[DOJ Appoints Robert Mueller as Special Counsel - Jerome Corsi Rejects Plea Deal]

 

[Well? Have You Checked Her Out? Stormy Daniels!]

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Motive: The "whistleblower" knows the Treasury IG is about to out him and charge him, this is an attempt to get in front of the story and mitigate the damage. He's trying to justify a criminal act with "my conscious compelled me". 

 

He's so worried about preservation of records... that he turned them over to Avenatti.  gimme a break. 

 

Interesting theory. We'll find out very soon.

[Well? Have You Checked Her Out? Stormy Daniels!]

 

Wow - this whistleblower is going to do 5 years in prison for this. What a story.

[Well? Have You Checked Her Out? Stormy Daniels!]

2 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

So, the purpose is to undermine the Trump Presidency.  Do you believe this is valid or wise?

 

Valid? Maybe, depending on future evidence. Valid now? No.

 

Wise? No way.

[DOJ Appoints Robert Mueller as Special Counsel - Jerome Corsi Rejects Plea Deal]

Last week Giuliani was going on about how Mueller only has one interview left - Donald Trump. Rudy could not have been more wrong.

 

 

[Well? Have You Checked Her Out? Stormy Daniels!]

1 minute ago, LABillzFan said:

 

You would think after Hillary got her ass beat by Trump, the left would do some self-evaluation. "What did we do wrong? What can we improve? Where can we get better?"

 

But that's not really possible with their party leaders, because everyone knows that the left is never to blame for their failures. It always comes down to something like "We just didn't get our message out properly" or "The Russians ate my homework" or "We did everything right, but the white women in this country don't know how to stand up to the men in their lives."

 

So here's free advice: keeping this Stormy Daniels story front-and-center is probably the single biggest thing the left can do to ensure Trump get's re-elected.

 

So you keep pushing the story wherever you go.

 

I've noticed there are a lot of questions and comments from you in this thread for a topic you claim only myself and Anna Massoglia care about.

Here's some free advice: Shut the hell up if you don't have anything constructive to bring to the table.

[Well? Have You Checked Her Out? Stormy Daniels!]

35 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

Just for shitzngiggles...what do you think the end game is with this story?

 

What do you think the left wants to see happen as a full win when this is done?

 

I think the end game with this story will be minutiae in the final context of Trump's presidency. He'll either go down in the Mueller investigation, or ride it out with his base claiming none of this is a big deal.

 

I think the left wants to see him impeached and will want to use the OGE statement on this as a piece of evidence if there is ever  impeachment.

[Well? Have You Checked Her Out? Stormy Daniels!]

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

As was rightly stated at the time of Rudy's interview, it was a legal strategy. Take a political hit now (which is what you're seeing) for legal protection later. That protection being it removes any campaign finance violations from the table... which is all they have regarding Stromy/Trump. Everything else being discussed is character/political hit points rather than real legal jeopardy. 

 

Dems think people care Trump slept around. 

 

They're wrong. 

 

For Trump's sake hopefully that legal strategy pays off.

 

 

[Well? Have You Checked Her Out? Stormy Daniels!]

6 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

"Detailed on page 45 of his financial disclosure" is, of course, the exact opposite of "lied about it." 

 

In a vacuum, of course. In reality, the details should have been in the report for 2016 signed on June 14th 2017. Here's Trump in his own words.

 

 

[Well? Have You Checked Her Out? Stormy Daniels!]

7 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

So there is you and Anna Massoglia.

 

That makes two people who still care about this.

 

Gator probably makes three.

 

HUGE! REALLY HUGE!

 

 

[Well? Have You Checked Her Out? Stormy Daniels!]

 

I wouldn't call it huge, but it's certainly newsworthy, as Donald first denied any payment at all to Cohen. Here we have Donald in a new financial disclosure form admitting to reimbursement to Cohen of $100,001 - $250,000. 

[Are we ramping up to war with North Korea?]

Just now, joesixpack said:

 

Well, that's a shame since I'd like to see your defense of the three media outlets of the deep state.

 

 

You forgot CNN

[Are we ramping up to war with North Korea?]

5 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

We are going in circles and you present a full stop because you won't concede that the coverage of this is highly bias and generally misleading with a heavy emphasis on political spin to be against the Trump

 

For the record, I'm specifically talking about the 3 articles released this morning on the topic from NYT, WAPO, & USA Today. The article at the top of news.google is the USA Today article. These three articles covered the statements made by Kim Kye Gwan and were not misleading against Trump.

