Jump to content

aristocrat

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    14,733

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by aristocrat

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    5 hours ago, ChiGoose said:


    The idea that liberals are the cause of violence is just objectively and provably false. 
     

    If it were true, NYC would be the deadliest place in the country. The list of deadliest counties would be just counties from states like New York, California, Vermont, Massachusetts, and Hawaii. 

    The fact that the list is made up almost entirely of municipalities from red states simply proves you wrong. 

     

    It really just seems like you’ve decided that it’s all the fault of the Dems so you’re cherry picking evidence and ignoring anything to the contrary. 
     

    The evidence just actually points to: more guns = more gun deaths. The fact that the deadliest places are the densest places in states with loose gun laws supports that and refutes your claim. 


    who’s doing the shooting? Specifically who?

    Democracy’s Fiery Ordeal: The War in Ukraine 🇺🇦

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    2 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

    Oh look you said big guy and that got the monkeys excited!  Almost as excited they get when they regurgitate any story reflecting negatively on Ukraine.  Oh how i envy the simple-minded.  

     

    I don't know what Joe's plan is in terms of getting members to spend more.  I do hope he does something.  Not threatening to not help Nato members if attacked, I'm not an imbecile, but certainly he has economic and diplomatic levers at his disposal.  They'll regret it if there's escalation that's for certain.

     

     

     

    So in 2014 3 countries contributed the 2 percent. Now it’s 18 and the rest have plans to get there. So it worked. 
     

     

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1

    Bills sign Chase Claypool, Smoot, Jones

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    29 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

     

     

    Eric Moulds.

     

    He didn't start out as well as Claypool did........but he spent his first couple seasons slapping women around,  dodging child support claims and just being a general unfocused idiot until he decided to put his foot in the ground and make himself into something as a professional.    

    Good example. Would be real nice if we hit the lotto once on a reclamation project 

    • Agree 3

    Bills sign Chase Claypool, Smoot, Jones

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    22 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

     

     

    Carter was an alcoholic.   Quitting the booze was the key to turning his career around,  not trying harder.   I haven't heard anything like that about Claypool.   I think apathy is his issue.

    True. But he got his career back on track. Carter was the best example of turning his career around that I could think of. 

    • Like (+1) 2

    Bills sign Chase Claypool, Smoot, Jones

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    Claypool should call up cris Carter on how to resurrect his career.  Kid is only 25 so he’s gotta figure out how to get back to his form from the first couple years in the league. He’s got the talent size and speed so there is some hope he can get it together. Little risk lots of potential 

    • Like (+1) 5
    • Agree 3

    Romo goes banco

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    4 minutes ago, teef said:

    Romo just figured he’d write everything off.  What a jackass. 

     

    right?  did they not have an accountant going....guys this is not how it works lol. 

    Jacksonville releases Zay Jones. Homecoming?

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    Hung out with him one night in Raleigh. Super nice guy even though I made a ***** comment to him which he thank god he laughed off. I took a risk on a joke and if it went bad he would have killed me. All he wanted to talk about was the Sabres who were playing that night and we left the game early cause they were getting smoked 

    Did we do enough at wide receiver?

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    7 hours ago, GASabresIUFan said:

    Other then injury replacements, do we really need any other receivers?  Last season our WR 4 & WR 5 had 21 & 22 targets  respectively.  In 2022 WR 4 had 20 targets and WR 5-9 had 30 targets total.  in 2021 Davis was WR 4 and had a banner year with 63 targets, McKenzie at WR 3 had 28.  

     

    This coming season we already have 4 talented pass catchers and won't be relaying on the 4th WR to be Davis.  If I had to guess Kincaid, Coleman, Samuel & Shakir will take the vast majority of the targets (70 to 110 each) with Cook as the 5th most likely target (about 50-60 targets).  After them we have Knox who will see around 40 targets or more and Hollins who is perfectly capable of catching 30-40 balls as well if needed (he caught 57 w LVR in 2022).  So what do we really need beyond those 7 players?  That seems like more than enough depth for Josh.  

     

    Shorter, Hamler, Cephus, and the rest of the cannon fodder are competing for the WR5 role, which is a nothing burger.  Over the last 5 years, the WR5 has averaged 23 targets a season.  Is this someone we are really worried about?

     

    Hollins has one season two years ago where he caught 57 balls. The next best season is a few with 16 grabs. We lost two receivers who combined for 15 tds on the year. We better hope Coleman can come in and replace Gabe's tds. Kincaid should be good for a few more and Samuel with a legit qb for the first time should put a good amount of tds.   I still think we need to add a vet wr outside like DJ Chark and we can really have an offense that can get into a shootout so we don't have to rely on Allen running so much. 

    • Agree 3
×
×
  • Create New...