42Knuck
-
Posts
56 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by 42Knuck
-
-
15 minutes ago, Bangarang said:
I will always hate these arguments.
Very circular, always end up back were we began.
-
1 minute ago, Alphadawg7 said:
Peyton Manning’s first 15 games: 24 INTs.
Wow, impressive, they should have gone with Ryan Leaf.
-
3
-
-
I sure hope none of you folks play the stock market! You would be buying and selling at the drop of a hat. But, fortunately it doesn't really matter what any of us think, the coaches will continue to coach him, and give him at least through next season to grow. Assuming he continues to have good games mixed in with the bad, like so far this year!
Sunday was a really bad day for him, against a really good team, so be it. It's not the end of the world, and certainly not the end of his career. I do think he was overwhelmed by the enormity of the day though. This was a big, big game, against a really good team. The build up was enormous, and I have feeling he let it get to him, and he froze. It's happened to all of us, it certainly has happened to me early in my career. The only way to get better at handling that is to live through it. The next time won't seem so big, and he'll handle it much better.
We shall see!
-
Couldn’t agree more. Have believed that since the Ain’ts won the Super Bowl the year Katrina destroyed NO.
The worse franchise in the history of the league, not even close, and the win it all.
Nice story though.
-
That was total BS. That no call was terrible. O other way to put it.
-
I also don’t see a lot of out routes to the sideline this season. At least not until Allen does become the starter.
-
I think Nate is the right choice for now, but if he’s still starting this time next year we’re in trouble.
-
3 hours ago, BillsRdue said:
I hate social media. Twitter, Facebook, Instagram all a waste of time.
And... What do you think this is?
-
2
-
-
I'll be watching the WR competition as well, but I expect a big jump this year in production no matter who makes the team just because of the change at QB, I think the WR's will have a better chance of making plays. It was a tough couple years for those guys, TT was a great guy, but not very effective at hooking up with WR's.
I'm more interested in both lines. They brought a lot guys in, I think there's going to be some fierce competition in the trenches.
-
I think Cleveland has a good chance of holding onto the top spot. I know they just got their QB, but the team is still young, they will take time to come around, and their coach stinks. Seriously, 1-31 over the last two season? Who keeps a job in the NFL with that record?
-
14 hours ago, TheTruthHurts said:
Watched all his games. He's not impressive at all.
Then it's settled. Cut him.
-
51 minutes ago, Domdab99 said:
well that was a waste of a pick. I'm 5'10" and taller than this guy. Almost faster, too.
This guy was projected as an UFA.
Not good.
Pretty sure you're a better athlete. They should sign you. It can be like the Eagles in Invinceable!
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, dollars 2 donuts said:
Maybe I am just fatigued with this painstaking lead up to the draft. Maybe I am just annoyed that the jets WILL get one of the top 2 or 3 qbs in the draft.
However, I have gone from being fine with not over paying to get to 3 to...well...i'd feel better if we got to three, even knowing we may have to, or could have, rolled with the Giants for 2.
We'll soon see. I have enjoyed aspects of this year's draft, but I need the first round to be over and Thursday can't come soon enough.
Go Bills.
if regrets over not getting to 3 already well covered, Mods please feel free to lock.
Nope, I'm good with staying put and loading up on talent. This is a process, as McBean like to say. Look at some of the teams that have won it all, they didn't have high first round franchise QB's. Last year is a prefect example. You have to build a complete team, and have a good quarterback that can hit guys when they're open. Build a great defense, along with a great running game, then all you need a guy like AJ McCarren to manage the game. I think trading away the farm for an unknown player is a really bad idea.
-
Just now, buffaloboyinATL said:
As I said before, it depends who’s there. You don’t trade up for the spot, you trade up for the player.
Unless you trade high enough. That said though, I'm still not convinced McBean will pass up the opportunity to get several talented player for one? That doesn't mean the won't move up though. Bean appears to be a pretty sharp due, he may be able to get up there in ways we can't see from where we stand? It is rather exciting. Next week is going to be glacial leading up to the start of the draft.
-
I still think a deal was struck with Cleveland for #4 at the time of TT trade. I just felt the value they gave us for him was too high considering the team was likely to let him go anyway. It makes more sense that it was tied to a bigger deal to move up. I guess we'll see in a week!
-
30 minutes ago, fridge said:
I don’t like the draft coverage. In recent years I’ve barely watched and just waited to see the pick video online. I think it’s combination of the annoying spoiling, the ill-timed commercials, and the hype machine that just makes me want to look away. When they spread it to three days that sealed the deal for me. The draft was once a great event, but now it’s completely up its own ass.
Yeah, I just check my phone now to get updates. I can waste that much time watching it.
-
Not sure guys. I'm not convinced this regime is willing to trade the farm for an unknown quantity? They may stand pat, take the best player on the board, and go forward with McCarron? They can fill some serious gaps wit the picks they have.
-
He may be your boy, but I'm pretty sure he isn't the Bill's boy. He is not a team guy, he gets in trouble, he does stupid things on the field. I don't see it happening.
-
No problem. The only way the I see the Colts trading out of #3 is if they stay with Luck. Otherwise they will stay put and take a QB, no? If they do stay with Luck then the trade is just about giving them enough trade value for a #3. Not sure McBean will be interested spending that much capital?
-
Who's at 3? Colts?
-
1
-
-
20 minutes ago, Augie said:
Rolling the trade that already happened with the trade that could maybe, possibly happened was a very effective way to.....muddy the entire picture.
I know right!?! That's what makes it so interesting, and fun. But, why not. I know the the straight up trade value of picks for picks does not seem like enough for #4, but the Taylor addition might be enough to tip the scale?
-
2 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:
Why would they make half of a trade official?
I dunno, maybe so they could move TT over now so he can start getting acclimated, and the Bills don't want others to know what their planning yet? Strategery.
Just now, kdiggz said:That's not the best way to gain credibility as a new poster on a forum
Darn, didn't know that was important.
5 minutes ago, McBean said:I hope you’re right.
It would mean we are taking Mayfield.
Cleveland takes Darnold and Giants taking Rosen.
Right. Good scenario.
-
1 minute ago, nucci said:
Nothing in your post seems like an opinion. Sorry if I interpreted it incorrectly
No worries. I did purposely write it to sound like someone who knows something, very convincing, no? Why not, seems to be the way to write on this board!
-
7 minutes ago, nucci said:
Then why wasn't it announced?
It's an opinion dude. Roll with it! This is a fun off season, time for speculation, and good feelings.
-
1
-
Does anyone listen live to the Lo-Down Radio Show with Lorenzo Alexander?
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Caught it once, it was awesome. He is really good, well spoken, and a great interview. Looking forward to tomorrow's segment.