tonydiamond

Why bother even arguing this topic? If we don't have a QB that can get the receivers the ball, why even waste your breath? Why, because Schopp and Bulldog are tired of hearing that argument and now you are too? Once we get an O-line and a QB, then we can discuss the intricacies of our WRs. I'd invite you to discuss another topic, such as the draft, but you're probably the same person who wants to draft Tim Tebow ( why did I say his name? ). Charles Barkley would've have been funnier if he'd made fun of the fans instead of the team.

FCS! We are not drafting Tebow and we are running the 3-4, now on to the next useless topic.

Seriously? No one drinks bong water. And I propose that we shelf the "put down the _____ pipe/bong" jokes. Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaawn.

Why do they even let people post this? As Papa would say,"Garrr-bage!"

Here I thought that that was a move that actually made sense. First QB on our roster that actually seemed intriguing since we had Doug Flutie. There is no way any QB was going to break into that line up in Green Bay, made sense that we took him. Green Bay also knew what we were up to, why do you think they tried to sign him? Crystal clear to me. Do you actually think we are going to take a QB in the first round? And if one more person says Tebow...We are not getting Tebow, Vick, Dungy, Schottenheimer, et al. I think we would be fools if we don't give BB a good look. He has to be better than what we got, maybe?

I have no idea why RF is starting. It was the defense that kept us in the games that he played. Man, if we had any resemblance of an offense... In any event, TE may still be feeling affects of the concusion, although I can't fully agree that DH should be starting. FCS, what happened to our football team...

I'm not sure if it's gun shy or the inability to put the ball into a tight spot but I watched the Giants-Saints game and those guys were threading needles. There were a few other highlights I saw QBs putting it in tight spaces and thought, "why don't we run those plays!" I was also surprised that this offense does not use motion, is that true? I'm going to watch some highlights...

Quinn is not a bad idea at all but I wonder what happened to him in Cleveland.

I agree, LT or DT it should be if our guy is there. I also agree on the fact that we need the LB help, it seems, quick, smart LBs are now the trendy pick. I guess I'd have no problem if our first three picks were defensive although, it might be freak out time if we got to round 5 and hadn't picked a QB yet. I am no expert by any means but I am skeptical, if not opposed to drafting a QB in the first round. I'm already weary of all the Tebow talk, no disrespect to his resume but he is definitely not the answer here. FCS, what happened to our beloved football team? I enjoyed the mock draft, thanks for posting it.

Johnson needs to be in the line up, he's proved that, I say we pull the trigger on Roscoe now. Let's send him to Cleveland, he practically played for them yesterday. Just kidding, but we could always use a few more picks in next year's draft for the new head coach. As far as Brooks or Runyan, I'm still skeptical, if I had to pick I'd say Brooks. Let the O-line stay intact for longer than ten minutes...

Do you think they have seen Maybin at LB in practice? He might make more plays with more room to operate. He seems to have disappeared like cheap beer at a crowded party so far.

DJ has to stay our coach this year, any resemblance of a turn-around this season would mess up our draft order next April. I'm surprised there hasn't been 14 threads started already about who we are going to draft.

Check the burn pile in Thurman's backyard.