mjt328 Posted May 31, 2011 Share Posted May 31, 2011 When it comes to the NFL work stoppage, I'm just as frustrated as every other NFL fan. I'm tired of seeing greedy billionaire owners and bratty millionaire players fighting over money, while regular people who depend on football for a living (stadium employees, bar owners, etc.) potentially face a tremendous loss of income. I'm tired of Roger Goodell and DeMaurice Smith. I'm tired of hearing about lawsuits and player-organized workouts. I'm ready for the two sides to shut up, get in a room and work out anything that saves the 2011 NFL season. Still, when I don't let me emotions get the best of me, I realize that a "quick fix" isn't the answer. The ramifications of this collective bargaining agreement will have a huge effect on football as a whole - and especially for a small market team like my beloved Buffalo Bills. This thing needs to be done right. Losing all or part of the 2011 season would be bad. But signing another bad CBA could make things much, much worse. And if you don't believe me, just ask Bills owner Ralph Wilson. For all of his shortcomings as a football guy, there is no questioning Wilson's brilliance as a business man, or that he understands how to keep an NFL franchise afloat in a small market. He's already done it for over 50 years. When the previous CBA was agreed upon a few years ago, Wilson and Mike Brown of the Bengals were the only owners to vote against it. They said that revenue sharing plan was going to make competing very difficult for small market teams. At the time, the two owners were laughed at for their reluctance in keeping up with changes to the sport/business. But as time has passed, many of the other small market owners have discovered that Wilson and Brown were spot on. The problem is, under the old CBA, only some revenue was shared amongst NFL teams - such as money from television contracts and jersey sales. Money from stadium box seats and many team-licensed products was not. Because of that, a large market team with a brand-new stadium (like the Dallas Cowboys) can make $400 million each year, while a team like Buffalo brings in closer to $200 million. Players get a percentage of the NFL's total revenue, which determines the league's salary cap. And that salary cap is exactly the same for every team. So when Jerry Jones builds a new stadium in Dallas and his profits go way up, the salary cap goes way up as well - and all the teams have to shell out more money to fill their rosters and stay competitive. Rising player costs aren't a big deal for the teams at the top of the pile who are raking in the dough. But for those at the bottom (like Buffalo), those massive contracts are taking up a bigger percentage of profits every year. If the new CBA doesn't properly address this issue for small market teams, it's probably only a matter of time before the Bills are gone. When Wilson passes and another owner comes into the picture, bigger cities like Toronto and Los Angeles are going to look awfully tempting. Revenue sharing isn't the only issue being debated right now that could negatively affect the future of the Bills in Buffalo. Thanks to the players, the courts are now involved in negotiations. And that could have a lasting effect on the salary cap, free agency and the draft. Look at the trouble we have had winning with everybody on equal footing. Then consider what happens to the Bills if there is no draft and top prospects are able to sign with the highest bidder. What if the salary cap is completely eliminated? Just like everyone else, I'm hoping a deal is worked out before it starts impacting the 2011 season. But as a fan of the NFL and especially the Buffalo Bills, I'm willing to be patient if it means keeping the team in town. http://buffalobillsstampede.blogspot.com/2011/05/bills-fans-should-be-patient-with-labor.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San Jose Bills Fan Posted May 31, 2011 Share Posted May 31, 2011 I guess that makes you Michael Terry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanInUticaTampa Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 Michael J Terry, to be exact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San Jose Bills Fan Posted June 1, 2011 Share Posted June 1, 2011 Well I know you posted this in order to get some comments and some traffic your way so here's a few comments. What you stated about Mike Brown and Ralph Wilson's opposition to the newly opted-out CBA is not entirely accurate… it's a view that is a bit of revisionist history. Wilson complained at the time the other owners ramrodded the CBA through was that "he didn't understand the proposal" and that the owners weren't "given enough time" to evaluate it before voting on it. I could be wrong but I don't recall that Wilson said at that time that it would make it harder for smaller market teams to compete. As far as your discussion on the revenue sharing, while it is true the large market teams have a competitive advantage, don't forget that the Bills lease the stadium for virtually nothing and that the county and taxpayers foot the bill for all maintenance and improvements. So FWIW, Ralph doesn't have a $200 million debt hanging over his head like Jerry Jones does. IMO, there is no financial reason at the present that the Bills can't be competitive like other smaller market teams are because the Bills have much less overhead than some larger market teams who helped finance expensive new stadiums. I agree with you that I hope the new CBA is small market friendly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max997 Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 I could be wrong but I don't recall that Wilson said at that time that it would make it harder for smaller market teams to compete. How can you not recall that he said it would make it harder for smaller market teams to compete? thats all he talked about, over and over and all anyone else talked about because many in the media made it seem like he was cryin poor and ripped him for it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San Jose Bills Fan Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 (edited) The original poster wrote: "Wilson and Mike Brown of the Bengals were the only owners to vote against it. They said that revenue sharing plan was going to make competing very difficult for small market teams." What you stated about Mike Brown and Ralph Wilson's opposition to the newly opted-out CBA is not entirely accurate… it's a view that is a bit of revisionist history. Wilson complained at the time the other owners ramrodded the CBA through was that "he didn't understand the proposal" and that the owners weren't "given enough time" to evaluate it before voting on it. I could be wrong but I don't recall that Wilson said at that time that it would make it harder for smaller market teams to compete. How can you not recall that he said it would make it harder for smaller market teams to compete? thats all he talked about, over and over and all anyone else talked about because many in the media made it seem like he was cryin poor and ripped him for it Here's the quotes that I was referring to: "I didn't understand it. It is a very complicated issue and I didn't believe we should be rushing to vote in 45 minutes. I'm not a dropout ... or maybe I am. I didn't understand it." - Ralph Wilson So I stand by what I said… he didn't understand it and he felt the owners rushed to make a decision. Please find me quotes from the 2007 Owner's Meetings which show him commenting on the new CBA being disadvantageous to smaller market teams. Edited June 2, 2011 by San Jose Bills Fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 They can take all the time they want- 5-6 years is fine with me. People really do have other things they can do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts