Jump to content

Matt_In_NH

Community Member
  • Posts

    7,968
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Matt_In_NH

  1. 10 minutes ago, Juice_32 said:

    I'd rather have Teddy B. Bradford is probably the FA I'd be the least excited about. 

    The legend of Bridgewater

    Bridgwaters best year he had 3200 yards, 14 TDs and 9 INTs' 192 rushing yards and 3 more TD's. That is a slight downgrade from what Taylor has done. Not to mention the guy has not played in 2 years.

    • Like (+1) 3
    • Thank you (+1) 2
  2. A smart organization knows you need a great QB to build a winning franchise.  Sure you can make a run here and there, get into the playoffs sometimes and maybe, just maybe once in a blue moon win it all with a guy like Glennon or Bridgewater.  But to win year in and year out requires one main ingredient, a franchise QB.  A smart organization leaves no stone unturned, does not rule anything out when it comes to finding that franchise QB.  

     

    I don't think the QB's are just a crap shoot this year either, sure there is no "Andrew Luck" but there seem to be 4 confirmed high end prospects.  You can have whatever DL, CB and LB you want, it wont affect wins and losses much.  A franchise QB on the other hand can directly contribute a lot to winning.    Just look at he Packers last year when Rodgers went out or SF when they started Garapplolo

  3. 1 hour ago, Bendernaught said:

    This is an interesting mock.

     

    Is Baker Mayfield worth 21, 22 and a first in 2019?

     

    Post NFL Scouting Combine Mock

     

    I dont like the idea of next years first being part of a trade up.  That pick could end up being quite high if they start a rookie QB.  Also, if the rookie plays really bad you could use that high pick on another QB.I would rather opt for a 2 this year and next year and 21,22.  Also consider player compensation if possible.  

  4. I think they are planning to trade up if it works out for them but I dont think these signings are necessarily just for that.  I think it definitely shows the desire to get some comp picks.   But more than anything this team has very few players under contract and tons of FA' so they need bodies.   

     

    Signing guys to short contracts is beneficial in a bunch of ways....it allows you to be more likely to get comp picks since you will have a lot of FA's.   Guys on one year contracts play better because they are going for a big contract, they are hungry and motivated.  You dont kill your cap with big signing bonuses you owe to players who stop playing as hard after they get a pile of money....

  5. 10 hours ago, Fadingpain said:

     

    Another point he mentions:

     

    When won the turnover battle, we were 8-1.


    When we tied or lost the turnover battle, we were 1-6.

     

    Historical Stats say 2 easiest ways to win a game are:

     

    1) Win turnover battle or 

    2) Win return TD battle; this means any type of "return" on special teams for a TD (punt return, KO return, blocked FG returned for TD) or a turnover taken in for a TD (fumble recovery taken in or pick 6)....you win 75% of the time when you have more of these types of TDs than your opponent.

     

     

     

     

    Gotta win more when we tie the turnover differential.  The fact the Bills lose most of those points to lesser talent they have.

×
×
  • Create New...