meazza

Some are.

Staying inside is one method but were these people washing their hands and being cautious when coming into contact with relatives who haven't been home?

Welcome to the forum Mr Berlusconi.

A friend of mine is a native from Senegal and he told me that the infection rate is rather low there. Generally, the population takes it weekly so he attributes it to that. It could be or it could also be that it's hot and humid as ***** in Senegal.

Perhaps it works but the heart issues make it ineffective for the people most likely having complications with the virus?

Think for yourself bro. Clearly someone is thinking for themselves if they parrot, word for word, another source for which they trust such as Reality Check.

Task force winding down in a couple of weeks.

Good luck on your trolling mission.

Don't mistake my response with anger. I am very zen but I have very little tolerance for your kind of stupidity.

I decided to read this response. Way to miss the point. I'd like to talk about the virus, not about trump or whoever's response. So ***** you and your worthless opinion.

I risk literally having full pages of ignored users.

If you update your ignore list and add about 15 people, you could potentially have a pleasant experience here.

You're alt-right.

The latter.

https://www.mediaite.com/trump/ny-times-reports-trump-admin-privately-projecting-3000-daily-deaths-by-june-white-house-disputes/ Is Nate Silver now a right winger?

I propose 'message board distancing'. Every level headed poster puts the trolls on ignore and does not reply to any of them. By the end of the summer, we should have more data on what therapies work and which people are more at risk than we have now. We have Italy to thank for providing so much data that allowed us to prepare somewhat.

You're half right. Models depend strongly on inputs and the inputs are obviously continuously changing based on the evolving studies and rapidly changing facts on the ground. That doesn't mean you ignore the models but that also doesn't mean you take them at face value. One of the most important inputs, R, based on the serology tests tells me that this variable is way off and it should be way higher with the mortality being way lower.

TPS is an economist so that automatically qualifies him as a right winger.

Doc Brown.

Word to the wise. Always sleep in.

See my post from last night. This is approximately 0.4% but that is still high given the rate of transmission.

I agree. We have pretty strong measures in place here as well but it’s still spreading. The head of the Quebec health sector says there should be close to 250,000 people while we only have 30,000 confirmed cases testing around 7,000 day. Im curious as well as to how this has been spreading.

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/04/11/why-a-study-showing-that-covid-19-is-everywhere-is-good-news @Magox I'm pretty sure this is what you've been saying for a while. Nice to see that this is being proven more and more.

?

I wonder if he realizes Lincoln was assassinated?