Jump to content

GoBills808

Community Member
  • Posts

    14,684
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by GoBills808

  1. 2 minutes ago, Mark Vader said:

    It is Florida Vs. Florida State.

    it's also unfortunately the highest ever drafted WR in the McDermott/Beane era vs our DB4 who doesn't see the field

    • Sad 1
  2. 2 minutes ago, Buffalo03 said:

    I think you're naive if you think any any woman may not lead you on at any random time. These are professional athletes with lots of money. I think it's very safe to assume that even at work, yes, a woman can lead a guy on at work. I'm not saying it happened in this situation but for you to make a sarcastic remark like it would never ever ever ever happen is just naive. 

    In fairness, a recent Benedictine College study has shown 97% of women in the workforce are simply too disoriented being out of the kitchen to focus on their job

    • Haha (+1) 1
  3. 20 minutes ago, Slippery Rubber Mats said:

    They thought we wouldn't notice, got cocky

     

    Jomblar Nutterham won't be at practice tomorrow, watch

    That's ok we just signed Pinkus Bramblethorn IV as insurance 

    • Haha (+1) 4
  4. 13 minutes ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said:

     

    You missed this one

     

    3rd & 20 at BUF 40

    (6:27 - 3rd) (Shotgun) J.Allen pass deep left intended for G.Davis INTERCEPTED by K.Fuller at WAS 19. K.Fuller to WAS 19 for no gain (G.Davis). WAS-K.Fuller was injured during the play.

     

    I remember a post on Reddit someone put together a list for the top 5 least damaging INTs of the season for the entire league. Josh had 3 of the top 5. So yea, throwing 3 arm punt INTs over the season isn't some huge number, but when Josh has thrown more of those than the rest of the league combined I think it's a fair thing to bring up. 

    yes

     

    they measure EPA as a component of QB ints which is a measure of how 'bad' your INTs are

     

    Allen's were less damaging in terms of epa than guys like Hurts, Purdy, Mahomes, Tua etc

    • Haha (+1) 1
  5. 18 minutes ago, FireChans said:

    Sure, but the rate of holding, roughing the punter, blocks in the back, muffed punts is all much much much higher than any negative things happening after an interception.

     

    All I know is TBD’s definitely starting acting like TO’s don’t matter when they got a QB who turns it over a ton.  

    When you're scoring an historic amount of TDs they matter less, correct

    • Agree 1
  6. 31 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

     

     

    Yeah c'mon @NewEra .......better reserves alone does not equal a deeper WR corps. :lol:

     

    Sure you replaced your 11 catch Trent Sherfield with an 18 catch Mack Hollins..........and your 15 catch Harty with a 21 catch MVS.      

     

    But how much do these 1-a-game kinda' catch guys move the needle and make the offense "great"? 

     

     

     

     

     

    Yeah my definition of depth isn't how many JAG wideouts you can accumulate, it's how far you can push them down the depth chart

    • Like (+1) 2
  7. 4 minutes ago, NewEra said:

    Of course I speak of offseason vaguery.  I’m speculating about a group of players that we haven’t seen play together yet.  I’m giving my opinion about the future…. I find it hard to discuss specifics.  
     

    Dallas was the only great offense last year.  Got it.  They weren’t even the best offense. 

     

    I should’ve just said an offense capable of winning a Super Bowl knowing someone would nitpick.

     

    i calculate “deepest” using my opinion on the WRs 4-6 in the past vs this years.  It’s not very difficult.  Rocket science 


     


     

     

    But that's kind of like calculating the deepest pool by measuring the width of the shallow end isn't it

     

    Depth at the top of the roster is a lot more important than the guys who aren't going to be getting nearly as many reps

  8. On 5/22/2024 at 12:33 PM, HoofHearted said:

    College defenses are way different than what you see in the NFL. Offenses attack players and coverages with their pass game. Most colleges are basing out of Quarters coverage - not so much in the NFL - so take anything you see from LSU with a grain of salt from a concept perspective. However, what it does illustrate is Brady's ability to scheme guys open vs coverages using various concepts.

    I don't watch much college football

     

    How difficult can it be to run a college offense w Joe Burrow, Jamarr Chase, and Justin Jefferson tho

    • Like (+1) 1
  9. 1 hour ago, HappyDays said:

     

    We haven't added, we've subtracted. Davis, Harty, and Sherfield all have replacements on the roster. Diggs does not.

     

    But my point is that every single offense can argue they have "multiple good options." That's a meaningless statement because it's the utter floor of any offense that exists in the modern NFL.

    objectively correct

     

    We we actually have is a borderline top10 TE, a borderline top 5ish RB, and a WR room comprised entirely of guys who in their combined NFL careers have never cracked 875 yards/season which for reference would have been good for the 44th ranked wideout by yards last year.

     

    so there's optimism and then there's reality...let's not confuse the two

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 2
  10. 1 hour ago, eball said:

     

    I'm amazed by how many fans don't want to acknowledge the concept of quantity (multiple "good" players) over quality (a true WR1) when you have an all-world QB who can distribute the ball.

     

    It puts SO much more pressure on the defense when they can't just try to take away one strength.

     

     

     

    i know you probably didn't mean it this way but this reads as having less talent makes you more difficult to defend

     

    can you give me an example of the concept you are referring to?

×
×
  • Create New...