Jump to content

d_wag

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,427
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by d_wag

  1. I'd give money to wood and carrington right now, or at least make the effort to.

     

    Wood seems like the type of guy who likes buffalo and is committed to the new staff. Yes he has his injury woes but he provides leadership and stability to the line. To lose him a year after Levitre would hurt.

     

    I think Carrington is in for a big year and after 12 he showed how useful he can be as a rotational player, not to mention his ability to block kicks. Not looking at a cap buster here - decent signing bonus should get this done.

     

    Buffalo can't afford to develop guys and let them walk for nothing. Takes two to make a deal but Whaley should be busting his ass to make this happen. I'm skeptical they are making much of an effort.

  2. I didnt see where he got hurt and he played a lot of the game on Thursday. I think he is suffering from the dreaded "He's-too-raw-to-keep-but-too-good-to-risk-release-itis. They could use the IR exemption on him later in the season, in case of serious injury to one of the tackles.

     

    i believe the IR exemption needs to be declared before the season starts - and you only get one of them.........mcgee and brooks are leading contenders for that spot IMO

  3. On the contrary, cap space is totally irrelevant at this point as Bills are healthy under the cap even with TTs big salary. Cutting him would be meaningless from a cap perspective. Cutting him is serious from a cash standpoint though, because Littman needs to sign off paying a waste of a roster spot a guaranteed $2.5 million for one weeks work.

     

    cap space is never irrelvant or meaningless...........it can be used for extensions, taking larger chunks of signing bonus amortization, or, failing that, rolled into future years......good teams maximize their cap space year after year, they don't waste it

  4. The cap space is wasted. It'll come due now, or later. The gap with any cut and resign would be minimal truly.

     

    you're assuming he's cut.......i'm not, i think he'll make it to opening day at 2.5M and bank that for a couple games worth of backup duty

     

    even if he is cut, to resign him for at even the vet min is a waste of cash as it will be guaranteed once he's on the opening day roster.......would rather roll the dice with jackson for game one and then sign another QB the next day when the salary isn't guaranteed any longer.......this is a silly, wasteful strategy

  5. If they cut him next week and resign him after week one as insurance he'll be on a game by game basis.

     

    To me it's not the cash, as obviously Wilson is OK with its parting. It's the waste of a roster spot that worries me.

     

    it's not the cash, it's the cap space - i'd rather see it devoted to retaining core young players then keeping a journeyman QB on the roster when he has proven time and time again he cannot perform......especially when nix just over a month ago was preaching about how "we can't afford to keep everyone" - which of course you can't if you choose to waste cap space, which they are choosing to do with moves like this

     

    There is no cap concerns whatsoever. Why would you worry about that or mention it? It has nothing to do with any move they would make.

     

    If they cut him 7 days from now, and re-sign him the next day, they would save 1.5 million dollars. And then could keep him as long as they wanted, until Jackson is ready. It's hard for me to imagine, on the eve of the season, another team would pick up Tyler Thigpen and add him to their active roster and cut their #2 or #3.

     

    saving 1.5 million dollars - while wasting 1 million for 2 or 3 games......poor spin.......bills have wasted more then enough money on thipen (and even they admitted that with the jackson trade), time to cut the losses

  6. Because if a team comes in and wants to sign Thigpen now, he would be gone. It will be FAR less likely and the team will know far more about how Jackson is progressing in one week.

     

    i don't buy it....season is 9 days away, not 3 weeks

     

    even if they did cut and then resign thigpen (which is a huge waste of cap space as is given the bonus accelartion) to waste a further 1M to have him around as "jackson" insurance for a 2 or 3 more games is ludicrious

     

    huge mistake going on here, surprised so many are cool with it (or just don't understand the salary cap implications of keeping him around)

  7. Personally, I think Thigpen gets cut this week and then re-signed before the opener to more like a veteran minimum or just around $1,000,000. It's only going to take Jackson two weeks counting this one to get up to speed. They just can't risk Fitz getting hurt in the opener and giving away the game, because it's a division game against a team we may well be battling for a playoff spot. I even think if we were playing an NFC team the first week, we would risk it and just go with two.

     

    so why not just cut him now and resign him? doesn't add up

     

    complete waste of cap space if he makes this roster at 2.5M - but something only the bills would be dumb enough to do, so i wouldn't be shocked

  8. It's only a matter of days, or weeks. They may even cut him this week and then re-sign him to a smaller contract. As soon as TJ is ready, TT is a goner.

     

    i hope so - if he's on the roster from day one as a vested vet his salary is guaranteed, which makes it quite obviously a massive waste of cap space that would be better spent on extensions for key young core players

×
×
  • Create New...