-
Posts
9,507 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by White Linen
-
-
According to S.I.
In front of all 32 NFL teams during Wisconsin's Pro Day, Cephus ran an official 4.56-second 40-yard dash.
- 1
-
22 minutes ago, mrags said:
All this back and forth and I can’t help but feel all warm and fuzzy that you are giving me so much attention. It’s almost like you and the OP are husband and wife.
Hint
There's something else you're not good at.
-
19 minutes ago, mrags said:
lol. Yeah but I know 3 yards is ALMOST 10 feet
Use your fingers.
That's what she said.
-
1 hour ago, mrags said:
Is that like 4.61 on almost as fast as 4.3 in the 40? If it’s only 8 feet then it’s more like 4.61 is almost as fast as 4.35. Or somewhere in there. I’m not a mathematician like the OP or you apparently.
but I do know that 10 feet is a significant distance in a race as short as 40 yards.
That's the first truth you've said in this thread. Math isn't your thing.
-
-
Just now, mrags said:
Hahahahahahaha. Your cute.
It's, you're cute.
I just had to.
- 1
-
4 minutes ago, mrags said:
You did see the part where I said “almost” right?
Oh, I didn't know we could do that. Coleman almost ran a 4.49 then.
-
Just now, mrags said:
You do know a yard is 3ft right?
So you think 3 x 3 = 10?
-
5 hours ago, mrags said:
Or see it with our own eyes
you said it yourself. 3 yards. And then said it didnt sound like it was that much. That’s almost 10 freaking feet. That’s 1.5 people you’re talking about. I’d say that’s a huge difference
You think 3 yards is almost 10 feet?
-
1 minute ago, GoBills808 said:
My point was not to connect them so much as to say I don't necessarily blame the folks who are
I get that, I just don't think that helped their cause is all.
-
1 minute ago, GoBills808 said:
I don't know what you mean
I was saying he was involved in scouting Benjamin and drafting Coleman
Pretty serious difference, don't you think? When you're trying to draw a line connecting Beane to Coleman and Benjamin.
- 1
-
38 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:
Yes that's why I said scouted
You also said drafted. How do you scout early?
-
37 minutes ago, SCBills said:
Potentially .. maybe seems that way because so many went early.
We got Gabe Davis in the 4th and Khalil Shakir in the 5th in deep WR classes as well. Are there those guys on Day 3 this year? Well see..
It got thin quick, IMO. When KC and Carolina picked, I was already questioning where this amazing depth was.
-
1 minute ago, SCBills said:
When you step back and think about it, it’s a bit headache inducing that in the deepest WR Draft in a long time, the team that was probably the most WR needy in the NFL took only one.
I kept getting the feeling this hyped up depth at WR was overblown.
-
I think Samuel is going to really pleasantly surprise some fans. I'd like to sign Tyler Boyd, who I believe can play outside. Then I'm satisfied with the WR situation.
-
Samuel is getting underestimated. I believe he's going to be an important piece that will become a fan favorite.
- 10
- 4
- 1
- 3
-
4 hours ago, GoBills808 said:
They're both big wideouts from the same school scouted/drafted early by Beane, relax
Incorrect, one was drafted by Gettleman.
-
1 hour ago, Kirby Jackson said:
No, I guess that I didn’t think that needed to be said. Draft evaluators use a top 500 or whatever to go through. That’s established through collective scouting.
And I didn't think I'd have to address a question like, do I think each team watches 16,000 players individually.
So we agree, professionals create the base for amateurs to pretend they are equal to them.
-
4 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:
Are you suggesting that NFL teams evaluate 16,000 players 😂??
Yes, as a collective and thats how the information gets to Kiper, Gunner, etc.
Are you suggesting that that Gunner is getting this information from his resources, without the baseline built by the pro's? 😯
-
7 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:
What do you mean by the foundations the professionals built for me? I know two NFL scouts I speak to occasionally but they don't build my board for me. I watch the tape and do my evaluations myself.
I read there's over 16,000 players eligible to be drafted. 256 will be selected.
Are you suggesting you build your board from scratch by watching hours of tape on 16,000 players? Not using any assistance from pre-rankings presenting, say, the top 300 that are truly prospects?
-
6 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:
Yea that isn't me. I'm sorry it isn't.
You're not using the foundation the professionals built for you?
7 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:One poster (currently) that I’m suggesting is doing the same level of research (minus the 1st hand information part). I’m not speaking from what I think but rather what I know. Is there a difference in information between an NfL team and amateur scouts? Of course. Is the gap as wide as people think? Nowhere near
Because the gap is even wider than people think.
-
47 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:
No I don't, I know exactly what I am. An amateur. That doesn't mean I can't ever have an opinion that is right over a professional.
The only reason you have an opinion is because the professionals put the information together for you. If you went at it alone, you'd know exactly what you are.
My wife doesn't watch football and would have every chance to win our fantasy league as anyone. The website gives the next best player available. If she didn't have that or couldn't buy a magazine, she would draft Knox 1st overall. That's you.
-
33 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:
Yep the 2018 Quarterback class was not my finest hour. For sure. But the "oh anyone who gets something right that GMs get wrong is just throwing ***** at the wall and getting some to stick" is a way of deflecting any criticism from the professionals who sometimes despite all their information make bad choices because a) they misevaluate; b) they convince themselves that what they want to be the case is the case when they have roster holes.
This post is so self aggrandising and shocking. You actually think you're more than a fan that likes putting time into the draft as a hobby.
-
2 hours ago, Big Turk said:
Well...there is no guarantee they are right either.
Plenty of round 4 WRs end up as really good players that would have been taken in the first round of there was a "do over" 4 years later.
I guess we would have to revisit it in 4 years to know, just like we would any pick really.
That wasn't the question.
Draft Analysis - We're All Debi from Depew
in The Stadium Wall
Posted · Edited by White Linen
I'll add that you also have to factor in the players that transferred through the portal, making the evaluation even more difficult and further disqualifying amateurs.