2003Contenders
-
Posts
2,690 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by 2003Contenders
-
-
Having worked for Wal-Mart back in my teens (about 20 years ago), I can tell you that they used to bend over backwards to prevent unions from ever forming. Thus, the company was very proactive about having good benefits, insisting that employees take their lunch breaks, allowing 15-minute breaks every 2 hours, etc.
I will have to say that it wasn't a bad place to work. Actually, it was just a year or so ago that I believe it was voted one of the 100 best comapnies to work for in the US.
The creation of a union would NOT help the workers there -- and would actually eventually lead to layoffs because the company would no longer be able to sell their merchandise at such low prices and still turn a profit.
I think the creation of the union in this case was more of an activist thing (aimed at creating bad pub for Wal-Mart and helping the mom and pop shops that ultimately get hammered whenever a new Wal-Mart comes to town), rather than really trying to make life better for the Wal-Mart employees.
At least that's how I see it...
-
This is a pretty good read...
Will Bledsoe Be Back in Buffalo in 2005?
The premise is basically what most of us seem to be calling for: that the Bills SHOULD bring Drew back -- but at a reduced salary and with open competition for the starting job.
-
d_wag,
The use of the tag at this particular point in time tells me that the Jets do not feel that they can work out a deal with Abraham and his agent prior to March 2. Since the team is in pretty good cap shape, they can afford to use the tag -- and the brandishing of the tag at this time may, in fact, be a message to Abraham and his agent that the Jets simply do not intend to let him walk for nothing.
-
I've heard Kelly say nothing of the sort -- and the last statement I heard from him (months ago) was that he thought J.P. was "going to be a good one."
-
It also serves as a stalling tactic. If they haven't reached a deal with Abraham by March 2, he comes unrestricted and can sign anywhere he wants. As of now, he can only negociate with the Jets -- unless some other team is willing to cough up the required compensation.
-
Hmmm. I'm not a Drew apologist -- but is he really any more washed up than Garcia or (especially) Johnson?
-
This guy is probably just a Cleveland fan with a website. He didn't even take the time to look up Drew's contract situation. Drew's base salary is just a little over $3 M this year -- not the $5 to $6M the guy cites. Even if the proposed trade were to occur before the March 2 roster bonus (which the Browns would then be liable to pay), he makes just a little over $4 M.
And where does this guy get the impression that Romeo prefers pocket passers. Is he on the record for having stated that?
-
King is a blow-hard idiot, who really should have no right to vote in things like the Pro Football HoF and League/Super Bowl MVP races. For example, he has played a MAJOR role in keeping Art Monk out of the Hall of Fame, yet he is a major supporter of Michael Irvin? Go figure.
-
Let's see... Bledsoe's cap hit for his signing bonus from last year alone is close to $2.2 M. The league minimum for a 10+ year veteran is $750K (only $450K counts against the cap). So, we are looking at a minimum cap hit of about $2.9M. This would have to be TD's starting point.
IF the team cuts Drew, then they eat the remainder of his signing bonus -- and we're looking at a $4.3M cap hit. So, if I'm Bledsoe, knowing that the team has to pay (against the cap) that much for me NOT being there, I wouldn'st settle for anything less for me TO BE THERE.
One thing to remember is that Drew is due a $1.05 M roster bonus on March 2. Since the issue of a paycut is coming up at all, if I were him, there is no way I'd wave this money and take ONLY a base salary, as that money isn't guaranteed. That is, from his perspective, why should he wave the roster bonus -- knowing that the Bills may just be waiting until after June 1 to cut him and spread his $4.3M cap hit over two years?
Thus, the best deal I can imagine the Bills making would be to allow Bledsoe to keep his roster bonus -- but to ask him to drop his base salary down to the league minimum. Such a move would change his cap number to: $2.2M + $1.05M + $450K = $3.7 M.
-
Note that the Colts article says:
"The Colts are expected to have approximately $20 million in salary cap space by the start of the league year (March 1). "
That implies that there are certain, expected moves that the team could make between now and then that would free up as much as $20 M under the cap.
-
How about Thurman misplacing his helmet in SB XXVI?
-
We're not talking about a $200 jersey here. We're talking $75K.
-
Considering that Jack (at least once) put a gun to Tony's head and played a role in his being arrested for treason, it is interesting that Tony was the "one person" Jack knew he could trust. Still, I love Tony and literally stood up and cheered when he came to Jack's rescue. Also, after Jack made that comment about the "one person", my wife and I started trying to guess who it may have been. Chase? Palmer? My guess is that it will turn out that Jack went to bat for Tony after he got arrested and helped him get off for "treason".
-
Our biggest problem is the schedule -- and the division in which we play. The bridge between the Bills and Pats is vast and wide. I think we are pretty much on pace with the Jets (depending on off-season moves). I also think that the Dolphins, while still likely to be odious next year, will be improved in 2005. Note that we didn't have a particularly easy time of it in either victory that we had over them last year.
Until we can win at least 4 games in our division, it is going to make it hard convincing me that we are Super Bowl bound.
-
My only fear is that if TD waits TOO long (i.e. right up until the draft) then the RB market may have saturated by then with a number of quality FAs -- and a reportedly deep RB class in this year's draft.
