The way I look at it: if you need 43 replays (which is about how many I think they showed of the first review, of the incomplete pass that was initially ruled a fumble) to determine that conclusive evidence exists to overturn...then by definition it is inconclusive. Felt to me like Bogar was looking hard for any possible shred that would overturn what he probably, in his heart, thought was a blown on-field call.
And if New England were the opponent? All three.