erynthered

Ironic, eh, Mr. Vice President? You freakin Moron. http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=271573

At least she withdrew. I wonder if the others will follow her lead. NOT!! http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9...;show_article=1

Wow. Isint that the truth.

I think woman, such as yourself ask for to much. Constantly wanting any man to change. You fell in love with us the way we were. The grind is how you do it. Let me also add I've been happily married for just about 20 years. Though the grind through the early years were that she wanted the man to change. MAKE UP YOUR MIND!! You say yes when we ask you to marry us and we are who we are, but then you want to carve out something we're not. We revolt.

230 is the best I've done.

Is Tony Romo still hitting that?

Vegas, KD. Vegas!!

Check their mug shots out. http://mj.933flz.com/pages/mainfeed.html?f...article=4919699

Thats what I meant. Thanks for making it clearer.

No I havent read, and probably wont. Did you read it? In the post above you praise it, and yet you didnt read it. Christ!! From what I've read about it in the WSJ and other print, the Package IMO, sucks Donkey rooster!!! Yes. I said Donkey rooster!!

You want transparency? They should have it where every single spending item has to stand on its own merit. Like that will ever happen. How many in this country will actually read that 693 page bill?

I do see your point, G. I just dont like it. Hand picking the lowest policy risks in the state is OK with you? In my business now, and the other business I was in for over 25 years, if you wanted the good stuff you had to take some crap with it. No Cherry picking.

Speaking of B-Ball check out this shot.

This is ridiculous. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1233104665...emEditorialPage The Bill. PDF file: http://www.rules.house.gov/111/LegText/111_hr1_text.pdf

50's not old you freakin Midget!!

Thats the key word!! Great times!!

Maybe regulation was the wrong word to use. Also, I dont feel I'm being fleeced, I dont have SF. My issue is the cherry picking. I think they should have told them "If you want to end HO policy's, you cant write anything else" http://www.tampabay.com/news/business/bank...ticle971104.ece

What I want is a fair market. A competitive market. If one insurance company can pick and choose its policy's and another can not, there has to be regulation. You cant have one company or more taking on the risk of potential hurricanes and another not. It should be the same across the board. It should be all or nothing when it comes to writing any insurance policy's across this country.

In addition, the Liberal fishrag newspaper down here is lambasting SF for their move, yet you defending them is Hilarius.

Has nothing to do with me now. I Changed Insurance company's years ago. What I have a problem with is any Insurance company cherry picking policy holders, any insurance company. Why not just write Life insurence policy's for woman aged 18 to 40? I'd make a sh-- load of money there, you? So why do you think the Florida Legislature voted down their request for that 47% increase?

For the dense.... Why is it that any state would allow an insurance company to hold them hostage over their belief that they should be able to raise insurance rates only on homeowners policies and let them have free rein on cherry picking policy holders in other policies to fit their profit margins. It should be all or nothing. God you're an idiot. Shouldnt you be bumping one of your own threads on the wall, right now?

Another one missing the point. Though I'm not surprised.

Sheas! That was it, and no !@#$lip I was the one tripin my brains out. ROCK ON MOFO!

Help me here Chef. Did they not play Kleinhans, also? Very foggy, but I remember a balcony I was on shaking like a Mother!@#$er, thinking that the sonofabitch was gonna fall.