dubs
-
Posts
4,015 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by dubs
-
-
I’m a fan of fans of bills fans!
-
1
-
-
1996 - Clinton
2000 - Gore
2004 - Kerry
2008 - Obama
2012 - Romney
2016 - Trump
as you can see, I’ve never voted “republican”
-
2
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:
Even worse when you consider he made it just hours after declaring he was leaving the board
The best part though was the feeding frenzy of the EXACT posters you'd expect that swarmed to this thread when it was pointed out.
When your only allies are the bottom of the barrel trolls, there's a chance you're PPP'ing incorrectly.
I've been extremely busy and been largely off the board for the last couple weeks and this was the first thread I saw when I came back. Just an all around embarrassment.
it’s clear the intention is to clutter the board with nonsense to the point where it’s so frustrating people disengage on the board.
-
3
-
-
What a stupid thread topic. Pure secondhand embarrassment for the OP.
-
2
-
-
I haven't really been paying close attention to camp but kind of surprised TJ Yeldon is still on this team.
Also kind of surprised Jake Fromm made the team.
Maybe it's obvious from the above that I didn't pay any attention to camp.
Go Biils! Let's roll!
-
She needs to resign. I mean, not that she had any credibility before, but even NPCs have to see how incredibly phucked up this is, right? I know, wishful thinking.
-
1
-
-
-
9 hours ago, SectionC3 said:
Many of you have claimed expertise in identifying communists in general and communist arsonists in particular. I have asked for tips and insight to improve my own ability to identify communists and communist arsonists.
Unfortunately nobody was forthcoming with such advice. Surely this is just because the “experts” in this area are secretive, and not because they’re making this “communist arsonist” issue up out of thin air.
So I had to do my own research. It turns out that these are telltale signs of communists:
*uses unusual language;
*clings to ideals without being willing to question them;
*condemns American institutions;
*picks on insignificant events for criticism;
*secretive; and
*belongs to groups exploiting controversial subjects.
Over the weekend I identified a couple of guys who fit the criteria. They use unusual language (racial slurs), cling to stupid ideas (racism), condemn at least one American institution (the First Amendment), pick on an insignificant event for criticisms (a bunch of people walking and talking about equal rights), secretive (they don’t have name tags on, right?), and belong to a group exploiting controversial subjects (they left their red hats in the car, but they have them).
They’re pictured here:
Discuss.
Oh, and also, applying those criteria, I think that some of you might be communists. FYI.
you could start by looking in the mirror -
Wonder what’s on the Cuomo/Cohen tapes? Tucker releasing tomorrow perhaps?
-
-
Here’s C-Section!
-
2
-
-
STOP WITH THE NEW THREADS YOU SIMP!
-
The dem party is dead. A house dropped on them in the 1939!
They’ve been replaced by their sister, the international communist party, and she’s more wicked than the first.
-
57 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:I am not sure but I think you are stating that since not all Dem run cities are on fire pointing out that all of the cities that are on fire are Dem run is inappropriate. Is that your overall point?
don’t lawyers need to take a logic course in law school? The point you made is pretty basic logic that I would expect any lawyer to understand. Even a fourth rate third chair one. -
I appreciate the OP’s honesty in describing the riots in Wisconsin as domestic terrorism.
-
1
-
-
20 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said:
I only ask you this question..sincerely.
If a 17 yr old black teen with semi automatic rifle walked down that Wisconsin street a d shot 2 white men who appeared to be creating damage what would the discussion be. I think a lot more questions would be asked before accepting the same outcome.
I wish this black man had acted the same way as Rittenhouse and that he was still alive today.
-
3
-
-
-
6 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said:
This is where you are wrong about me. I am not a lib or lefty, or socialist.
It is my belief that trump is not the man for the job, he is not capable of leading the country. A President should govern for the country not just those who voted for his party.
Pelosi is far worse than trump. She even blocked her own guy...Obama.
Obama was very weak leader and his own party stopped him. Obama and trump are incapable of development of lasting alliances or building trust.
trump is not the man for the job...He is openly untrustworthy.
the government role in the US has been so bastardized over the last 100 years that it does not remotely resemble the intention and design laid out in the constitution. The process of governing has been screwed up, the role of states vs fed, everything. Until that’s fixed, you’re going to see this hysteria play out over and over again because of the power and control that the presidency has but was never intended to have.
To make matters even worse, the media is just thinly veiled propaganda (mostly for the left) and the citizenry has no concept of civics.
in other words, it’s a !@#$ mess.
-
1
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, RiotAct said:
In the minds of some people, yes.
I just don’t understand that mindset.
maybe there is more information out there that would make this more clearly a police brutality issue, which is why I’d want to wait before really making up my mind, but there’s been such a rush to condemn the cops.
-
1
-
-
I have a really simple, honest question regarding the shooting that prompted this latest rioting and am not going through the entire thread to see if this has been asked and answered.
If the guy resisted arrest, was tazed, and still managed to get to his car, how are the cops supposed to know he’s not going there to pull out a gun? Are they supposed to wait and see if he pulls out a gun and hope they can shoot him before he starts shooting at the cops or anybody else nearby?
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Niagara Bill said:
Sorry dubs but cannot agree.
In any society the actions of this cop are wrong.
If he had the weapon I get it...
He may be drunk, high, a criminal, violent etc.
3 kids standing there,
There is no crime short of murder that demands this type of over reaction at this stage of the confrontation.
I am a law and order type...but not this type
how is the cop supposed to know what he’s reaching for in his car? There are countless situations that end badly for the cops, the perpetrator, and innocent bystanders because cops didn’t stop someone.
At this point, we need to wait and see what the details are, but it’s just as plausible that the cops were justified as it is that they were not.
which is why the inflammatory nature of narratives needs to end.
-
16 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said:
Not siding with a criminal. They didn't shoot Jeffrey Dahlmer in the back 7 times.
There is no way you can justify your hatred or the action of this professional cop.
I hate crime too. I hate gangs, I hate drugs, I hate violence and I hate guns.
But I equally hate racism.
I do find it interesting that you think this is a political issue.
you are siding with a criminal.ill wait for more information and in the meantime understand that it’s entirely plausible that the cops were called to respond to a domestic incident, involving someone with a previous criminal record, who proceeded to fight the cops, refused to comply, threaten the cops, and went to his car which had the interior concealed from the cops to get a weapon and use it against the police.
I feel bad for people so manipulated by race hustlers, the Pravda media, and meaningless slogans. They clearly lack any ability to think for themselves and are manipulated to the point that they emotionally react without any consideration of reality.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Good idea for brand new thread, definitely couldn’t have put this half-baked gibberish into one of dozens of other threads talking about race. classic c-section.
-
5
-
1
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, RiotAct said:
Pandemic is OVAH!!!!!
Mayor Bowser’s comments... cringe.
Thomas Sowell - Quote of the Day
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted