Kemp

Trump would have zero legal issues in regards to the docs if he had returned them when the government first requested them. You didn't hear about that part? The idiot brought it upon himself.

How many times did the government try and arrest Gotti? No doubt you would view that as a witch hunt, based on your stated logic. The difference is that Trump has been found guilty of a few crimes already.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66272655 Trump has always said that he never settles legal cases: https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS1047US1047&sxsrf=AB5stBg6D5NuSwjYiBPmWai7b-CB77OcHQ:1690040250719&q=trump+never+settles+legal+cases&tbm=vid&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi5-LLG0qKAAxX1M1kFHUeuCjwQ0pQJegQICxAB&biw=1536&bih=714&dpr=1.25

Maybe I undervalued Irv. Dead heat?

Who said Putin should be trusted over the American government? You always write lots of words but never about the topic. I'll ask another, fully realizing that you can't answer. If a Dem had bowed before Putin at a summit, what would Republicans have done? Would that be a disqualifier for you? You're making Farley look bright.

Apparently you don't know the difference between protesting and rioting, but if you support Trump, I can't really expect more from you. The sand called? Yikes. Another one who screams look over there instead of dealing with the topic. A new clown for the clown show.

Which Democrat said they take Putin's word over the U.S. government? Trump did that, right? Isn't that as good an example as one could find of one party saying don't trust your own government? What's the Biden comparable? If that's all he wanted, why did he wait hours to say a word about it? Why did he call them great people? Do you think the rioters are great people?

You're correct. Stir isn't the best way of putting it. Trump told his supporters hundreds of times that in reality he won and that his supporters votes were stolen. They believed him or at least wanted to and decided to help their guy out and storm the Capitol. So, it's inarguable that Trump was directly responsible for causing them to react in anger. He wanted them angry. Once it started, instead of trying to stop it, he watched TV of it all with great glee. When he was finally convinced to make a statement, he called the rioters great people. That's a lot more than stirring.

In which country are fake electors legal?

Well, my friend, you seem to be channeling opposite world. Could have sworn it was Trump who tried to destroy faith and confidence in our system when he believed Putin over our agencies. Maybe it was Hunter Biden impersonating Trump? Trump's stated and whole agenda is to destroy faith in American government. Hell, he even recently stated exactly that.

Anything can happen. I gave you a shot. You went Hillary, Hunter bla bla. I always say that cult members do exactly that when confronted. You lived up to expectations.

I will give you another shot. You say you didn't support 1/6. Why were the rioters there? Is there a possible explanation other than because Trump told them the election was stolen from them? Once that is established as truth, how could a sane person support him? Yes they are. The trials haven't started yet. You might still be able to say that for quite a while, but trials eventually end. Enjoy it all until even you understand it all.

Trump threatens America with more violence if he is found guilty. DOUG WAGNER: Is it something that concerns you of the people making sure that they don’t go out of their right mind if something like that happens, if that, for example, they do say — Jack Smith says, OK, I’m going to put Donald Trump in jail? DONALD TRUMP: I think it’s a very dangerous thing to even talk about, because we do have a tremendously passionate group of voters, much more passion than they had in 2020 and much more passion than they had in 2016. I think it would be very dangerous. That's the guy the cult members love. Remember when Republicans claimed to be for law and order?

When one party refuses to say that their guy is guilty, even after some of them yelled that he was guilty, and the court system can be delayed for years, things drag out. Whose fault is that? How do you explain the comments and behavior of the Republican Speaker of the House? Was he lying when he said Trump was responsible for 1/6 or when he later said Trump did nothing wrong? I would particularly like to hear your opinion on that. So, you're not voting for Trump. Why not?

Yeah, who can forget that it was too late to put Garland on the Supreme Court, but wasn't too late, even though it was much later, when it flipped. Cruz is busy now investigating Barbie. By the way, would you suck off a man who insulted your wife, like Cruz did?

I already answered. You can read it. Yes, all the folks defending Trump here won't be voting for him. Sure. In one breath you fume about the Democrats and treat Trump like he's an innocent. In another, you say none of you will vote for him. If he isn't guilty of anything and the Democrats are evil, why wouldn't you vote for him? This is an extreme logic failure, but I'm used to that.

Never an answer from you. Always what about......

I wrote something bigoted about religion? In the past, I may have said something against someone who falsely cloaked themselves in religion, for example Trump. Take the time he said “Nobody reads the Bible more than me.” Literally no one believes that if they have an IQ over 90. Now I'm your "friend" until you prove what a phony you are next time. Are you one of those self-proclaimed Evangelists who hasn't been in a church in many years?

In order for a cult to exist, there must be a leader who can't be contradicted. Obviously, Trump is that. Who is the equivalent on the other side? He can't answer that truthfully. It would cause a short circuit. He can only say what about....

So, you admit Trump is a con man. That's a point in your favor. What kind of piece of shiite do you have to be to steal from charities and be banned from participating in a charity?

In his life, a couple of things you'd be embarrassed about if it were you, unless you too are a sociopath, but I'm glad you raised that point because it's pure bullshiite. The proof of that is if he is found guilty of the serious charges he's facing, you won't accept the verdict and you'll remain with him. Tell me I'm wrong. All you do is project, much like your lord and savior. You're talking a lot, but you're not saying thing. *TH Has any Democrat who lost the Presidency ever failed to concede when it was ruled that they lost? Trump still hasn't and neither have some of the dolts here.

Lots of Twitter stuff there. Can you finally point to when the Democrats tried to illegally overthrow the election results? Has there ever been any politician other than Trump who tried to overthrow the government since the Civil War? The answer to both questions is a hard no. I suppose if one is in a cult they don't realize it, though. The Jim Jones folk probably didn't know they were in a cult either. Maybe I shouldn't be so hard on you guys.

If lying is a disqualifier for a politician, how could one ever cast a vote for the biggest liar in American political history? George Santos is trying to capture that title, but he still trails Trump by quite a wide margin.

You really don't know what a cult is? You believe Republicans are standing up for policies and beliefs rather than aligning behind one man? Remember when Republicans said they stood for small government and less spending, yet under Trump did the exact opposite. Do you remember what the official Republican platform was before the election? They didn't have one. Please explain how a party can have no platform, other than backing one man and then explain how that's not a cult.

You seem to not understand the difference between actors asking people to flip their votes and people attempting to overthrow a democracy. It's pretty simple stuff.