Jump to content

49er Fan

Community Member
  • Posts

    361
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 49er Fan

  1. On 9/8/2023 at 10:25 AM, Doc said:

     

    It's always the same tired stupid ***** with you libs.  The Republican candidate is "gonna put y'all back in chains," "Hitler," or "he could be worse than Trump."  Meanwhile the clowns you put in office continue to destroy the country under the guise of progressivism.  Congrats.

    How is the country being “destroyed” again?  Are you as poor and despondent as George Zimmerman or something?

    • Like (+1) 1
  2. 4 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

    So again let's recap for the King and other useful idiots..

     

    1. We have the IC memo, orchestrated by Tony Blinken, that in no uncertain terms states:

     

     we do not have evidence of Russian involvement 

     

    2. The subsequent reporting on the memo stating definitively, despite the memo saying no evidence exists, that the laptop contents are in fact Russian disinformation. 

     

    So King this leaves you the following options...

     

    A. The reporting by the media at large on the IC memo was accurate.

     

    B. The media at large got the reporting wrong because they didn't want to accurately report on it.

     

    C. The media at large got the story wrong because they were all stupendously incompetent simultaneously. 

     

    I guess you're still going with option C then?

     

    :lol:

    The “Hunter Biden Laptop” story received massive coverage *because* it was blocked by Twitter, so that point is completely irrelevant.  
     

    As far as its contents implicating Joe Biden, the current news is quite simply “Republican Inquiry Finds No Evidence of Wrongdoing by Biden.”

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  3. 34 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

     

     

     

     

    Censoring a news outlet about a story that was easily verifiable at the time by any honest and competent journalist. 

     

     

     

    What a laughable statement - over a year after first learning of the laptop, the FBI still hadn’t validated every file on it.  It also took actual newspapers like the WaPo and the NYT over a year to verify any of its contents.  Fox News / NYP doesn’t have anyone on staff able to do that.

    • Like (+1) 1
  4. 2 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

     

    Get off your high horse. Congressperson Jayapal and Congressperson Raskin tried to get votes thrown out from states Trump won.  Hillary pitched in her own money to do a recount.

     

    https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-democrats-house-democrats-electoral-college-election-2016-539801

     

    The donkey team did the same thing in the Bush/Gore election (trying to get votes thrown out).

     

    I am by no means defending the criminals on January 6th.  But at the same time the Donkey team likes to call the Elephant team election deniers when they do the same thing (deny election results when they lose, you just did it).  Makes me chuckle.  But carry on.

     

    And by the way, do you have any evidence "16 was rigged"?  When you said that do you know who you sounded. like?

     

    Donald J Trump.

     

     

    Sooooo…. why didn’t Bill Barr, Trump‘’s b—ch boy, appoint an independent counsel and have Clinton and Raskin investigated and charged with crimes like “conspiracy to violate rights” (Section 241 of Title 18)?

     

    Oh. 

    • Eyeroll 1
    • Agree 1
  5. 2 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
    • Russia was an attempt to remove him from office. There was no conspiracy, never was and that is borne out in the Mueller report.  In fact, AG Barr indicated the true conspiracy was undertaken by those who perpetrated the scam;
    • The Russia impeachment was unreasonable and unnecessary, and an attempt to remove Trump from office;

     

     

     


    First bullet - Russia interfered with our 2016 election on a massive scale vis social media bombardment (troll farms) and hacking.  Both candidate Clinton and DNC email servers were hacked and their contents were released at the direction of people working for Trump (e.g. Roger Stone).

     

    Second. bullet - There was no “Russia impeachment.” WTF are you talking about?  

     

    The Mueller investigation was undertaken by an independent counsel appointed by Trump’s first AG (Rod Rosenstein).  Trump obstructed justice so vehemently during the investigation that he wanted practically everyone having anything to do with it to be fired - and he made good on many of those wishes.

    • Agree 1
  6. 6 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

    there you are again confusing republicans with people that don't agree with the corporatism we currently have.

     

     

    Oh, ok.  But the fact that millions of Americans being drawn to the “evangelical” label because of its association with the G.O.P. is better?

  7. 40 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

    The status quo is failing the majority of US.

