Jump to content

costrovs

Community Member
  • Posts

    201
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by costrovs

  1. 2 hours ago, The Jokeman said:

    That throw where he moved into the pocket and got smashed by the Jags and hit Robert Foster for a TD still remains to me Josh's best. 

    This one right here. When you have multiple defenders about to tackle you, and the QB knows it, it just makes the throw that much more impressive. This was what, 2018? 2019? It still remains my favorite, gonna be hard to top this one.

  2. 4 hours ago, Niagara Dude said:

    I said it was wise to let Shaq go,  but bad decision on letting Philips leave for Butler.  Did Butler even make one big play during his time.  He and Star were trash and Star was one of Beane's worse signings.  I don't want to hear about doing his job, he was average at best and paid 3 times he worth.  Screwed the team during covid and then last season missed so many games when the team needed him

    You, me and a couple other people on this board are probably the only ones that knew that letting shaq go, and keeping Phillips was the best idea.

    Kudos to us for actually using our eyes and common sense. 

    • Eyeroll 1
  3. 25 minutes ago, TPS said:

    There was one play in the 4th Q where someone came flying up the middle and nailed Stafford just as he threw a pass, but unfortunately there was no replay.  Anyone know who nearly decapitated him?

    I want to say it was one of the DT's but Idk...

    11 minutes ago, Niagara Dude said:

    Jordan Philips was dominating in getting into the backfield,  everyone talks about Miller but we now have both size and push up the middle because of the offseason signings including Philips who we should have never let go.

    True that. At that time most people on this board didn't want him resigned, saying that his 9.5 sacks were "coverage sacks" so they don't count. AND he was asking too much... but yet, most people also thought that paying Lawson $13M+/ year was acceptable. Which is what Miami ended up paying him for his 1 year of service.
    Lawson - 13M/year - 4 sacks in Miami

    Phillips - 10M/year - 2 sacks in Arizona

    Butler - 13M/ 2 years - 0 sacks, and he was horrible for us.

     

    Yeah, it 100% would have been better to keep Phillips for that price. 

    I'll take 10M/year for his 9.5 "coverage sacks"

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  4. 1 hour ago, Ya Digg? said:

    He has been the unquestioned #2 since the moment he became a Bill and that has nothing to do with this board. The coaching staff sees him as a much better option than Barkley. Most backup QBs switch teams every year or every other year, that’s part of the job. 
    just think how deep you had to go to get a Barkley game to make your point-mop up duty against a team that had given up because they were already down over 20 points (cue the “well he also had a really good game against the jets 5 years ago) 

    I didn't have to go deep at all to think of a game Barkley played well for us in. We had Trubisky as our back up last year and Barkley the 3 years prior. He must be a pretty good back up if we kept him for 3 years and now we brought him back again....  

  5. 4 hours ago, muppy said:

    I read the 2bd board  quite a bit. But I honestly had no idea that at least here most posters opine that Keenum is QB2 with (as according to the emoji response) disagreeing with your post.  So Barkley is a goner to the practice squad?.   . Keenum upgrade from Barkley is consensus opinion.

    I think people forgot about how horrible Keenum played 2 weeks ago, and how good Barkley played in our 56-26 romp of the Dolphins week 16 of the 2020-2021 season.

    But yeah, I guess a QB on his 8th team in 10 years is reasonable for most people on this board.

    • Eyeroll 1
  6. 7 minutes ago, Captain Caveman said:

     

    I'm not sure how that's relevant to what I posted? I'm answering someone who said they wish Cover1 received credentials to improve the coverage of other local media. I was saying if they do get credentialed they'll have to follow the same practice rules as the other media (negatively impacting Cover1's coverage rather than improving anyone else's coverage.)

     

    Although maybe you're right (if this is what you're saying?) - if the Pegulas wanted to restrict Cover1, the easiest way to do it would be to give them media credentials.  

    I'm agreeing with you. and yes, that is what I'm saying. Either that or kick them off the property. 

    But I'd like to think that the Bills might be embracing what Cover1 does, since they have neither given them credentials, or kicked them off the property.

     

×
×
  • Create New...