Numark3
-
Posts
2,295 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Numark3
-
-
9 hours ago, Shaw66 said:
Here’s the simple proof. Patrick Mahomes is a great QB. He and Josh Allen are the only QBs in the league who regularly do magical thinks on the field. All the other QBs are just football players; every week, Mahomes and Allen make throws that are among the top highlights on every network. What’s the difference between the two? Well, about five years ago, Mahomes stopped making stupid plays. That’s the difference.
When Allen stops making stupid plays, he will be one of the greatest QBs of all time, possibly even the very best. The only thing keeping Allen from being that great are the mistakes that Jeremy White tells us we should live with.
this is an excellent example of a false narrative. Over the last two years, Allen has a whopping four more interceptions than Mahomes. FOUR. When it comes to stats that try to count “balls that should have been intercepted”, Mahomes and Allen have similar counts. Allen has three more interceptions than Burrows over the same time period.
But Mahomes stopped making stupid plays apparently and Allen is Jekyll and Hyde. If you watched Mahomes, you’d see someone that he does it all the time too. Literally watch the highlights of the Jags game. Watch Burrows be inaccurate as hell the last two weeks and barely move the ball
it’s just an untrue narrative that started with fans, creeped into the local media, and then is now a national narrative. Allen throws about the same amount of interceptions than the other two franchise QBs in the league4 hours ago, SoonerBillsFan said:All QB's do it feom time to time, it's the nature of the beast. But Mahomes, Rogers, Burrow just do it a heck of a lot less.
interception totals the last two years between Allen, Burrows, and Mahomes…29, 26, and 25. Yea I don’t think Mahomes and Burrows do it a heck of a lot less.-
3
-
-
3 minutes ago, NewEra said:
You’ve been screaming for an elected pass rusher for how long? Well….. you have Von Miller. The bengals had 10X the cap space as us. They fixed their OL. Easier to do with your QB on his rookie contract You can’t just compare every team to us and rant that we didn’t do what they did. Situations be different.
I just don’t understand what you expect of Beane. To begin the offseason, you said you were hoping we could add 2 playmakers on both sides of the ball. He added the biggest defensive playmaker on the market. One that no one really thought we had oflanding He added Howard, crowder, Duke Johnson, Saffold. von Miller, Daquan jones and tim settle. We had 2M in cap space.
you always cry and whine about us not going all in. Well….Beane went all in…..and you’re still crying and whining.
RG must be addressed. CB2 must be addressed. They will be. And then you’ll find something else to whine and cry about.
He has been complaining every step of the way as this team has built itself into the superbowl favorites. I mean, it says a lot about his opinions that what he complains about....works
-
4 minutes ago, FireChans said:
The difference is Lamar’s injury wasn’t talked about much at all. The guy is a superstar, on a playoff team (which was recently the 1 seed in the AFC), and it didn’t dominate the news cycle. Which is unusual, IMO
if anything the double standard is in the opposite direction with Rogers. PFT and a lot of media people hate Rodgers and love to dominate the news cycle with negative stuff about him.lamar getting banged up got the same coverage of someone like jimmy G or Tua this year
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, Big Turk said:
Just because you "think" that's your best starting five doesn't mean it actually is. We are talking about the same guy who though benching Tyrod for Peterman was a great idea.
Sometimes a guy who never gets an opportunity to show what he can do in games plays exceptionally well once he does, which is the case with Bates.
Moreso than him just playing well in a vacuum, he plays exceptionally well in tandem with the other lineman in regards to picking up stunts, T-E games, passing players off, pulling, etc...it is no accident the Bills have turned into one of the best rushing teams in the NFL since he has been in there, averaging over 163 yards a game in their last 6 games and over 192 yards a game in their last 3.
you know the bills traded for bates, an undrafted free agent?you know the bills developed him for two years?
you know they inserted him into the lineup and he has found instant success?
maybe, JUST MAYBE, the bills identified a player they liked, developed him, and then played him when he was ready? And that they deserve a ridiculous amount of praise for doing so?
rather than….. “durrrrr why didn’t dah bills play the undrafted player (that I never heard of) sooner. Dumb dumb McDermott.”
-
5
-
-
10 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:
Called it. 😎
😂
Ummmm. We’re only half way there…
(good call!!)
-
Rank the players by their love of football!!!
-
14 minutes ago, NewEra said:
He’s not a Tyreek type talent. Stop. I’m as big a lil dirty fan as you’ll find. This statement is ridiculous
he said “type player”you said “type talent”
-
They moved the ball with ease against us??? What
-
2
-
3
-
-
You don’t want Mac Jones throwing the ball if your a patriots fan
-
On 11/17/2021 at 4:11 AM, ChronicAndKnuckles said:
What the heck happened to that guy? Spiller had that one great season in 2012 where he put up nearly 1700 yards from scrimmage (around 1250 rushing and 450 passing.) The highlights from that year are fun to watch and it's among my favorite single season performances of any Bill, guy was incredibly shifty. Definitely one of the more baffling draft picks of all time. Surprisingly he lasted 9 years in the league.
he came into the league at the wrong time and for the wrong team. He gets drafted the past couple years and he’d be a stud-
1
-
-
I don’t think he is a hero. And he foolishly put himself in a dangerous position that could get people killed.
but he was clearly innocent and it’s wild they took him to trial given the video evidence.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, \GoBillsInDallas/ said:
not guiltywait….guilty of being an iconic badass
-
1
-
-
Just now, unbillievable said:
He should never have been charged
He should have been detained for questioning, pending an investigation.
The DA should have figured out this is text book self defense and let him go if they actually did their job.
Exactly. Thinking people should be arrested and charged with crimes while the government figures out if a crime has been committed is insanity and ass backwards.
people should be charged with crimes…wait for it…when the government believes a crime has been committed and is willing to prosecute it.
here, that video alone results in no charges under any scenario that is not politics.
-
6 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:
Nice analogy there. 🙄Arresting him and charging while things were sorted out is how it is and should be done.
This was, in my mind anyway, not a clear cut case of self defense.
it is a good analogy. It forces you to understand your point was wrong. You can disagree that it was clear cut self-defense, that’s fine. What was silly was saying people who discharge guns and kill people should always get charged.and arresting and charging people with the crimes while you sort stuff out is actually not how it is normally done. Nor how it should be done. And that’s your misunderstanding here.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:
In many people’s eyes he did commit a crime.
that’s nice, law enforcement has discretion.if someone was chopping people up with a machete and ran towards you in public, and you “discharged your gun” killing him…you wouldn’t be charged. Why? Clear cut case of self defense. Surely you’d agree with and back off your idea of anyone discharging their gun and killing someone should be charged with a crime?
here is no different. It’s clear cut. The only reason any case moved forward is because it was politicized.
Just now, Jauronimo said:This is exactly the mindset that is fueling this race to the bottom in American politics. Can't beat em, join em. Culture wars on every front conceivable and beyond is patently moronic.
bull####. Killing people in the streets because you were "trying to protect private property" that you have no connection with will bring charges every single time as it should.
he killed people because they were chasing and attacking him. That’s it. The rest is just noise meant to confuse people like you. It doesn’t matter if he was in Wisconsin to attend a nazi conference or a funeral or church. When people chase and attack you…and you flee…and they keep chasing and attacking you…you have a legal right to protect your life.-
2
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:
So you’re cool with someone killing two and wounding another in public just being let go without any charges. Now THAT doesn’t really make any sense.
in a case where they didnt commit a crime…um yes?charges are for crimes, not sure if you are aware
-
2 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:
You discharge your weapon in public you’re going and should get charged. Let the justice system sort it out. As what happened here.
that’s a really simplistic view of the justice system and doesn’t really make sense, but sure.
people don’t get charged frequently when the outcome is something you’d associate with a crime, including shooting someone with a gun. There is discretion and thought that factors into decision making. It’s nice you want to remove that and make it a black/white rule. Thankfully that’s not the case
-
1
-
1
-
-
Just now, Chef Jim said:
Sorry but he needed to be charged. He discharged his weapon killing two and injuring another.
I don’t think so when there is a video of that person fleeing a mob attacking him and any normal viewer would agree it’s textbook self defense.we don’t normally leave these calls up to a jury, but thankfully we have them
-
Just now, Chef Jim said:
I see. So these deaths are all on Kyle?
I mean, the deaths would have never happened if Kyle’s mom didn’t have sex with his dad either -
7 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:
No one dies that day if Kyle isn't LARPing around Kenosha with a gun.
Well, to be fair, the guy who died when he was strolling around with a gun wouldn’t have died if he didn’t actively attack another guy (who also had a gun)this case was a textbook self-defense case, and would have never resulted in charges of it wasn’t so politicized
-
1
-
-
On 10/17/2021 at 3:03 PM, dollars 2 donuts said:
There, my post fixed above, without being expanded it didn’t show what I highlighted. The “more shaming” part.
I can’t follow any of your posts -
im going to root for the chargers because I'd rather play in LA if they beat us out for home field advantage
-
1
-
-
I lived in Minnesota for his entire career there and the consensus from most fans was that he was not a bad teammate or lockeroom issue. In fact, when he was traded, a lot of players were upset to lose him.
the consensus was that Kirk cousins was a gigantic ####### and diggs hated being around him. This is supported by weird stories of Kirk being an #######
-
12 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:
Maybe they did but didnt have the platforms or voice to get it accomplished. I'd say the work "attack" is a bit overblown too. Keep in mind that it was NOT Twitter backlash or uproar that ended Gruden. None of that even had a chance to get rolling before he resigned. This was strictly because he 1. lost the locker room, and 2. insulted all the bosses. Accountability and consequences for actions isnt a horrible thing.
Ehhh, yes and no. Specifically to this Gruden leak, he is in a direct position to hire staff and make player personnel decisions. So when emails pop up, even from 10+ years ago, talking about which vulnerable groups he doesnt think should be employed... yeah it has bearing on what happens today. After that, he'd never be able to make a cut or a hire that wouldnt get put through the filter of "Is this valid, or just his biases showing up?", and rightfully so.
But they are from the WFT office emails. Work emails are never private. They arent releasing someone's gmail account.
I mean, you are aware of some of the stuff already confirmed was happening in Snyder's offices. Right?
They would be releasing gmail emails sent to a work email. There is no reason to release irrelevant private emails
if Susie G is saying come home late because she has diarrhea, you don’t need that email
if two employees are saying GOSH THAT NEW TRAINEE IS SLOOOOW…that doesn’t need to be made public
Tight End Stats Through 5 games
in The Stadium Wall
Posted · Edited by Numark3
Is it a goal to have TE production? For the most part, the offense is humming and the TEs are a part of it. What is the issue or your point?
Hey Dorsey, we want more TE production:
dorsey: Why?
idk