    Since when do Republicans care about the “majority of [the] U.S.?  What happened to the “pull yourself up by your bootstraps”mantra?”

     

    Or, to quote Mr. French in The Departed, “This is America! If you can’t make money, you’re a douchebag!”

  8. 17 minutes ago, sherpa said:

     

    His claim that he almost lost his wife, cat and Corvette in a housefire. Totally false.

    The details of a claim of a friendship and  conversations with an Amtrak conductor. Totally false.

    The claim that he convinced Strom Thurmond to vote for the Civil Rights Act when he was 21. Totally false.

    The claim that his grandfather died in the same hospital weeks before he was born. Totally false. 

    His claim of securing a Purple Heart for his Uncle Frank while Vice President. Probably false.

     

    I am not going to do a review of his plagiarism, which got him exposed during a failed attempt to run for president in 1988, or his ridiculously false claims about his academic record.

    The man has been lying and self aggrandizing for decades, and as his cognitive ability is in obvious decline, he simply has lost contact with reality. 

     

    Late edit.

    I forgot to add his lying claim that he was not presented with an option from DecDef and Chairman JCS to leave a 2000 person contingent to protect the disgraceful evacuation of Afghanistan. He was, and he lied about it.

    The difference between Trump the scumbag liar and Biden is that Biden’s “lies” as you put them, are harmless.  He embellishes personal stories or is forgetful.  And he actually tries to do the right thing with regard to governance.  He is not attacking anyone and everyone who disagrees with him or rage-tweeting with 16-year-old girls in the middle of the night. 

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Vomit 1
    • Haha (+1) 1
  9. 1 hour ago, ChiGoose said:

     

    Most Dems would probably prefer somebody else run. But because we have a two-party first-past-the-post system, nobody is going to want to challenge an incumbent in the primaries. So Biden is the only realistic option. Sucks, but it is what it is.

     

    I have no problem admitting that Biden is getting conspicuously too old to serve another term.  But there is also no reason for Democrats to immediately put forth a successor - or even worry about it - until next summer.  The Republican party is in utter shambles because it’s being held hostage by Trump.

     

    How can anyone possibly reconcile the fact that Trump is polling around 50% in the GOP primary while facing 91 felony indictments?  It’s the most laughable thing I’ve ever seen in my life.  The only two Republicans that are even willing to call this out are Christie and Hutchinson.  Even Liz Cheney, someone who voted with Trump over 90% of the time while serving as a Congresswoman, lost her WY seat and was completely ostracized from the party for daring to call Trump out on his misdeeds - and this was before any actual legal exposure.

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Thank you (+1) 2
  10. Trump and his minions are simply out of their element, up against people who aren't like the corrupt or weak schmucks they’ve had to deal with in the past. As for Trump, he has zero experience with this - accountability - and it's going to kill him, literally.  I don't give him more than a few years before he's gone.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Haha (+1) 1
  11. “…the history behind the 14th Amendment proves its general applicability. Conspiring, whether by violence or coercion, to overturn the outcome of an election is precisely what Confederate officers and officeholders did. They didn’t like the outcome of the 1860 election, so they tried to dismantle the United States, first by walking away, then by force.”

     

    “That was what Section 3 called ‘insurrection or rebellion’ against the United States government. It’s hard to argue that the same thing didn’t happen in the aftermath of the 2020 election. For symbolic measure, insurrectionists carried the Confederate battle flag into the Capitol on Jan. 6, marching in lock step with an earlier generation of Americans who aspired to end our system of government. That it was a bungled attempt, and that it didn’t work, doesn’t make it different.”

     

    Politico
     

     

    • Haha (+1) 2
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  12. 1 hour ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

    Because idiots think just claiming it was an insurrection 100 times makes it one and fantasize that 14A will keep Trump from running. Why do the Dems have such an obsession to keep Trumpoff the ballot while at the same time they say he can't win?  They should be welcoming his participation if they believe their own story.

    The two most prominent advocates of the 14th Amendment clause barring Trunp from running again are conservative legal scholars affiliated with the Federalist Society — William Baude of the University of Chicago and Michael Stokes Paulsen of the University of St. Thomas.

     

    Trunp will never stop running - when he loses in 2024 he’ll try again in 2028 and raise plenty of money doing it.  People will vote for him when he’s dead because those same people won’t believe that he’s dead.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Haha (+1) 1
  13. 1 hour ago, Kemp said:

    Well at least Rudy foreshadowed himself “being made a fool of”:

     

    ”Over the next 10 days, we get to see the machines that are crooked, the ballots that are fraudulent, and if we’re wrong, we will be made fools of. But if we’re right, a lot of them will go to jail. Let’s have trial by combat. I’m willing to stake my reputation, the President is willing to stake his reputation, on the fact that we’re going to find criminality there.”

  14. 1 hour ago, B-Man said:

    That, dearie, is because no president has ever persecuted his opponent. None. 

     

    For the millionth time, Biden is not “persecuting” Trump.  Local District Attorneys and a Special Counsel are prosecuting him after grand juries returned indictments.  
     

    And you’re wrong.  TRUMP tried to extort Ukraine’s president to announce an investigation against BIDEN.  Didn’t even care if it was real or not, he just wanted Zelenskyy in a “public box” announcing it to the world.  Guess you missed the actual facts on that for believing, like a f—king idiot, that Trump’s phone call to Zelenskyy was “perfect.”

    • Like (+1) 3
    • Eyeroll 1
    • Haha (+1) 1
  15. 2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

    I haven't been looking.  Where's the evidence?  Or is this just another one of your hoaxes?

    Got the evidence?  Or is this just another "HCQ is an effective treatment for COVID" type of thing?

    Reminds me of when the CDC had to issue a public statement about taking ivermectin to treat Covid:  “You are not a horse.” 😂😂

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  16. 24 minutes ago, wnyguy said:

    Just open your eyes man, it's pretty obvious to most.

    Chuck Grassley on Fox News: "We are not interested in whether the allegations against Vice President Biden are accurate or not."

     

    Huh? What a weak, pitiful statement.
     

    “Biden’s utter lack of involvement [in his son’s business deals] matches testimony from multiple supposed whistleblowers. Republicans have heard testimony from IRS agents, Hunter’s former business partner Devon Archer, and former Rudy Giuliani associate Lev Parnas.  None of them was able to provide concrete evidence that Biden was involved in his son’s business. In fact, both Archer and Parnas said nothing could be further from the truth.”

     

    The desperation is funny.  I doubt even a (R) House majority would vote to impeach Biden, obviously the Senate vote would be partisan.

  17. On 8/22/2023 at 1:32 PM, B-Man said:

     

    It’s not going to be moved.   None of the people indicted in this case - least of all Trump - were performing official Federal government duties or had roles relating to the legitimate electoral college.  
     

    Now say, if Mike Pence had done something incredibly stupid on 1/6/2021 and had not just counted the electoral votes in his ceremonial role per the Constitution, *he* would be charged with Federal crime(s).

    • Vomit 2
  18. 51 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

     

    I don't believe he can, or more accurately put, he can't be allowed to win.

     

    The sham indictments are only the beginning. They will stop at nothing to prevent him from winning. The out in the open rigging every non useful idiot observed in 2020 will look like child's play compared to what's coming.

    The indictments against Trump are hardly “shams.”  You haven’t even looked at them.  Prosecutors don’t waste their valuable time bringing  cases outside of the law and evidence.


    And, who is “they?”


    You have no answer except “ThE dEeP sTaTe.” You know you can’t even name someone because of how ludicrous it is.  Hillary? Obama? Garland?  Who is “conspiring” to keep Trump out of office besides American citizens who vote?

     

    No one is preventing Trump from running.  He can run from jail, and he has said he would if it came to that.

     

    The “republic” is fine, your tinfoil hat is just on too tight.

    • Vomit 1
    • Agree 2
    • Dislike 1
  19. 1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

    :lol:

     

     

    Why are you even citing polls at all?  It’s 2023.  
     

    I want to carry around a bullhorn and shout at people like you, in your face, “TRUMP ISN’’T WINNING S—T.”

     

    Get it through your thick skull.  He’s DONE.   Do you live in North Carolina?  He probably will lose that state in 2024 (if he’s the nominee and the state even allows him on the ballot).

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Vomit 2
    • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...