Donald Duck
-
Posts
1,609 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Donald Duck
-
-
Kurt Cobain
-
No thanks. Browns can keep him
The Bills have went over a decade without a franchise QB and what has it gotten us?
We will all never agree on the same QB, and none of us can predict a players future, but from a team perspective we can all agree we need a good QB to throw it Sammy or he gets wasted like Eric Moulds.
We need a QB...
-
Dynasty team normally consists of 3 key ingredients on Offense, a star RB, star WR, and most importantly, a star QB. The Buffalo Bills have been searching for that ever elusive franchise QB for over a decade. I realize Johnny football may not be everyones idea of a franchise QB, but ask yourself this, If you block out the name Manziel, replace it with a potential franchise young QB prospect of your choice does the trade make sense.
None of us can predict the future from a player perspective, but from a team perspective without a franchise QB the Buffalo Bills are a good example of how an NFL football team performs without an above average QB leading the team. Average to sub par QB play gets you average to sub par results.
Buffalo has the star WR in Sammy Watkins, and it would be to the Bills best interest not to waste time finding the franchise QB to go with him as soon as possible. Once the Browns play Manziel the chance to trade for him may slip away, just as easily as JF slipped away from would be tacklers at the collegiate level.
Browns HC, the Defensive minded Mike Pettine's knees would buckle at the thought of having the Legendary Alonso play for him on Defense in Cleveland IMO. A legend for a legend...
...what if...
-
Start EJ. Where is this going with Orton, 7-9, maybe 8-8, sure as hell not 10-6.
At least with giving EJ another 6 games, we can see if he's made any progress sitting and learning. I'm not getting my hopes up, but, I think it's worth a shot.
I'm sure the Doug's won't do it, would be interpreted as a sign they are "giving up" on season
To me its giving the keys back to EJ with the team at 500 and the opposite of giving up on the season,
why waste time when we can find out this season If EJ's the guy or not...
-
Finding a franchise QB needs to be Buffalo's top priority now IMO,
So yes, start EJ and finish evaluating him because we already know what we have in Kyle Orton
-
Myself personally, I like D Marone and don't think a revolving door at HC will ever accomplish anything,
but given a choice, I've always thought Gruden would be a great fit for Buffalo
-
Good luck today Kujo!
-
Perfect fit for Palmer and the Cards
-
Farm animal porn star, I knew it
-
Depends on what you mean by "accomplish." I think they'll pass lots of bills. I think they'll all be vetoed, and very few of them will become laws. And I think the Republicans in Congress would consider that "accomplishment."
At some point, it'll probably become an "I'm rubber, you're glue" game of each accusing the other of being obstructionist (Obama claiming Congress is obstructing his agenda, Congress complaining Obama's obstructing their legislative work). That'll be completely sickening.
yet very satisfying for Republicans...
-
Ummm. The Texans have a bottom 5 defense in terms of total yards allowed per game. They are middle of the pack for points against. Those aren't the things associated with a top defense.
and thanks in part to Fitzy we even lead Houston in the giveaway/takeaway department
-
disagree - chan had to dedicate too many resources to a failing defense that swapped schemes every year he was here. i bet he wouldve loved to have more shiny toys to play with, but figured if it was him getting by with warm bodies, or george edwards doing it he would rather put the weight on himself.
I agree,
Gailey knew he could do more with less and the Bills D sucked
-
Correct me If I'm wrong fellas,
Bills beat KC and the Bungles beat the Browns, Buffalo will hold the 6th and final seed
which would put us in the drivers seat...
-
-
old. immobile. an int waiting to happen.
still the best we have right now. but in the future we need better.
Old at 31? nawww
Its possible we may have gotten Kyle Orton at the best point in his career IMO
-
You're an idiot.
thats the nicest thing you've said to me today
-
No, you're not even. EII gave an explanation. You gave a half-assed bizarro-world cluster-!@#$ of disconnected blather whose only accomplishment was to butcher the very meaning of the word "unilateral."
And EII never makes a comprehensible point. When EII is making more sense than you, you've got a serious problem. The sort of problem that likely requires medical intervention.
All this trash talk because you have a poor vocabulary? Since when does unilateral become unilateralism?
hahahahahahahahaha,
Good try though,
-
If you understand, then why do you keep disagreeing with everyone based on a completely different subject?
I'm not disagreeing with your concerns, just explaining why ...
-
-
The best thing about Kyle Orton is you can basically "scratch that position off" as a weakness on the team......
For us? That is a big thing.......now can move onto why we cannot run the ball
true that John, good point
-
We're not talking about the president's command authority, you friggin' dipshit. We're talking about the inconsistency of the presentation.
I understand, but when I told you I shared your concerns I wasn't speaking the right language
-
the military may function as it's own separate entity, but the president is commander-in-chief of all the armed forces, so he's absolutely directly involved and completely responsible for the military's involvement in the fight to combat ebola in west Africa, having been the one to deploy the troops in the first place.
I don't understand at all your statement 'United States Goverment handles the Ebola crisis not only seperate from the military, but the state to state legislation differs. (working unilaterally)'
state to state legislation differs? unilaterally???
the president has insinuated himself into the manner in which individual states handle the ebola scare, specifically by making statements and taking a stand against what governors Cuomo and Christie felt was the proper way to handle the issue in their respective states. Obama has also taken it upon himself to appoint an 'ebola czar', increasing the federal government's role in the handling of the issue even further.
when you have a president ordering quarantines for the soldiers that he deploys, and at the same time speaking out against any such quarantines here at home, after having directly involved himself in how this is handled both in Africa and domestically, then you indeed have a hypocritical handling of things.
Thats my point, the President doesn't have the same kind of authority over civilians as he does the military.
Ask yourself this, are all laws the same from state to state? Is every state governed the same way?
I understand the desire to have everyone on the same page,
again, there is no easy answer IMO.
-
Tried what? You're not even having the same conversation as everyone else.
Ebola researchers banned from tropical disease conference...
http://news.sciencem...-louisiana-says
Smart.
Let me spell it out for you.
Military handles the Ebola crisis as a seperate entity, with its own rules to follow, its own chain of command, and missions to complete. (working unilaterally)
United States Goverment handles the Ebola crisis not only seperate from the military, but the state to state legislation differs. (working unilaterally)
So why would you expect the same actions taken when a branch of the military is doing its job? Or the same so called message given?
Its really not that hard to understand IMO...
-
What does "the administration saying one thing and doing the opposite" have to do with unilateralism? What the !@#$ are you talking about? What is wrong with you?
What is wrong with you? hahahaha
Oh well, I tried..
How Much of a "Hometown" Crowd Can We Expect in the Motor City
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted