YesPlayoffs
-
Posts
77 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by YesPlayoffs
-
-
Just now, MAJBobby said:
Answer the questions
cant call anything a lie without proof. Sorry
You're a complete joke.
And I guess a giant racist, too. Prove that you're not.
-
1
-
-
Just now, MAJBobby said:
Google is your friend. Go read. Nah never mind you wont because you dont care about reality.
Answer my three questions
Google says nothing that correlates to your claims. It's a straight up lie.
-
1 minute ago, BuffaloBill said:
He never had an offer from them. He was under contract in Buffalo.
This was referring to the initial signing. He had offers from Denver and Buffalo...he chose Buffalo because Manning was still playing.
Just now, MAJBobby said:Do you have any proof its not.
I notice you didnt answer the questions
LOL I don't need proof that it's not.
That would be like me saying you don't like Tyrod simply because you're a giant racist, then making you prove that you're not or else I'm correct.
-
1 minute ago, MAJBobby said:
No it is not
was the option picked up?
was the Combine before re-signing?
did he redo his contract to stay as a starter in Buffalo?
Do you have any proof? Any link? Anything that makes this something other than a message board lie? Didn't think so.
You can choose to believe whatever nonsense you want, but don't say something is a fact when it didn't happen.
-
2 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:
WRONG it is true
Bills declined his option. Taylors Agent checked the market for him at the Combine. NADA Taylor reset his contract in Buffalo
All Facts
so Again how does TT (who they passed on last year) HELP upgrade their QB room
Completely false. It's just a message board fabrication.
-
5 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:
Again they had their chance to take him. And Passed.
They didn't pass on him...he chose Buffalo over their offer.
Just now, Buffalo716 said:TT had his chance to test the market...it wasn't that favorable for him and he re signed here
That's not true at all.
-
11 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:
Fun fact, no one is an expert at evaluating Qbs.
Especially this message board
-
Since he arrived, we are 2-7 in games where Tyrod started and threw for over 250. 0-1 in games he threw for over 300.
At the same time, we are 17-9 in games where he doesn't throw an interception.
Make of that what you will.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, TheTruthHurts said:
The key with having a QB like Alex Smith is you always should be developing a talented QB behind him.
...and an offense around him, as well.
-
On 11/25/2017 at 12:21 AM, Hapless Bills Fan said:
I would also posit close to or better than 60% completions, near 7 AY/A and a TD/INT ratio of >1.5 as criteria for assessing success of a modern QB.
By that measurement, TT has been a success in Buffalo. 63% completion pct, 7.2 YPA and a 3.3 TD/INT ratio for his time as a Bill.
-
I think Tyrod is a good stopgap until we can develop the QB of the future. More often than not, he puts us in a position to win games. What we should do is take one of the half-dozen top QB prospects with our first rounder next season and focus on improving the OL with many of our other picks in order to have proper protection for the young guy when he becomes the starter.
So Tyrod starts in 2018 and when the rookie is ready, he should take over. If that happens during next season, good. If it takes more than a season for the rookie to be ready, we should offer TT a one year extension for 2019. If he takes it, then we just rinse and repeat until the rookie is ready, if the rookie is never ready, we try again later. If TT doesn't want to come back, the rookie gets a trial by fire and we'll see what we have then.
Tyrod starting games and the Bills planning for the future aren't mutually exclusive options.
-
1 minute ago, ganesh said:
He does have a point. The difference between winning and losing in the NFL is a play here or there that you make or don't make.
Yep. The TD pass to Zay was the difference.
-
1
-
-
Just now, DaBillsFanSince1973 said:
had they lost, yes that one play would of been the nail in the coffin.
Not really.
-
Just now, BigDingus said:
**PROOF**
Again, it's the DEFENSE that is responsible for our wins this season. They win IN SPITE of Tyrod. The offense tried their best to lose this game, the coaches don't trust Tyrod worth a crap, and the DEFENSE came through (as they did in our 5 previous wins).
