crackur Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 It's Crowell, not Haggans, and I find Parrish, Reed to be a better fit 648369[/snapback] crowell is still here he is talking about who we lost...........we lost haggan.....a special teamer or something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
34-78-83 Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 crowell is still here he is talking about who we lost...........we lost haggan.....a special teamer or something 648975[/snapback] I'm pretty sure we re-signed Haggan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 The reason these idiotic polls stay alive is because idiotic people actually respond to them with the exact same idiotic thing they put into the last identical idiotic poll. Did something change because it was said again for the 957th time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 The reason these idiotic polls stay alive is because idiotic people actually respond to them with the exact same idiotic thing they put into the last identical idiotic poll. Did something change because it was said again for the 957th time? 648986[/snapback] Trouble is, somebody relatively new to TSW doesn't *know* there have been 956 previous threads. (And not to pick solely on the newbies, some long-time regulars could learn to use the "search" function a little more often themselves.) I think we've been more proactive lately in merging threads, like the three different Sam-Adams-to-Cincy ones I jammed together last night. Still a work in progress, though... and one not helped by the kind of crap that inundated the board yesterday afternoon. But hey, glad everyone had fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 Trouble is, somebody relatively new to TSW doesn't *know* there have been 956 previous threads. (And not to pick solely on the newbies, some long-time regulars could learn to use the "search" function a little more often themselves.) I think we've been more proactive lately in merging threads, like the three different Sam-Adams-to-Cincy ones I jammed together last night. Still a work in progress, though... and one not helped by the kind of crap that inundated the board yesterday afternoon. But hey, glad everyone had fun. 649012[/snapback] It's also called "Read". At least the first page, at least. Before one runs their mouth. That said, you also know I'm an ass, don't really care, and make my comments because I'm very cynical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 It's also called "Read". At least the first page, at least. Before one runs their mouth. That said, you also know I'm an ass, don't really care, and make my comments because I'm very cynical. 649018[/snapback] Agreed. Both parts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gross Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 Trouble is, somebody relatively new to TSW doesn't *know* there have been 956 previous threads. (And not to pick solely on the newbies, some long-time regulars could learn to use the "search" function a little more often themselves.) I think we've been more proactive lately in merging threads, like the three different Sam-Adams-to-Cincy ones I jammed together last night. Still a work in progress, though... and one not helped by the kind of crap that inundated the board yesterday afternoon. But hey, glad everyone had fun. 649012[/snapback] I was quite the merge monster, then gave up this weekend. Though I did merge the half dozen or so "Clayton/ESPN/ESPN Radio/Philly Radio Reports Moulds to Texans" threads...oh, and the "thanks eric" thread yesterday with the one that was started back when there were a half dozen or so "Clayton/ESPN/ESPN Radio Reports Moulds to be cut any second now" threads... As far as the "crap" goes, or at least my contribution to it, I've just had trouble figuring out which of the 100 or so threads on a subject is the one to which I should add my opinion ...so why not put the opinion in all of them?...I did limit it to stuff on the first page and it did work in some respects, because I did get a serious response to one of them... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts