Jump to content

FarrellsFinest

Community Member
  • Posts

    125
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by FarrellsFinest

  1. 1 hour ago, glazeduck said:

    We've got 2 picks in the next 57 selections. From those spots, it feels likely that at least 4 QBs will go, I'll conservatively say 11 DL go, and we could conceivably find use for picks at just about every position. So that means 2 picks in the next 42 with any real consequence to our roster building. I see a pretty clear tier of quality guys and then... less-so guys. Here's hoping we can figure out a way to get 2 of these 30 (qbs/dl removed)...

     

    Breece Hall

    Kenneth Walker

    George Pickens

    Christian Watson

    Skyy Moore

    Alec Pierce

    Jalen Tolbert

    John Metchie

    Trey McBride

    Bernhard Raiman

    Rasheed Walker

    Nic Petit-Frere

    Sean Rhyan

    Dylan Parham

    Darrian Kinnard

    Jamaree Salyer

    Nakobe Dean

    Christian Harris

    Leo Chenal

    Chad Muma

    Troy Anderson

    Channing Tindall

    Brian Asamoah

    Andrew Booth

    Kyler Gordon

    Roger McCreary

    Tariq Woolen

    Jalen Pitre

    Jaquan Brisker

    Sign me up gor Woolen!

    • Like (+1) 1
  2. 1 hour ago, Ya Digg? said:

    So then what if it’s the 6th best cb when the Bills pick? Do you still HAVE to take a cb? 

    No! 

    5 hours ago, Vickveto said:

    I don’t believe that at all Tariq Woolen finished with a perfect RAS score and great senior bowl. I love Jalen Pitre  straight playmaker. Kalon Barnes legit 4.2 speed we could use him against Miami. Lastly I don’t think booth is a 1 round lock he has injury concerns. He could go as late as the middle of the second.

    If your 40 time made you a good football player the radiers would have more rings than the pats right now.

  3. 2 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

     

    Worthless. Everyone here knows Pro Bowls are a joke when Josh doesnt even make it. And Edmunds has only ever made it as an alternative.

     

     

    Already documented what I want to see earlier in the thread with real stat examples.

     

     

    Way to be a d!ck about it when no one else here is. WhoTF are you anyways?

    Im just a random nobody fan like you giving my 2 cents where nobody really wants it.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  4. 14 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

     

    I am specifically referring to the 2 games Klein filled in for Edmunds. One being the Colts which was our worst D performance. And the other being against the Jets, where Klein played well, but you'll all just say "yeah, but it was the Jets". The Colts were going to run all over us whether it was Klein or Edmunds in the middle.

     

    There are too many bad/missed/broken tackles, the Fournette is just the easiest example to remember without digging through tape (which I aint doin). But on that play alone, it would have stopped their drive, and likely change the outcome of the game. I know a lot of other things factored into that loss, but there was a play that Edmunds could have stepped up, made a play (a simple tackle at that) and had a positive impact on the game. And he... just... didnt...

     

    Anyways, I'm bowing out of this thread. Good discussion, but we're all just re-re-re-arguing our opinions which wont change. It's up to Edmunds to prove it on the field now. I truly hope he does.

     

     

    The age is a bad stat/excuse. How about Josh after 4 years in the league, or Milano after 4 years in the league. When does it click for Edmunds?

    Well he is a 2x pro bowler so...i get it you want him to be even better. All im saying is i think he will even meet your expectations if you wrote them down before the season. As a matter a fact what would be exceptable for you sir?  Just so i can throw it in your face after the season and you still want him gone.

  5. 10 minutes ago, FireChans said:

    Thank you.

     

    the only thing more annoying that the “haters” are the folks that can not seem to believe that Edmunds has a ton of bad plays on tape. That his negative plays are always the product of another player. 


    Edmunds gets toasted in coverage? Well the pass rush didn’t get there. Edmunds blocked out of a run play? Well the DL got tangled up. Bites hard on play action and gets the ball tossed over his head on a crosser? Well everyone else is playing bad against the run.

     

    How many times has it been argued that Milano has suffered from a poor DL hanging him out to dry? Legitimately could be zero on TBD, because MILANO HAS A TON OF POSITIVE PLAYS. Somehow Edmunds is the only defender that is so grossly affected by poor DL play or no safety help or power run schemes  or misdirection or play action.

    If Edmunds was a QB, he’d be Baker Mayfield today.

    We can agree to disagree. Imagine people being this hard on Matt Milano at 23 years old when he couldnt beat out Ramon Humber.

×
×
  • Create New...