Jump to content

aristocrat

Community Member
  • Posts

    14,791
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by aristocrat

  1. 8 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

    Trump is in court all the time, rightfully so. He's a criminal trying to undermine our country. Putin loves him and he loves Putin. Why? Because they both hate free societies 

    Specifically how did trump create a less free society? 

  2. 4 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


    Wrong. 
     

    I never claimed it was only republicans causing violence. That’s just projection on your part. 
     

    My claim is that more guns = more gun deaths. Which is correct and supported by the data. 
     

    The only reason I mentioned anything about parties is to refute the obviously wrong claim that Dems drive violence. 


    but the members of your party are the ones commuting the higher rates of violence. Why?  Since you’re the data guy explain why the data shows the higher rates of gun crimes for certain groups of people? It’s against the law to use a gun in a crime. 

  3. 1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:

    And why do you think this is the case? Do you have any proposed solutions?

    Well your claim is it’s only republicans doing the violence. These groups of people aren’t republicans. They vote democrat. So perhaps instead of blaming republicans change your tune. Don’t be a ***** moron. 

  4. 7 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


    You answer but your answer makes no sense and isn’t backed by reality or data. 
     

    I find it hilarious that you accuse *me* of cherry picking when that’s all you’ve got. It’s literally what you’re doing right now. 
     

    We know state laws do have impacts on crime, studies show this. You ignore it because it doesn’t fit the answer you want to be true. 
     

    If Dems caused violence, NYC would be the most violent place in the country. The most dangerous places would be ones controlled entirely by the Dems. But they aren’t, so you’re just flat wrong. 


    The ones with the guns. 

    https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/72/wr/mm7226a9.htm

  5. 9 hours ago, ChiGoose said:


    Let me ask you in a general sense - if Dems cause crime, why are the most dangerous counties in the country not in states run by the Dems?

    Since you brought up data. Who’s doing the shooting? Is there a specific group of people who commit a higher percentage of the shooting crimes? Come on dive into the data 

  6. 5 hours ago, ChiGoose said:


    The idea that liberals are the cause of violence is just objectively and provably false. 
     

    If it were true, NYC would be the deadliest place in the country. The list of deadliest counties would be just counties from states like New York, California, Vermont, Massachusetts, and Hawaii. 

    The fact that the list is made up almost entirely of municipalities from red states simply proves you wrong. 

     

    It really just seems like you’ve decided that it’s all the fault of the Dems so you’re cherry picking evidence and ignoring anything to the contrary. 
     

    The evidence just actually points to: more guns = more gun deaths. The fact that the deadliest places are the densest places in states with loose gun laws supports that and refutes your claim. 


    who’s doing the shooting? Specifically who?

  7. 2 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

    Oh look you said big guy and that got the monkeys excited!  Almost as excited they get when they regurgitate any story reflecting negatively on Ukraine.  Oh how i envy the simple-minded.  

     

    I don't know what Joe's plan is in terms of getting members to spend more.  I do hope he does something.  Not threatening to not help Nato members if attacked, I'm not an imbecile, but certainly he has economic and diplomatic levers at his disposal.  They'll regret it if there's escalation that's for certain.

     

     

     

    So in 2014 3 countries contributed the 2 percent. Now it’s 18 and the rest have plans to get there. So it worked. 
     

     

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Agree 1
  8. On 5/4/2024 at 9:45 AM, ChiGoose said:

     “The guy who hates NATO and supplicants himself before Putin would absolutely have defended NATO in a hot war against Putin” is quite the take. 

    You understand he hated the countries that weren’t paying their fare share right? Then they started paying up cause they were called out. This strengthening NATO. But you knew that

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  9. 29 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

     

     

    Eric Moulds.

     

    He didn't start out as well as Claypool did........but he spent his first couple seasons slapping women around,  dodging child support claims and just being a general unfocused idiot until he decided to put his foot in the ground and make himself into something as a professional.    

    Good example. Would be real nice if we hit the lotto once on a reclamation project 

    • Agree 3
  10. 22 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

     

     

    Carter was an alcoholic.   Quitting the booze was the key to turning his career around,  not trying harder.   I haven't heard anything like that about Claypool.   I think apathy is his issue.

    True. But he got his career back on track. Carter was the best example of turning his career around that I could think of. 

    • Like (+1) 2
  11. Claypool should call up cris Carter on how to resurrect his career.  Kid is only 25 so he’s gotta figure out how to get back to his form from the first couple years in the league. He’s got the talent size and speed so there is some hope he can get it together. Little risk lots of potential 

    • Like (+1) 5
    • Agree 3
  12. 4 minutes ago, teef said:

    Romo just figured he’d write everything off.  What a jackass. 

     

    right?  did they not have an accountant going....guys this is not how it works lol. 

×
×
  • Create New...