Jump to content

Chimp

Community Member
  • Posts

    658
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Chimp

  1. 6 hours ago, MrEpsYtown said:

    I thought it might be a fun exercise for us look at some of our hits and misses over the years. We all have opinions about all of the quarterbacks in this draft, but I'm sure we have all been wrong at times over the years.  Pretty much every year I fall in love with a quarterback, sometimes those guys have turned out to be pretty good and other times they’ve been awful. My earliest draft memories probably start at the 93 draft as an 11 year old. I’ve been watching and obsessing over the draft ever since. 

     

    93: Drew Bledsoe was my second football love after Jim Kelly. I thought he was going to be awesome and went on to have a pretty good career. I was ecstatic when we acquired Bledsoe, even though he was thirty at that point. 

     

    94: Heath Shuler: I thought he was going to be the man. So athletic and watching his games at Tennessee I thought he would be the real deal. 

     

    95: I was a big PSU fan because my uncle went there and I really liked Kerry Collins. I did not think McNair was going to be good as a small school guy. Kerry Collins was ok but I was definitely wrong on McNair. We drafted Todd Collins in the second.  

     

    96: This might be the worst QB drafts of all time. First guy off the board was Tony Banks in the second. I don’t recall liking any QBs in this draft. I remember really wanted Terry Glenn and being disappointed with Moulds. 

     

    97: Loved Jake Plummer but I thought Jim Druckenmiller was going to be the better pro. 

     

    98: Peyton Manning was obvious, but I thought Leaf was going to be good too. I feel like that was a fair debate at the time. 

     

    99: Cade McNown was my favorite. He was a lefty and really athletic and fun. I thought Couch would be good too. I wasn't sold on McNabb or Akili Smith. I remember really wanting Andy Katzenmoyer, like a lot and being disappointed when we passed on him for Antoine Winfield. 

     

    2000: Nobody special came out of this draft…....but I loved Giovanni Carmazzi. Steve Mariucci ruined him. 

     

    2001: I really wanted Drew Brees. I was basically obsessed with him at Purdue. 

     

    2002: I badly wanted Joey Harrington and he went one pick before ours. I really think Mariucci ruined him too and he should have  had a better career. I thought we might grab Patrick Ramsey in the  2nd. I thought he’d be good too. 

     

    2003: Kyle Boller was my guy in this draft. Huge arm. 

     

    2004: I felt the top guys were out of reach, so I was actually okay with JP Losman. I did not like the trade up though. I think we could have waited until the second. Still the wrong pick though. 

     

    2005: That trade up cost us a shot at Aaron Rodgers, who I thought was really good. 

     

    2006: I liked Vince Young in this draft. 

     

    2007: I loved Brady Quinn, but really wanted Patrick Willis. I didn't love the Marshawn selection. I did not think there was any way Quinn would bust. 

     

    2008: I loved Brian Brohm and felt really good about Colt Brennan. 

     

    2009: I did not like anyone, but certainly did not want Aaron Maybin.

     

    2010: A lot of rumors had us loving Tim Tebow so I convinced myself to like him. I really wanted Jimmy Clausen. I could not believe we passed on him in the second. 

     

    2011: This one I am not proud of. I thought Cam was out of reach and I loved Blaine Gabbert, Absolutely loved him. He was like the prototype for me. I was upset when we passed on him, but I understood the Dareus pick. After the first day I convinced myself we were going to draft Colin Kaepernick, and I was ecstatic, then we drafted Aaron Williams and I was super pissed. 

     

    2012: I spent the entire offseason dreaming of trade ups for Luck that obviously didn't happen. After him I wanted Brock Osweiler late. 

     

    2013: I wanted Matt Barkley. Hated the EJ pick. Still surprised Barkley never amounted to anything and shocked he went in the 4th. 

     

    2014: I was hoping Teddy Bridgewater would somehow slip to us in the 2nd. 

     

    2015: I liked Bryce Petty and I thought Brett Hundley would be good as well. 

     

    2016: I wanted Christian Hackenberg. I thought he had the pedigree as a prospect and was just really young for the draft. 

     

    2017: I was intrigued by Mahomes, but was okay with the trade down. 

     

    So for me it's a lot of hit or miss. I really loved prospects like Joey Harrington and Blaine Gabbert and was banging the table for Brady Quinn, but also had a couple of hits like Drew Brees. But I have been pretty wrong a lot. Just putting it all out there as fun. 

     

    This year I am all in on Josh Rosen. 

     

    It’s all a crapshoot. Who are some of your hits and embarrassing misses over the years? 
     

    Big Ben.  Watched him a ton at Miami of Ohio and loved him.  Was convinced that Limas Sweed was going to be an absolute stud.

  2. On 1/23/2018 at 9:08 PM, MrEpsYtown said:

    Thanks this is why I brought the issue up in the first place. The situation feels strange to me and I'm just some fan. I would imagine it wouldn't sit well with NFL excecutives. 

     

    C'mon man the details of his lateness came out a few hours after my post. I wish I was psychic. 

    fair enough, I retract my sarcasm...is that a thing?

    • Like (+1) 1
  3. 6 hours ago, MrEpsYtown said:

     

    Good points, but why not just skip the whole thing then? Say he's going to focus on the combine like everyone else always does. If everybody knows he's 5'11" then he should just get measured. 

     

    I get what the agent is trying to do, but it just seems wishy-washy to me. Plus he showed up late...to me that's like the guys who get a positive drug test at the combine. It's just dumb.  

    Definite character issue.  To think someone would be with their mother in the hospital rather than at a meaningless football game.  Oh the humanity.

  4. 8 hours ago, JerseyBills said:

    Sure why not. I see ppl claiming they won't tune in because NE made another SB. Sorry to say, they deserved that game. I hate them as much as the next man. But their defense and offense outplayed the young Jags when it mattered.

     

    Jax was 6/10 on 3rd down going into the 4th qtr . 0 for in the 4th, giving up 14 points, I saw ONE questionable call by refs that I actually agreed with, so I think this should be re assessed in a week or so when people cool down and are not in their emotions so much. NE deserved the W if I'm being real.

    Totally agree.  The nfl is less enticing to me with each passing year.  I'm not certain but I am leaning toward not.

  5. 1 minute ago, NewEra said:

     

    You asked a question I answered it.  We didn’t spy.  We lost.  There’s no way to go back and see what would’ve happened if we did, but I know what happened when we didn’t. We gave up 10 points because he ran for 1st down after 1st down.  That was their entire offense.

    I asked a practical question.  You asked a general question. Don't take this as me being a jerk, I don't intend to be.  I just can't believe an nfl coach wouldn't consider a spy.  Chances are good they thought through it and must have had a reason to not spy him.

  6. 2 hours ago, Livinginthepast said:

    Exactly!! All these people saying that not spying the QB wasn't relevant are missing the point hugely. If they had adjusted and spied Bortles, he doesn't get those first downs and they don't get ANY points. So yeah giving up 10pts is great, but giving up ZERO pts is considerably better when your team cannot get anything done on offense. Also Spying Bortles  would have forced him into his usual bad decisions and he might have actually thrown some INTS, which for us was one of the keys to victory today and all year. 

    Who would spy him?  No linebacker on the field today is fast enough.

  7. 1 hour ago, billsfan89 said:

     

    Oh !@#$ off with this sophistry. Blue States send more money to the federal government than they receive back, now that gap is going to be even wider. The Blue States were already subsidizing the Red States most of whom got back more money from the feds than they pay in. Now that gap is going to be bigger and for what? To build infrastructure that is desperately needed? To lower the national deficits which would stabilize the future? Maybe it is to help out people dealing with medical bankruptcy or crippling student debt, we bailed out the banks, why not bail out the consumer?

     

    No, we are taking on all this debt to give a tax cut that mostly benefits corporations and the rich who are doing by far better than they have been in nearly all of modern history. Corporate Reserves and cash on hand are at record highs, they aren't investing money they are mostly taking their record profits and giving it back to investors a large chunk of whom are foreigners. This is a massive extraction of wealth outside of he country. The fact that the corporate and top earner rates are the permanent rates and the middle-class tax cuts expire shows you were the real priorities of the party that cut this plan are. 

     

    You can't write your local taxes beyond 10k, it's a federal tax code. The only thing a state can do is allow you to write off your property tax against your state tax, but that's not going to make up the difference at all. 

     

    I know it's a deduction, you don't get it subtracted from your federal taxes. I mainly said that it alleviated the costs as if you were a high earner in NY state you could at least deduct a large amount of taxes you paid to the state against your federal bill. It obviously wouldn't give you the full amount back but getting a portion back is better than the nothing they will get now. 

    Hence the pa part.  My local taxes including income are 3500.  1% income and 1580 on a 2400 Sq ft house on 9 acres.

  8. 15 hours ago, billsfan89 said:

     

     

    I think you grossly overestimate state taxes. I think California has the highest state tax and it's in the range of 10% at the highest income bracket. No state takes 20% of your money via income tax. No matter what you still have to pay federal taxes. And up until Trump !@#$ed over everybody you use to be able to write off your state and local taxes fully against your federal taxes, which for high gross income earners deeply helped alleviate that cost. 

     

    Also I think that as another poster mentioned that you get taxed by which state you play your games in. I would also add in the fact that a lot of teams in higher taxed states have no issues recruiting players. 

    I can still write mine off.  Pa resident.  You don't have to stay where you are do you?  Come to PA

  9. 5 hours ago, westerndecline said:

    They havent been caught cheating again ...

     

    You do realize that they've already been caught three times right it's not a conspiracy it's not speculation that actually happened and Goodell conspire to destroy the evidence so did Brady what you're talking about has already happened and now with everything we know that has happened in the past we have some random guy from New York overturning calls in favor of the Patriots that's not a red flag to you

    Arguing with a jackass is never a good idea man.

  10. 20 hours ago, That's No Moon said:

    Anybody else see the commercial for the NFL playoffs last night?  The one that was done like a theatrical trailer and listed "the Seattle Seahawks" as one of the stars?  Seahawks haven't made the playoffs yet.  Not only do they need to win next week, they need Carolina to also win. Anybody wanna bet they will?

     

     

    Nope but I would bet my house on it.

  11. 1 hour ago, BADOLBILZ said:

     

    He often had very talented teams and was known for losing important games.

     

    Despite clear talent and big numbers whether he was a good enough QB to lead the Cowboys to a title was oft-questioned to say the least.

     

    His Cowboys routinely underachieved......but once he did get homefield advantage with Wade as his HC.........and IMMEDIATELY lost.

     

    Also had great talent around him last year when he took that outrageously stupid preseason hit that knocked him into retirement.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    You want an assertion.......how about that Tony Romo has probably been THE MOST SCRUTINIZED decision-making QB in NFL history.:lol:

     

    His career was LITTERED with instances of bone-head decisions where he trusted his arm or body far too much.

     

    Tyrod and Romo are on two opposite sides of the decision making spectrum.

     

    Neither will probably ever win a SB...........but we already know one of them will never even reach a championship game LET ALONE a SB.

     

    Amirite or amirite?

     

    Romo and Rex are both excellent analysts though...........just more entertaining than right.:thumbsup:

     

    As the old timers say who the he'll do you think you are?  I wish we had a jackass emoji

×
×
  • Create New...