Also, with a competent QB this team will be deadly. Our O-line played like champs today. Tyrod had all day to throw.LOL Troll harder.
-
Just now, DaBills51 said:
Question - does every QB hit open receivers perfectly in stride on every throw?
Of course they do.
At least according to the brilliant brain trust that posts here.
-
7 minutes ago, joesixpack said:
Taylor is on pace for his usual 215ish game. 1td no int. It’s just not good enough.
You know who else has stats like that? Dak Prescott. Cowboys fans think he's not good enough either, I guess.
-
1 hour ago, BillsEnthusiast said:
and you can't improve unless you try....see where I'm going with this? Would a picture help?
I guess you don't realize it, but the NFL is for people who try and succeed. That's why the salaries for head coaches are millions. Trying and failing shouldn't be encouraged...that's the reason for firing people.
If you're fine with failure, then that's a "you" problem.
30 minutes ago, joesixpack said:I can guarantee you ZERO national analysts waste time watching the bills.
I can guarantee that you don't know **** about what national analysts do.
-
Just now, BillsEnthusiast said:
neither does standing pat and doing nothing.
Of course not. "Improve" is what works in the NFL...if McDip**** want to "try" and fail, he can go coach a college team.
-
18 minutes ago, BillsEnthusiast said:
That scheme is dead (and also was criticized a lot if I remember right). I totally agree that we should have kept it. But, we didn't. McD tried a QB that was supposed to fit the scheme better. It didn't, but at least he TRIED.
"Try" doesn't cut it in the NFL.
-
2 minutes ago, joesixpack said:
Wish we had case keenum.
LOL. You wished you had Peterman too. We all saw how knowledgeable you were as a result.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, joesixpack said:
Well mercifully the organization doesn’t operate at the whims of your doubts.
Nah...we just get garbage decisions that reek of the unprepared and inexperienced. McChuckleNuts and company don't know what in the hell their objective is, much less how to get there.
-
4 minutes ago, LarryMadman said:
Still no answer huh!
Week 1 - 16 for 28 for 224 yards and two touchdowns. 38 yards rushing. It should have been three touchdowns, but Clay let one bounce off his hands in the end zone and it was picked off.
Week 3 - 20 for 26 for 213 yards and two touchdowns. No turnovers.
Week 4 - 12 for 20 for 182 yards and a touchdown. No turnovers.
Week 5 - 20 for 33 for 268 yards and a touchdown. 53 yards rushing on just 6 carries. No turnovers.
Week 6 - 20 for 27 for 165 yards and a touchdown. Touchdown run, as well. No turnovers.
If you don't consider his play as having a lot to do with those wins, you're either clueless or a troll.
-
1 hour ago, 1billsfan said:
I challenge you to find me any recent story of Paxton Lynch being a serious option for the Broncos future.
It took less than 30 seconds.
https://milehighsports.com/the-time-is-now-for-paxton-lynch-following-the-loss-to-the-bengals/
QuoteAlso, Nathan Peterman will be eventually seen as 100 times the better NFL QB than Paxton Lynch.
LOL. That officially put you into the "knows zero about football" camp.
-
19 minutes ago, 1billsfan said:
Trevor Siemian was benched for Brock Osweiler.
BTW, your declarative statement about Lynch cracked me up.
Let me spell it out slowly for you. Siemian being benched wasn't much of a story because the Broncos have a young, former first round pick waiting in the wings...it doesn't matter if he was benched for Osweiler because neither of them are the Bronco's future. That's why Lynch is starting this week...it was inevitable. No one had any notion that Siemian was going to be the long term starter.
Meanwhile, we have a fifth rounder with a ceiling of career backup replacing a two year starter that everyone outside of Buffalo thinks is solid.
If you can't understand why one makes news and the other doesn't, then you're just being obtuse.
Elway: Upgrading QB is the Broncos' Top Goal
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Prove it.