AF88Bills

In my opinion, this interview is more reason to not like Darelle Revis and the Jets. Mike Francesa claims Revis committed pass interference on B Marshall. Instead of simply disagreeing, or standing up for himself, Revis basically says unless you play football, you have no right to make judgments about things that happen on the field. It gets heated at the 4:30 mark. http://web.yesnetwork.com/media/video.jsp?topic_id=5870056 I really hope the Bills destroy them.

keith ellison may make an average safety in this year's roster. Sad when you look at the D line from two years ago and Aaron Maybin is on there...listed at 240lbs, but lucky to be 225.

I remember coming into to last season, the FO braintrust wanted to get bigger. Watching yesterday's game and seeing beasts like Moats, Carrington, Merriman, Darius, Hairston, Urbik, Scott Chandler, and others made me realize that we are a heck of lot bigger than previous years. Even our receivers seem bigger. I think this is showing up in the form of physical dominance and is translated into wins. I'd just like to say it's nice seeing a vision start to play out for our team.

It's a long season. I'll say they're on the brink after we beat them twice

Continue building young talent....not get older. We are perilously thin on the O line, with our TEs, and could also use some more pass rush....too many areas that need addressing before getting an older CB

I'll be watching from the Transit Center at Manas...Kyrgzy Republic. North of Afghanistan. It's the Armed Forces Network game of the week.

+1

Yep, I saw that. It will be 2300hrs here in Kyrgzystan....gonna be a late night, but hopefully worth it

I agree, it's all conjecture now with who they could've picked ... The point is, I don't understand their self identified inflexibility when clearly are opportunities to be had...others teams do it and are often successful.

OK, two solid prospect OTs and a QB, just scratched like that...hmmm. Even with Fitz, aren't these considered issues for the Bills? Funny thing is winning organizations took these guys. (Colts, Steelers, and Pats)

well, take the premise that a higher pick increases your CHANCES of getting a successful player..shouldn't more pics do the same thing (increase your CHANCES for success)...especially considering how so many high draft picks flame out.

Positions of need: Ryan Mallet, Kyle Rudolph, Daquan Bowers (DE), Stephen Paea(DT), Marcus Golbert (OT),Benjamin Ijalana (OT)

in a perfect world a guy picked at 34 would be better than a guy picked at 40...but that's not the case. Otherwise Maybin would be pretty damn good. Sometimes good deals come along simply for trading down. Obviously, the farther you trade down, the better the deal should be. The Bills could've traded down to the bottom half of rd two and still had its pick of some high end guys.

how about the CB...would you say that was our biggest need. we could've traded (according to the report), and possibly still picked up an impact ILB, OT, QB, or even another D lineman....plus the extra pick or two depending on the trade. no. I think it's one reason they've been bad for so long. they don't get enough value from their drafts. don't get me wrong, I like a number of their picks (Dareus and Sheppard). I would like to see them make more out of the draft...I don't think they are.

I don't think that it's a way to build thru one or two drafts. there is no such thing as a "sure fire" guy in the draft. even if they didn't trade away their 1st rdr, there was plenty of value later in the second they could've had...this team still needs depth, and skill at ILB, OLB, QB, and OT. If teams are offering a decent swap in the second round for example, there was still plenty of value left for them to drop down. the good teams are able to make these trades. the problem is the bills have always like "their guy"...it's killed us when they've moved up for guys like Losman, McCargo, or reached for McGahee. this inflexibility doesn't pay off when there are smart opportunities to move down.