Jump to content

Grade the draft. How did they do for value and need?


Grading the Bills draft  

110 members have voted

  1. 1. The Bills deserve a...

    • A+
      5
    • A
      13
    • A-
      15
    • B+
      25
    • B
      20
    • B-
      13
    • C+
      8
    • C
      2
    • C-
      3
    • D+
      2
    • D
      2
    • D-
      1
    • F+
      0
    • F
      0
    • F-, because I want to sound like I know what I'm talking about but obviously don't.
      1


Recommended Posts

Regardless of how they feel about the other recievers, we needed more depth at that position, since there are only like 4 or 5 on the roster right now. Evans, Hardy, Johnson, Parrish....Am I missing anyone?

Spiller. part-time recvr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with the assessment. I think the Bills got great value with Wang in the 5th as well. On top of that, our defensive front next year is going to be sick, on top of an already top-five secondary. We may only win five or six games, but it won't be because the defense sucks. It'll be because we still can't score quite enough points. I do, however, expect that watching the games is going to be a lot more exciting than it has been.

 

The final thing I'll say is that the FO drafted a whole crop of guys who were captains on their teams at the college level. That's a lot of leadership to add to a young team, something that I think will help this team as we move into the future.

 

 

Good post.

 

All were experienced Seniors, healthy, no legal issues and -of coarse- HIGH -MOTOR Guys!

 

I expect a roster spot for all of them is theirs to lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I gave it a B. I think in three years, we'll be disappointed by Troup and Wang, especially in the case of Troup where we passed over some nice prospects at other positions (in particular, Gronkowski). But, besides those two, I liked or loved every other pick in this draft. I especially liked how we spent the third day picking high-upside prospects. Not all of them will pan out, most of them won't, but I think we'll get a good starter or maybe even two good starters out of the group of Easley, Moats, Batten, Calloway, and Brown. If it's Brown that pans out, then obviously the draft becomes an A++.

 

They obviously felt that TE isn't a big need. I agree there are bigger fish to fry right now. Nelson looked good last year and should really step up this year.

 

Spiller. part-time recvr

 

So is Jackson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bills draft analysis

 

April 22, 2010

 

By Russ Lande, Vinnie Iyer and Allen Wilson

 

A look at the Bills' picks in the 2010 NFL draft:

 

1st round, No. 9 overall: C.J. Spiller, RB, Clemson

Russ Lande's take: Spiller is another surprise pick considering Buffalo's current backfield situation and need at tackle, but he is a game-changing explosive athlete. He needs to prove he can withstand the constant pounding he will receive in the NFL, but his speed and athleticism are on par with that of the Titans' Chris Johnson.

 

Vinnie Iyer's take: This pick signals the end of the Marshawn Lynch era. Buffalo had some bigger needs, notably offensive tackle, but instead went with a dynamic playmaker who can spark it in both the running and return games. The Bills needed someone to bring excitement to their offense.

 

Allen Wilson's take:

 

How he fits: Spiller gives the Bills an explosive playmaker with game-breaking speed and the ability to score from anywhere on the field and in a variety of roles. His size and all-purpose ability as a rusher, receiver and return specialist have drawn comparisons to those of Reggie Bush. That also suggests Spiller is not built to carry a heavy-duty load. But he has shown the toughness to run inside like a back of similar stature, Tennessee's Chris Johnson. Spiller needs to work on blitz pickup, but it's doubtful he'll be asked to remain in the backfield on passing downs.

 

When he'll play: Adding Spiller creates a logjam in the backfield. He joins Fred Jackson and Marshawn Lynch, who could be on the trade block. But neither Jackson nor Lynch offers the threat of the home run every time he touches the ball. The Bills didn't take Spiller in the top 10 to be a part-time player. He will see a lot of action immediately on offense and special teams.

 

_____________

 

2nd round, No. 41 overall: Torell Troup, DT, Central Florida

Russ Lande's take: Troup is a large reach at this point but will fill a huge need at nose tackle in Buffalo's new 3-4 defense. He does not move well in space but has the natural strength to occupy multiple blockers at the point of attack.

 

Vinnie Iyer's take: The Bills, switching to a 3-4 defensive front, had a large need for a nose tackle. Troup reminds scouts of Alabama DT Terrence Cody, a big body who doesn't move all that well but eats space. He got picked ahead of Cody because of better "motor."

 

Allen Wilson's take:

 

How he fits: With the Bills going to a 3-4 defense, they needed a space-eater to anchor the line. They found one in Troup, a big, stout run-stuffer. He is very strong at the point of attack and uses his arms to keep blockers off his body. He doesn't push the pocket as a pass rusher, but he can be a factor against the run by occupying multiple offensive linemen, allowing linebackers to get to the ball.

 

When he'll play: Troup adds needed bulk to the line and is expected to share snaps at the nose with Kyle Williams, who will see the bulk of time on passing downs. Troup could be a real asset in short-yardage and goal-line situations, as his big body is hard to move because he uses good lower-body strength to anchor.

