Trevor

Sounds like an ironclad case against both the Patriots and Rodney Harrison to me. Staley didn't see it, and neither did anybody here - more than enough proof for me.

Eventually the Pats will lose, because all teams eventually lose, but every game the Pats have played in the last 17 (when they weren't playing Indy or Tenn) have been described as trap games.

Definitely a chance. Sweltering heat; Arizona pretty good at home (4-4 last year I think); new coach; played much better against Rams last week. Classic let-down game.

It was the word fail I was objecting to. A FG in a situation where a FG wins the game, can never be a failure.

This is where your premise falls flat on it's face. Brady didn't fail "to move the offense over the goal line", he got them in FG range in situations where a FG wins the game. In 2001 he drove them for 3 first downs with only 90 seconds left. In 2003 he drove them for 3 first downs in only 64 seconds.

And Vinatieri IS the kicker in NE, and they DO have two superbowl wins. Any attempts to lessen the role of a single player in those wins is nothing but sour grapes. You're okay with the other 52 players having rings, but Brady shouldn't have his? Your priorities: 1) anti-Brady fan 2) anti-Pats fan 3) Bills fan Funny how that is a common theme among Bledsoe's diehards.