 

Certainly other coverage (even within the 3 papers mentioned) will be biased. It will be found under Editorial. 

 

I do not present a full stop. I welcome you or someone else to quote from those 3 articles any biases or misleading statements. Until you or someone else does so, I'm done in this thread.

[Are we ramping up to war with North Korea?]

3 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

Negative. 

 

Official news is an actual statement saying that due to war games blablabla

Your tweet source doesn't have solid information. 

 

 

We're going in circles now, so I won't muck up this thread anymore. Thank you for the thoughtful conversation.

[DOJ Appoints Robert Mueller as Special Counsel - Jerome Corsi Rejects Plea Deal]

 

That is a lot of pages of transcripts. There is going to be tons of news about this today.

[Are we ramping up to war with North Korea?]

3 minutes ago, row_33 said:

Negotiations are always difficult with the region, any progress is great news, any setback is fully expected

 

 

 

Indeed.

5 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

 

 

It's fake news because there has not been official output from State.  

 

 

Let me get this straight - the only news that isn't fake is official output from State?

[Are we ramping up to war with North Korea?]

6 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

1) burden of proof is on you since you're disagreeing. Learn how to argue real austistic.

 

2) well, by that standard, you're correct. It's not official. That's called #fakenews. Something WaPo created when talking about Trump. It is sensationalizing an unfound even and gossip no different than tabloid trash.  Of course, as an austistic, you canmot disseminate trash from reality.  Don't forget, Wapner 4, you retard.

 

1) The proof is in reading the 4 articles mentioned. None of them have sensationalized. If they have, I'd welcome someone to point out exactly where.

 

2) It's not fake news. It's real - straight from the mouth of the Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs of DPRK. 

[Are we ramping up to war with North Korea?]

5 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

No.

 

This is not true.

 

.

 

Please post proof. 

 

4 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

Uh, it's not news until it's official you moron.  They most clearly are.

 

And that they're gloating is disgusting.  You really should learn to not post stupidity. You'd do better.  Try harder or give up.

 

The news is North Korea threatened to cancel the summit. Their state run media literally said that. It's news. Below is a translation of a statement they released yesterday. In your opinion, should nobody in the world cover this statement because nothing is official?

 

[Are we ramping up to war with North Korea?]

59 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

Every lead story on every source news.google, WaPo, USA today, NY times, etc is gloating the threats to cancel.

 

Way to go media

 

 

This is not true. They're reporting news. There is no gloating in any of those articles.

 

I'm sure, however, there will be gloating in editorials.

[CNN losing credibility as each day passes... Its pure propaganda at this point]

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Two birds. 

 

Its a repeating pattern. A call for "action" echoed by various others in the entertainment industry as well. 

 

Conditioning. Mockingbird. MKU. Take your pick. 

 

Meh - agree to disagree. 

 

I'd prefer stronger evidence.

 

Thank you, though, for having an honest conversation without interjecting with vulgarities and FAKE NEWS!!!!!!

[CNN losing credibility as each day passes... Its pure propaganda at this point]

3 minutes ago, OJABBA said:

 

The old "write your Congressman" bit. !@#$ off. 

 

?

[CNN losing credibility as each day passes... Its pure propaganda at this point]

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

They bracketed a speech he gave with "Killing Kennedy" specials - before and after, with adds running while he was speaking. 

 

A Trump speech would vastly increase the ratings for CNN. Is it possible that those who ran this special knew that and wanted to advertise it to the largest possible audience?

[CNN losing credibility as each day passes... Its pure propaganda at this point]

Just now, Boyst62 said:

Would it matter to you?  It wouldn't. You've already deflected and shown intellectual dishonesty.

 

Fool.

 

Please shut up. I'm trying to have an honest discussion.

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

Yup. 

 

Remember the 60's series run by CNN a few months ago? Look back into how they covered Kennedy's assassination in relation to Trump.

 

Missed it completely. If you can show there's a real pattern, you should document it and send it to law enforcement.

[CNN losing credibility as each day passes... Its pure propaganda at this point]

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

...Yup. Sure it is... 

 

A pattern would happen more than twice. Do you have more still frames to support your argument?

[CNN losing credibility as each day passes... Its pure propaganda at this point]

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

I'd be willing to buy that excuse if it wasn't a reoccurring pattern: 

 

That is a highlight used to light up a figure standing in the window. Complaining about this is almost as ridiculous as folks losing their minds over Sarah Palin's map a few years ago.