Tipster19 Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Denver traded Tatum Bell with only having two Rbs on their roster, Mike Bell and Cedric Cobb. Mike Bell was a rookie last year and seemed to wear down by year's end. Cedric Cobb had a whopping 3 carries for 9 yards. That's pretty gutsy. If no one steps up in a trade offer for Willis, then we don't have to trade him. That's not a bad situation to be in but if we do get a fair offer then expect McGahee to be traded. They are talking to A-Train on a new contract as we speak. While Thomas may not be the answer as a every down back he is effective in a shared role. Detroit is rumored to be entertaining offers for Tatum Bell. Would a 4th rd pick be fair compensation? Although the Bills don't have a 5th rd pick, they could afford a 4th rder and be looking for a 2nd or possibly even a early 3rd rd pick for McGahee. Having our 1st, 2nd and 3rd rder intact, the trade compensation for McGahee, and acquiring Tatum Bell with our 4th rder would leave us in good shape to still address our other needs and still select a RB of the future in the 1st or 2nd rd if we so desire. http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20070304/2060791.asp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-Gun10 Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Denver traded Tatum Bell with only having two Rbs on their roster, Mike Bell and Cedric Cobb. Mike Bell was a rookie last year and seemed to wear down by year's end. Cedric Cobb had a whopping 3 carries for 9 yards. That's pretty gutsy. If no one steps up in a trade offer for Willis, then we don't have to trade him. That's not a bad situation to be in but if we do get a fair offer then expect McGahee to be traded. They are talking to A-Train on a new contract as we speak. While Thomas may not be the answer as a every down back he is effective in a shared role. Detroit is rumored to be entertaining offers for Tatum Bell. Would a 4th rd pick be fair compensation? Although the Bills don't have a 5th rd pick, they could afford a 4th rder and be looking for a 2nd or possibly even a early 3rd rd pick for McGahee. Having our 1st, 2nd and 3rd rder intact, the trade compensation for McGahee, and acquiring Tatum Bell with our 4th rder would leave us in good shape to still address our other needs and still select a RB of the future in the 1st or 2nd rd if we so desire. http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20070304/2060791.asp I dont know about u but i dont want Mike Bell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
t.o. alllll day Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 I dont know about u but i dont want Mike Bell. he talking about gettin tatum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JStranger76 Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 I'd trade a 4th for Tatum Bell and sign someone like TJ Duckett to pair him with. That would be a solid 1-2 punch, plus allow a McGahee trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts