Jump to content

Niagara Bill

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,702
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Niagara Bill

  1. 1 hour ago, Wolfgang said:

     

     

     

    You should go see a doctor...

     

    Good luck...

     

     

     

    Amazing how non of the Naga folks will take a position in the childish, racist AI generated images your leader posts. You all love !irk, for good reasons, but even he would find this insulting...take a position Wolfgang.. you know you have your own Biden on your hands. 

    You had lots to say on that...stand on your hind legs and tell the world clearly. JD won't. Or are you just like all the frat boys at the Ryder cup. 

    • Haha (+1) 2
  2. 10 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

    Would you mind asking your question again? It may have gotten lost in your emotional ranting. 
     

    Edit - Maybe ask it tomorrow. It’s obvious you are drunk. 

    Would Kirk support trumps actions regarding his AI post after his meetjng with minority congressional reps? Simple question.

    Additional question, do you.?

    • Haha (+1) 1
  3. 21 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

    If the meme had Jeffries wearing lederhosen would it be racist?

     

     

    Answer my question. Are you that gutless.

    Yes it would be racist, childish  insulting, 

    How childish can a nan be, holding discussions to dea, either actions that can affect millions of US citizens and follow up is a 4th grade taunting. 

    You are just afraid to judge your hero. You are pathetic, 

    And by the way, do was Biden.Harris and the rest of those woke nuts.

    • Haha (+1) 1
  4. 52 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

    Nothing about his behavior is correct. Almost everyone knows that. Your words were:

     


    I simply asked what you found racist. So far you’ve been unable to articulate your thoughts in that regard and have moved on to “Trump bad”.

     

    Have you seen Jeffries and Schumer in action? They are far from “respected”. That’s the result of their own words and actions. 
     

    You shouldn’t throw “racist” around so casually. 

    He is a racist using cultural norms in taunting is racist, like black face.

    Taunting is childish and comes from the inability to express yourself intelligently.

    Either that, his minions are 7 year olds.

     

    Now answer my question if uiu are capable 

    • Haha (+1) 1
  5. 30 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

    It wasn’t that hard of a question. What did you find racist about the sombrero meme?

    What did you think was correct about your leader mocking respected politicians, an American citizen, at the  expense of American in crisis of government shutdown...a 79 year old acting like a 6 year old...

    • Haha (+1) 1
  6. 10 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

    You must be referring to the sombrero. What do you find racist about it?

     Wow...how much into denial you must be. 

    We're you one of the real Americans at the Ryder cup. Frat boys.with no decency left. 

    I have no tolerance for liberals dei crap, but

    Are maga really just pigs...

     

    • Haha (+1) 1
  7. On 10/1/2025 at 11:07 AM, Royale with Cheese said:

     

    There should be zero negotiation to give criminals who are illegal free benefits.  I mean come on.

    Schumer, Obama, Clinton etc....have all said that giving benefits to illegals is wrong.  But now Schumer has flipped lol.

    Illegals are not getting benefits.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1
    • Haha (+1) 2
  8. If you are a democrat, a republican, an independent,  legal or illegal, woke or maga, Christian or non Christian, and you saw trumps insults created by AI on his social towards the minority leadership, then heard the silence from congress, then listened to trumps speech to 800 military leaders...and you are not very concerned about you country's future, you must be numb or full of hate. 

     

  9. 13 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

    This thread already exists

    The threads are ALL the same. Your paid reteric vs other paid reteric.

    Yada Yada...

    Those who love their bs and hate their country vs those who love their bs and hate their country.

    Those who are destroying the once great nation of the United States of America vs Those who are destroying the once great nation of the United States of America.

     

    So sad!

     

    • Agree 1
  10. 2 hours ago, Hank II said:

    We provide you safety and security with our military, affording you the luxury of your higher than should be tax dollars to fund your free health care system instead of national defense. Case in point, when Trump demanded NATO countries pay 5%, you had politicians say "we can't afford to pay 5% and fund our public Healthcare, and we choose Healthcare".  I don't begrudge you that, it's noble. But it's the security we provide you that allows you to do that, so no, in my view we don't get close to what we should from Canada for what we provide. 

     

    As an aside, it's difficult for me to respect a country that has a monarch of another country on their federal currency. 

    Wrong, never suddenly healthcare stopped military spending. You know nothing about our system. Each province is different. I do know that much of your population cannot afford to get sick, that your healthcard providers are the richest in the world  that your drug prices are the most expensive in the world. 

    You may not respect monarchs, but Canada,  Australia, New Zealand, Scotland Wales etc are proud to have the monarchy symbol. King Charles is not king of another country, so little you know. 

    Btw, you can stop providing military help anytime you want. It is your choice. Nobody forced you, nobody begged you. 

    • Haha (+1) 1
  11. 3 hours ago, Neo said:

    There is not a more efficient, more concise, more clear demonstration of understanding neither Donald Trump or Nazism than to link the two.

     

    Trump isn’t a fascist, and saying so weakens whatever other argument you may have against him.   Further, I hope we all see how dangerous the uninformed or disingenuous argument can be.

     

    Few political labels carry as much rhetorical firepower as “fascist.”  It is an indictment loaded with history’s heaviest baggage, invoking images of Mussolini’s jackboots, Hitler’s concentration camps, and the annihilation of democratic societies.  When that term is applied casually, even frequently, to President Trump, it demands a pause for critical thinking.  One can support Trump or not, but if we value honest argument, we can’t keep calling him something he demonstrably is not.

     

    Trump’s presidencies are disruptive.  He challenges norms, attacks the press, casts doubt on electoral outcomes, and uses populist rhetoric to consolidate support. These actions stir legitimate alarm, particularly among academics, journalists, and progressives.  But here’s the rub: not everything that alarms us is fascism, and calling it so weakens both the critique and the credibility of those making it.

     

    Fascism Is a specific ideology, not a synonym for strong man politics.

     

    Historically, fascism is not merely authoritarian or nationalist.  It is a tightly defined political ideology marked by:  1) state control, including the dissolution of democratic institutions, and; 2) single-party regime that eliminates all opposition, and; 3) militarized expansionism, glorifying violence as a national cleansing force, and; 4) cult of personality, in which the leader is the mystical embodiment of the national will, and; 5) and; suppression of individual rights, free speech, and press not just in practice, but in principle.

     

    I will entertain a conversation around cult of personality and antipathy toward the press.   Neither, however, is unique to Trump.

     

    Whatever you think of Trump, the United States under his leadership retains multiple centers of democratic power.  The courts rule against him.  The press stays free and relentless.  Political opposition thrives, and elections continue (including one in which he lost and was removed from office).  If this is fascism, it is fascism with term limits, Supreme Court rulings, free elections and Saturday Night Live sketches. In other words, it isn’t fascism.

     

    It’s tempting to focus on Trump’s authoritarian style and his disregard for norms.  He has shown a preference for loyalty over expertise and uses brash rhetoric toward political enemies. But authoritarian tendencies exist across the political spectrum.  So does ultra-nationalism.  History is replete with left-wing strongmen who centralized power, suppressed opposition, and wrapped their movements in national glory.  Stalin, Mao, and Castro were not fascists.  They were authoritarians of the left.  Their methods overlapped, but their ideologies were different.

     

    Fascism is not merely “authoritarianism we don’t like.”  To confuse the two is to dilute both terms until they mean nothing.  If Trump is a fascist, so too were Woodrow Wilson, FDR (who interned citizens), and Andrew Jackson (who defied the courts).

     

    Words like “fascist” should not be used as cudgels in political debate.  They are powerful, yes, but that power comes when their precision is used correctly, not when their volume is used incorrectly.  When scholars and journalists abandon the precision of language in favor of emotional resonance, they cease to inform and begin to incite.

     

    If everything is fascism, then nothing is.  Worse, when the real thing arises, and history warns that it always can, we will have spent our credibility crying wolf.  We will have alienated those who might otherwise have joined a thoughtful, principled resistance.

     

    Opposing Trump, as many Americans reasonably do, does not require historical distortion.  There is ample ground to challenge his policies, criticize his conduct, and question his fitness for office.  But calling him a fascist is not analysis. It’s theater.  That’s my problem with the left.   Absent confronting ideas, it tosses out thoughtless labels.

     

    If we are going to defend liberal democracy we must be better than that.  We must name threats accurately, not emotionally.  That means rejecting the lazy comfort of exaggerated labels, and instead embracing the harder works of truth and honesty.

     

    I leave this for readers to consider.

    You no longer have the ability to defend liberal democracy. The opposing party (Dems) are not capable. They refuse to drop issues that caused this revolution. Right about now...is too late. When the president can use the military at will against its own citizens, a military that is the strongest in the world, the discourse is over. 

    Strange, when China uses the military to quell dissidents the US population becomes unhinged. 

  12. 2 hours ago, Hank II said:

    I don't think of Canada as a friend. I think of Canada as a little brother whom we protect, and we give to was more than receive. 

    You think wrong. You give nothing to us. We have supported you  traded equally with you....on a per capital basis we purchase 8 times more from youth and you buy from us. We sell you oil which you president says is better than green energy, at a 15% discount world markets. We have saved your diplomats, fought side by side, cooperated and collaborated on world safety  issues and was a trusted friend, sharing critical info and military systems.

    Either way you cut it, friend or little brother, your president and your country is sh##Ing on us and the world. But shortly  that won't matter to you...you will not be able to debate your own situation unless the government gives you permission. Imagine a second rate comedian being the focus of your government. Imagine your president hating a second rate comedian more than the commie  leader of Russia. 

    Imagine, the public focused on this issue, focused on Epstein, focused on a budget, as the government institutions of justice, Military, elections are moving to take control.

     

    • Haha (+1) 1
  13. 2 hours ago, Hank II said:

    You scared?

    Not scared of you if that is what you mean. Concerned for children, concerned for rule of law, concerned for their freedom. I know many people who once lived under dictators. Free enterprise will disappear.

    Don't enjoy thinking of war between friends...but it has happened before around the world.

    1 hour ago, IrishLass said:

     

    Need MOAR Trump!

     

     

    Don't need more trump, you need border patrols to do their job, you need to enforce the laws. 

    But after 2 posts we are suppose to accept your fake news...just like the exploding microphone..

     

  14. 1939, people in Germany didn't believe concentration camps existed or were infact death camps. So much hatred existed inside the country and against other countries who were said to have punished Germany and had taken advantage of the German people. Enemies within and outside existed.

    Troups in the street. People disappearing, financially things looked better, cultural purity was promised, speeches were given against the rest of Europe, deals were made with Russia. Persecution of political enemies, assassinations enraged the population. Older military leaders were banished. The leader was constantly praised by his supporters. 

    Soon elections disappeared, a neighboring country was vilified and invaded. 

    Hmmm

     

    • Agree 1
    • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...