-
Good point, Nanker. People forget that what we did was spend a 2nd rounder (and a 5th I believe) to make THIS year's first round pick LAST year. With the sheer crap that this class (especially at QB) appears to be, major kudos to the Toms for pulling the trigger. I doubt that a QB of Loseman's quality would be there for the taking with the #20 pick. Time will tell (about both Loseman and the 2005 QBs).
Now, let's assume that they stay pat THIS year...
Since the DL class looks weak this year, I think you can rule out either a DT or DE (as of now) for our second round pick. The CB class looks to be the deepest -- and there sould be a quality player there for us. So I'd bank on CB... if not, then OL.
-
Remember, Wyche is the one who scouted him at the "Manning" workout and sold the team on drafting him, insisting he had a better workout than Eli.
-
Don't put too much stock in what this clown says. He's one of the "Sports Reporters" (along with Andy Poland) here in DC -- and he knows very little. Really just loves to hear himself talk.
-
Maybe when it's all said and Travis sees what he is REALLY worth in the market -- and comes back to the Bills with his tail between his legs.
-
Looking back, I think part of the gidiness about the 2002 draft was the acquisition of Drew Bledsoe -- and that the Bills managed to get him WITHOUT having to give up a draft pick THAT year.
While I know that DB's time in Buffalo has been mostly bad, there is no denying that his presence in 2002 brought INSTANT credibility to the team. Without that, I doubt that we attract the likes of Takeo and Big Sam via free agency. Also, without Bledsoe, Price's value does not get inflated and we don't obtain a 1st rounder for him via the Franchise Tag. Thus, while it is arguable that the specific trade for Bledsoe was a good one, I think that the related benefits I mentioned above would have to label it as such, thereby improving TD's 2002 draft grade.
And, if Mike Williams continues to improve and Josh Reed remembers what he used to do in college, we MAY actually look back on it is a rather GOOD draft.
-
Could it also be that the Travis Henry that the Raiders saw first hand in Week 2 -- the one who stumbled and fell tryng to punch it in from the 1 (which replays show he did anyway, but that's a different story) -- has given them ample reason to look elsewhere?
-
-
I agreee theNose76. That actress is perfect -- and I love her husky voice.
I have to say that I laughed out loud when Jack put on that ski mask prior to entering the convenience store.
-
Let me respond to each item one by one.
- Against Jacksonville and the Jets, the defense allowed a game-winning drive late in the fourth quarter
This is true... But for 3+ quarters the offense had done NOTHING. The defense was understandably out of gas for that final drive. Yes, the 1985 Bears defense would have found a way to preserve the win, but no one is arguing that the Bills D is THAT elite.
- The defense allowed New England to score 24 points in our first meeting, and suffered a complete collapse the second time the two teams played.
Recall that Terence McGee was pressed into action for the first time in that game when Troy Vincent went out. That left just one quality starter in the secondary (Nate Clements) as Milloy was out too. Suffice to say that a QB of Tom Brady's cailber was set to have a field day under such conditions -- and giving up 24 isn't THAT bad considering such circumstances.
Regarding the second game, you are right. It was a team-wide collapse against the defending Super Bowl Champs on the road in primetime against a team that seems to have our number.
- The defense allowed a back-breaking nine minute drive to Pittsburgh. Prior to that drive, the time of possession for both teams was about equal. The defense gets 100% of the blame for that drive.
Can't argue here... Again, this was an example of another game when NOTHING went right. Those types of days occur a few times a year, which is why NO TEAM has gone undefeated in the modern era.
-- That leaves just two losses--Baltimore and Oakland--in which the defense wasn't part of the problem. Neither of those teams are exactly known for having a great offense. This defense is good enough to get by with. But it's not good enough to carry the team.
I disagree about the Raiders. They were a much different team with Rich Gannon in there. In fact, the week before he had led them to 21 points on the road against the Steelers. Holding them to just 13 in Oakland was quality. As for the Ravens game, the defense can be blamed for 10 points. The other 10 game DIRECTLY from turnovers.
The old rule is that if the offense can score 17 -- and not turn over the ball, a good defense will ensure a victory. If the offense could have lived up to their end of the bargain each time out, the team would have gone 13-3. 'Nuff said.
Walmart and Unions
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
Here is a great Union Story for you.
I work as an IT Manager for a company in Northern Virginia. Last week my computer's hard drive died on me, and I needed a swap-out. So I put in a call to our internal Help Desk -- and they said they'd take care of it right away. Since I've got some important deadlines to meet, I asked them to put a rush on it.
An hour or so later, I got a phone call from the Help Desk informing me that they had the parts in hand. But that it would take TWO WEEKS to get my PC fixed. Why? Because the Help Desk employee (not union) was not allowed to physically bring the parts for my PC up to my office. Only a Union Employee could do that -- and the union employees claimed they wouldn't be able to get around to it for 2 weeks! When I asked if I could just walk down there myself and pick up the parts, the guy said no because the Union would file a grievance against me.
Since waiting 2 weeks was out of the question, I walked down to where the union guys were working. Did I find guys so busy that they couldn't possibly get to my situation for 2 weeks? Of course not. I found several employees sitting around doing nothing. Fortunately, I manged to sweet-talk one of them into by-passing the two week wait and picking up my PC parts and bringing them back to my office. The funniest part of this whole story is that is ALL that the union employee did. He just physically carried the parts. It was left to the help desk guy and myself (neither of whom is union) to unplug my machine, open up the case, and replace the parts...
This story is 100% true.