-
Posts
14,684 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by GoBills808
-
-
3 hours ago, eball said:
On any given play the Bills have 5 “skill” options in addition to Josh. We can disagree, but I think choosing among Kincaid, Samuel, Shakir, Coleman, Knox, Cook, Ray Davis, and (MVS or Hollins or Claypool) gives the Bills plenty of ways to stress the defense.
you can basically do this w every team in the league
- 1
-
2 minutes ago, Buffalo03 said:
I think you're naive if you think any any woman may not lead you on at any random time. These are professional athletes with lots of money. I think it's very safe to assume that even at work, yes, a woman can lead a guy on at work. I'm not saying it happened in this situation but for you to make a sarcastic remark like it would never ever ever ever happen is just naive.
In fairness, a recent Benedictine College study has shown 97% of women in the workforce are simply too disoriented being out of the kitchen to focus on their job
- 1
-
20 minutes ago, Slippery Rubber Mats said:
They thought we wouldn't notice, got cocky
Jomblar Nutterham won't be at practice tomorrow, watch
That's ok we just signed Pinkus Bramblethorn IV as insurance
- 4
-
peanut and its not close
- 1
- 1
-
Brady- 'The last thing I want is for Josh Allen to have to think' lmfao 🤦♂️
- 3
-
13 minutes ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said:
You missed this one
3rd & 20 at BUF 40
(6:27 - 3rd) (Shotgun) J.Allen pass deep left intended for G.Davis INTERCEPTED by K.Fuller at WAS 19. K.Fuller to WAS 19 for no gain (G.Davis). WAS-K.Fuller was injured during the play.
I remember a post on Reddit someone put together a list for the top 5 least damaging INTs of the season for the entire league. Josh had 3 of the top 5. So yea, throwing 3 arm punt INTs over the season isn't some huge number, but when Josh has thrown more of those than the rest of the league combined I think it's a fair thing to bring up.
yes
they measure EPA as a component of QB ints which is a measure of how 'bad' your INTs are
Allen's were less damaging in terms of epa than guys like Hurts, Purdy, Mahomes, Tua etc
- 1
-
18 minutes ago, FireChans said:
Sure, but the rate of holding, roughing the punter, blocks in the back, muffed punts is all much much much higher than any negative things happening after an interception.
All I know is TBD’s definitely starting acting like TO’s don’t matter when they got a QB who turns it over a ton.
When you're scoring an historic amount of TDs they matter less, correct
- 1
-
31 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:
Yeah c'mon @NewEra .......better reserves alone does not equal a deeper WR corps.
Sure you replaced your 11 catch Trent Sherfield with an 18 catch Mack Hollins..........and your 15 catch Harty with a 21 catch MVS.
But how much do these 1-a-game kinda' catch guys move the needle and make the offense "great"?
Yeah my definition of depth isn't how many JAG wideouts you can accumulate, it's how far you can push them down the depth chart
- 2
-
4 minutes ago, NewEra said:
You’re talking about a better unit. Not deeper. But that’s fine, do you
Every team has a congregation of JAGS at the bottom of the depth chart, that's just the reality of filling a roster
The dolphins are probably claiming Berrios and River Cracraft are great depth...because they're behind Hill/Waddle/Beckham Jr
-
Just now, NewEra said:
I explained mine- what’s yours?
The whole room, w emphasis at the top because they're getting majority of the tick
I have almost zero expectations for hollins or claypool similarly as I did for harty or Sherfield last yr
-
2 minutes ago, NewEra said:
I think our 4-6 will be better than theirs based on the current rosters
Ok🤙we have different definitions of depth is all
-
3 minutes ago, NewEra said:
Deep = depth. The depth is WR 4-6- It’s simple. Unless you have a different Interpretation of deep. Which is fine, but it doesn’t change my interpretation or my answer.
Who would you say has the deeper WR corps, us or Minnesota?
-
4 minutes ago, NewEra said:
Of course I speak of offseason vaguery. I’m speculating about a group of players that we haven’t seen play together yet. I’m giving my opinion about the future…. I find it hard to discuss specifics.
Dallas was the only great offense last year. Got it. They weren’t even the best offense.
I should’ve just said an offense capable of winning a Super Bowl knowing someone would nitpick.
i calculate “deepest” using my opinion on the WRs 4-6 in the past vs this years. It’s not very difficult. Rocket science
But that's kind of like calculating the deepest pool by measuring the width of the shallow end isn't it
Depth at the top of the roster is a lot more important than the guys who aren't going to be getting nearly as many reps
-
On 5/22/2024 at 12:33 PM, HoofHearted said:
College defenses are way different than what you see in the NFL. Offenses attack players and coverages with their pass game. Most colleges are basing out of Quarters coverage - not so much in the NFL - so take anything you see from LSU with a grain of salt from a concept perspective. However, what it does illustrate is Brady's ability to scheme guys open vs coverages using various concepts.
I don't watch much college football
How difficult can it be to run a college offense w Joe Burrow, Jamarr Chase, and Justin Jefferson tho
- 1
-
1 minute ago, DapperCam said:
You obviously missed Nico Collins and Tank Dell last year. Big reason why Stroud had a great rookie season.
Yeah they'd both start here imo
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Shortchaz said:
He’s going to have a hard time living up to expectations.
Yeah I disappoint folks for way less
- 1
- 2
-
1 hour ago, HappyDays said:
We haven't added, we've subtracted. Davis, Harty, and Sherfield all have replacements on the roster. Diggs does not.
But my point is that every single offense can argue they have "multiple good options." That's a meaningless statement because it's the utter floor of any offense that exists in the modern NFL.
objectively correct
We we actually have is a borderline top10 TE, a borderline top 5ish RB, and a WR room comprised entirely of guys who in their combined NFL careers have never cracked 875 yards/season which for reference would have been good for the 44th ranked wideout by yards last year.
so there's optimism and then there's reality...let's not confuse the two
- 1
- 2
-
2 minutes ago, nucci said:
we could be sneaky good, right?
Yes imo....there is a path for that, I just think it relies on too many best case scenarios coming to fruition concurrently
-
11 minutes ago, eball said:
Multiple good options > one stud and little else
ok i hope you are right
-
1 hour ago, eball said:
I'm amazed by how many fans don't want to acknowledge the concept of quantity (multiple "good" players) over quality (a true WR1) when you have an all-world QB who can distribute the ball.
It puts SO much more pressure on the defense when they can't just try to take away one strength.
i know you probably didn't mean it this way but this reads as having less talent makes you more difficult to defend
can you give me an example of the concept you are referring to?
-
43 minutes ago, ngbills said:
Bills player misses OTA - who cares its OTA's. Talk to me in September.
Diggs misses OTA's - thank god he is gone. What a bad look. How could anyone do this.
really bad take
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Draconator said:
Make roughing the passer calls an automatic video review.
get rid of video review all together
- 1
-
12 minutes ago, Beast said:
If the shoe was on the other foot and the Bills traded for Diggs, did him a favor and tore up his deal and gave him a 1 year contract, and he didn’t show up for OTA’s, I’d be a teeny bit perturbed.They knew what they were getting
- 2
-
Just now, FireChans said:
This how you know they are teenagers. No Mularkey? No Perry Fewell?
For shame.
Never heard of them😂😂
OTAs 5/28
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
it's also unfortunately the highest ever drafted WR in the McDermott/Beane era vs our DB4 who doesn't see the field