draft.
  6. If it helps deter us from taking LB at 27 👍
  7. I'm neutral on this. Wonder if they won't be in nickel 92% of the time with McDermott running the D.
  8. Bucs, Bengals, Saints Thanks.
  9. Underwhelming. A very reactive player. Seems to get there a half step late. if LVE is his ceiling, hard pass at 27.
  10. Story of the draft is Nolan Smith sliding all the way to 36 😵. And also! 49ers Trade Aiyuk and pick #102 to Saints for Taysum Hill ☠️.
  11. I've been critical of Campbell as a prospect. But from what I've seen, zone coverage actually seems to be his strength. Didn't see much of him in man. But zone, he seemed very solid. Actually seemed like teams barely threw at him.
  12. Did he screw my wife? No man, cmon that's my neighbors job. But no seriously. I have nothing at all against the guy. I'm just stating my opinion after watching all of the video available to me. How much have you watched? I don't mean just highlight videos. I mean complete games and watch him every play. If you haven't you should. I'll bet your perspective changes. If you compare on film Campbell and Sanders, the difference is glaring. He has great intangibles, but bad instincts.
  13. Drew Sanders 12 GAMES 103 TT / 13.5 TFL / 9.5 SACKS / 3 FF Jack Campbell 13 GAMES 125 TT / 5.5 TFL / 1 SACK / 1 FF After watching as much game film of both of these 2 I can find, there's no way you could pick Campbell over Sanders. Sanders does not come without flaws, but he is a far better prospect than Campbell. DS has loads more potential than Campbell. This was his 1st season at MLB. He's far more versatile. He is an actual threat off the edge, racking up 9.5 sacks. For all of those who clamored for Edmunds to get plays at DE, Sanders actually has proven he can do it. As a blitzer, he fights through blocks, sometimes double teams and gets to the QB. Campbell blizting actually reminds me of Tremaine. He gets stood up by smaller RBs or easily picked up by an O lineman. Sanders is an explosive player, his play actually reminds of Milano. I heard all the buzz about Campbell and was excited to check out all of his footage. I have to say, I don't see it with this guy. Before I thought I wouldn't mind the pick if it was in the 2nd. But now I don't think I'd like that either. I wouldn't touch the guy. I'm not clamoring for Sanders or anything. But if LB is going to be the first pick, it would be a HUGE mistake to take Campbell over DS (or take him period). jmho.
  14. I get it. Great teammate and production. Tested well. But I really don't see the instincts with him. And he struggles to shed blocks. Not a game changer. The Posluszny comp is real. I could be ok with him middle/late round two. 27 would be a major reach.
  15. Campbell is not a 1st round talent imo.
  16. Edge is sneaky need. Who are we banking on? 34 year old Von coming off of ACL surgery? Rousseau to make a huge leap. AJE and Boogie are definition of JAG. This defense becomes extremely soft without a rush. No more Frazier, this is McDs defense this year. He is going to want to put his stamp on it. 1st pick is definitely defense imo. ILB is a more glaring need but edge is not far behind at all.
  17. Man idk. I see #40 all over the place. I saw him miss maybe 1 tackle, on a play that he diagnosed well (reverse) and ran across the field, still put a hit on the guy and it didn't go for big gain. He was killing it on special teams and was virtually in on about every play. Keuchly looks like a top 10 pick in that film imo.
  18. To me, Kuechly actually appears tenacious on this film.
  19. I really don't see it with this guy. Play recognition looks like it's lacking and can't shed a block. Cool LB name and good measurables. Not an impact player. I know he'll get drafted way earlier, but seems more like a 3rd round pick imho.
  20. Not sure would be an upgrade over what we have now.
×
×
  • Create New...