Real McClappy

You must ask Toto No doubt

Well it could be worse I guess. The Bills have one side of the ball in check at least to build off of. But this WORST OFFENSIVE DVOA THROUGH 9 GAMES, 1986-2018 Year Team DVOA 2018 BUF -53.9% 2005 SF -53.0% 2002 HOU -47.0% 2010 CAR -45.9% 2013 JAX -44.5% 1992 SEA -44.3% 2007 SF -43.8% 1996 STL -43.0% 2009 OAK -42.7% 1992 IND -39.9% 2006 OAK -39.7% 2004 MIA -38.6%

Dude, we still get Fitzpatrick threads

I would have had no issues if that turd found it's way to Edelman or Brady. What a waste of a perfectly good turd.

For what's it's worth I have seen worse performances by a guy named the same. There is a ton of truth in this statement that I has witnessed several times on those long drinking nights.

He was being astute. 1.4 Billion is chump change for a NFL team that will pay for itself in 4-5years. The team is already worth 1.6B as I type. It must be really nice to own a team for 3 years and make 1 Billion in revenue and have the team value increase 28%. I highly doubt they are embarrassed with a a very, very solid investment.

This is understood and not what I'm trying to get at here in this thread. What about a PF for defenseless WR in a league that is supposed to be trying to protect it's players? We can talk about it being a bad play call all day by Daboll being short of the sticks but that doesn't change the fact that Zay was blown up from behind that lead to a pick 6. If this is acceptable, defensive cord strategy and DB coverage in the NFL should change all together to take advantage of it? Just knock the piss out of WR's and TE's at the LOS all game.

I see the hit 2-3 yards away from Zay, not bang bang.

I have looked at this play several times and understand the rule as to why it's not a PI on a rub route that needs to be 1 yard past the LOS to be "true" PI. This is damn near close to 1 yard past the sticks and debatable but whatever. What I don't understand is if the league is truly trying to protect it's players how the hell is this still not called for hit on a defenseless WR or helmet to helmet foul? At the 3 second mark Zay gets destroyed from behind while the ball is in the air 2.5 yards away from him.

Drafting Skill positions will no doubt. There is no harm in spending $ on proven Oline man in FA to keep all that matters upright and a running game churning.

This is where we disagree. I have zero issues if the Bills spent 30 mill bringing in 3 stud/proven O-line guys from FA. I don't want to have to think or worry about the O-line for many, many years. I much rather a team blow their wad on a top QB and O-line over anything else in today's game but that is just me. White, Milano and Dawkins are locked up for the next 2.5 years. I highly doubt Beane and McD are thinking chess or 3 moves ahead when they are in a win now checkers mode. I mean, look at half our fan base and media right now. We got that monkey off our backs last year and this coaching staff is only 50% through their visioned rebuild (all in 1.5 years) but everyone must be fired?

You guys get a pass this week. It's understandable as we did not have many positives yesterday anywhere.

This is it Dawg. We have to give him the weapons to make a clear decision.

What are we sitting on 90 million for? If Beane and McD are smart they invest heavily into the O-line come FA on proven players. College lineman, you cannot trust them as a day1 starters anymore if drafted high. Use the draft to correct the WR and TE positions. Invest a 3rd-4th rd pick on a real QB2 with high upside. The D is fine aside from a CB#2 right now. Mcd had 2 years to play around on the D side, it's time for Offense.

I like the thought all around on the draft. How about Free agency?

So what is your suggestion on correcting QB, OL, WR, RB and TE?

Isn't that how it typically works?

I'm not done until I see what happens next FA and draft. If we don't address the O properly my pitchfork will most likely come out as well. AJM Kerley Coleman Are still my biggest ?'s or WTF moments from Beane. Also, you need to look at the last draft. Are fans ok with taking the following over O-Line and WR help? Harrison Phillips Taron Johnson Siran Neal

If we had a solid WR core without KB I cut his ass to make an example of him. Sadly, we only have Zay. I'd rather see balls bounce off KB's hands from Allen to at least somewhat support him. KB signing was/is flat out bad for this FO. I think this is one all fans and TBD'ers agree on for once?

They are there for the taking with long term contracts. What the FO here does with that is out of my control. The O-line should be the #1 priority for Beane come free agency. Here is the list. https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/offensive-line/

The O-line FA's are solid and ample. We can rebuild our entire O-line alone in FA, with proper long term contracts. WR's in FA are weak and we will need to address in the draft and possible trades. Everything else is there.

Can some explain to me how 90mill during FA and 10 draft picks cannot result in 7-8 new Offensive starters next year? The only thing I ever see is no one will sign in Buffalo which is non-sense.

Fair enough, we see the outcome as different which is cool. Even if Tyrod had us at 3-6 somehow what does that accomplish though realistically? Trading him for the 1st pick in the 3rd was a great move IMO, he was not worth a 16mill cap hit that would have pushed a different player off the roster if we kept him.. Beane not getting a seasoned vet or mentor was just a flat out bad decision once Allen went down. For me trading AJM was a boneheaded rookie FO decision. He had it nailed down originally and got his Peterman goggles on.

With Daboll's play calling and our current O-line affairs, how do fans that told us how Tyrod feel about what would have gone down if he was our starter all year? I personally feel it would have been an absolute train wreck. People would be saying everyone needs to be fired for keeping Tyrod on this team. The Bills FO faults are the O-line, KB (or not having a real #1 WR) and a proper mentor QB (not named Tyrod) for Allen. I'm still up in the air as to what Daboll is at this point.

He lead in sacks 2016 (42 sacks) and 3rd in 2017 (46 sacks). 2017 only had 14 game starts though so would have taken the crown if he started all 16 games. He would have been absolutely destroyed behind our current line with a poor running game like it is now.