 

___________

 

3rd round, No. 72 overall: Alex Carrington, DE, Arkansas State

Russ Lande's take: Carrington was a small-school prospect who helped his stock with a solid senior bowl performance. He has a raw skill set but fits perfectly as a 3-4 DE, as he has outstanding size and good quickness.

 

Vinnie Iyer's take: After grabbing Terrell Troup for nose tackle the round before, Carrington gives the Bills an end to fit with their transition to a 3-4. He is the prototype for the position, but he might be more of an athlete than football player at this point. He has a boom-or-bust feel.

 

Allen Wilson's take:

 

How he fits: He gives the Bills a prototype five-technique end with pass-rush ability for their new 3-4 defense. Carrington had nine sacks as a senior and 10 1/2 as a junior. The Bills expect their outside linebackers to provide much of the pass rush, but Carrington can provide a good push, as well. He has to improve at shedding bigger, stronger blockers, but it's a skill he should be able to develop.

 

When he'll play: Carrington will see immediate time in the line rotation. The Bills believe he should eventually develop into a starter who can handle 40-50 snaps per game.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4th round, No. 107 overall: Marcus Easley, WR, Connecticut

Vinnie Iyer's take: Again, another team takes a good Day 3 risk. Easley has some exciting skills as an athlete, but Buffalo will need to develop him into a complete receiver with plenty of coaching.

 

Allen Wilson's take:

How he fits: Easley has a good combination of size and speed. He has a strong body, which allows him to break tackles and gain yards after the catch, and is a physical blocker. A former walk-on, he didn't do much his first three years before breaking out with a productive senior year. He is not expected to challenge for a starting job, but he'll get a chance to compete for playing time.

 

____________

 

5th round, No. 140 overall: Ed Wang, OT, Virginia Tech

Vinnie Iyer's take: Wang has a strong build but he needs to hone his technique with his hands, legs to become the physical force he should be. That will require him to show more competitive fire. He projects as a versatile guard/tackle backup.

 

Allen Wilson's take:

How he fits: Wang is a mature player with good size and plays with sound technique. A former high school tight end, he has the athletic ability to play in space. Though he isn't expected to start immediately, it's not out of the question. A lot depends on the health of LT Demetrius Bell, who is coming off surgery to repair a torn ACL.

 

____________

 

6th round, No. 178 overall: Arthur Moats, OLB, James Madison

 

Vinnie Iyer's take: The Bills continue to find pieces for their new 3-4 defense. They're hoping Moats, a fine pass rusher, can make two successful transitions, both from a small school to the NFL and from end to outside linebacker.

 

Allen Wilson's take:

How he fits: He played end in college but projects as a 3-4 outside linebacker in the NFL. He was a good Division I-AA pass rusher whose low center of gravity helps him play with good leverage. Moats has the kind of agility to be an immediate contributor on special teams and eventually help on defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6th round, No. 192 overall: Dan Batten, OLB, South Dakota State

Vinnie Iyer's take: Buffalo was attracted to Batten's hustle and ability to play rush linebacker, something the team needs in a transition to a 3-4 scheme.

 

Allen Wilson's take:

 

How he fits: He was a disruptive pass rusher at the Division I-AA level who projects to outside linebacker because of his ability to drop in coverage and play in space. He looks like a career backup who will have a chance to win a roster spot based on his special teams play.

 

7th round, No. 209 overall: Levi Brown, QB, Troy

 

Allen Wilson's take:

How he fits: He's an intriguing prospect who was rated much higher in some pre-draft ratings than where he was drafted. He brings a strong arm but has to adjust to playing under center after being in a shotgun offense. He clearly has the physical tools to play in the NFL, but it might take a year or two of development before he is ready to play in a regular-season game.

 

7th round, No. 216 overall: Kyle Calloway, T, Iowa

Allen Wilson's take:

How he fits: An experienced college tackle who projects as a guard, Calloway has excellent size and good athleticism. He has trouble with speed rushers but is effective once he engages. He is seen primarily as a backup, especially after the Bills drafted starters Eric Wood and Andy Levitre last year.

 

The take

 

"(Troup) is a classic nose. He plays a lot of snaps, he plays a lot of snaps every game, he's strong, he can beat the double-team, and you know what those guys do. Those are the guys who have to defeat double-teams or at least hold up so your linebackers have a chance. He plays like he wants to be good, and he's got good strength.'' -- Chief scout Tom Modrak

 

"If you look at Levi, he has a very good arm, he throws a tight spiral. He has excellent size and enough mobility to escape the rush, and he's a very intelligent guy. He's going to need some work, but we think he's a good-looking prospect." -- Coach Chan Gailey on QB Levi Brown

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I give them a F- because I liked the explination next to the F-. I'm an idiot. If I knew anything about football talent I wouldn't be sitting here grading the draft. The Bills did good. Spiller was a surprise for me but I see the value and he probably was the best player available. If I had a team and had no needs, I would pick Spiller #1.

 

Your post made me laugh. I thought we did ok; would have liked a monster O.T. but the top ones were already gone at #9. Plus, if Spiller is all that they say, we will be thinking we got Thurman jr in a couple of years. Go Bills!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...