gjv
-
Posts
292 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by gjv
-
-
From my perspective, Worthy, who most had rated a second-round pick, would have been drafted by the Chiefs at 32. Beane's trade didn't impact the Chief's selection of Worthy but did prevent KC from drafting at 95 and did allow us to select Dwayne Carter at 95. I'd say Beane's move to trade with KC was a draft-day no-brainer.
-
2
-
-
3 hours ago, harmonkillebrew said:
Beane has a real tendency for a certain type of player.
Ray Davis is a Zack Moss clone
Coleman isn't too far off from Kelvin Benjamin and Devin Funchess.
None of those guys panned out.
Seems Beane consistently under values speed in skill players. I was hoping we'd come out of this draft faster and more explosive on O, but instead it's more of the usual.
Coleman would have been a decent replacement for Gabe. Similar skill set. Is Samuel supposed to be the Diggs replacement? Hard to see us being better on offense.
Or defense for that matter. They don't seem to have a vision or plan for getting better than the Chiefs. Feels like a reset year.
Coleman is more like Mike Evans.
-
I think the best comparable to Coleman is Mike Evans.
-
Bills drafted a better version of Mike Evans.
-
2
-
-
9 hours ago, Charles Romes said:
Rather have the new Harold Carmichael
I would say we have the new Mike Evans.
-
Cooper Dejean and Johnny Newton are still on the board. Both of these players have 1st round grades on them. Either one would be an excellent addition to the Bills roster.
-
I'm hoping if the Bills move up into the 20s, it's for Jared Verse.
-
I have concerns that Legette will have difficulty getting separation in the NFL. To me, he's a field stretcher worthy of a third-round selection.
-
1
-
-
I've watched Jayden Daniels many times this past season, and have also watched Lemar Jackson many times over the past six years. I think Daniels has a better release, more velocity, and is far more accurate than Lemar Jackson. I believe Daniels has a very good chance of being a franchise quarterback.
-
2
-
-
Bills send picks 28, 128, 144, and 163 to Pittsburg for pick no.20. With that pick the Bills select Byron Murphy.
-
What I'm hoping is that a WRer that is at the top of the Bills Draft Board is available to Beane either at 28 or 60 or at a move-up draft position that does not cost them a No. 2 pick. What I don't want is for Beane to reach for a WRer in rounds one and two, just to appease the knuckleheads that are WRer or Bust.
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
-
I think Beane and company realized they needed to rebuild the team. The old team got within 13 seconds of making the SB, and appeared last season to be fizzling out. Right now the roster is not as good as last year. But Beane has a lot of time th change that.
-
1
-
-
Benson is a true three down back. Have seen him play many times. He's good enough to build your offense around him. Similar to Cleveland's Chubb.
-
1
-
-
Joe Douglas is doing an excellent job of putting together a playoff roster. I wonder if Robert Saleh is capable of utilizing it.
-
1
-
-
38 minutes ago, H2o said:
So you think it's smart to parlay multiple draft picks to move up for a 3-Tech DT when we already have a one of the better STARTING 3-Tech DT's in the NFL? One that we are paying $17M a year for at the present moment. You're talking about a guy that plays a position we already have filled for 60% or more of the defensive snaps per game. But you want to trade up for a guy in the 1st Round who will likely play 40% of the time? It just isn't smart roster management.
40% of snaps on defense is significant. Having high quality DT3 play on every D-snap is smart. Especially if you can get those snaps on a rookie contract.
-
9 minutes ago, H2o said:
We can grab a rotational guy in the middle rounds if need be, or in the later waves of FA. But you don't trade up for a 3-Tech DT in the 1st Round when you have one of the better 3-Tech DT's in the NFL as your starter, and under contract through the 2027 season. It's just not good business considering where this team's needs truly lie.
Certainly, you can grab an inexpensive DT3 to fill the rotation. But does that make your team better? Teams win at the line of scrimmage. Lack of pressure up the middle and stopping the run has hurt the Bills over the last 4 seasons.
-
14 hours ago, H2o said:
I have to disagree with this one my friend. This would implode TSW. A trade up for a 3-Tech when we have Ed Oliver already?
Who do we have in the 3t rotation behind Oliver, nobody. In 5 years when we have to resign our 3t, Oliver will be retiring.
-
Hoping Bills move up for either Murphy or Newton, whoever falls the furthest.
-
The question needs to be "Are we improving our roster". Let's face it, if we want to get to the Super Bowl our roster has to improve, not remain at the same level.
-
I would take Ricky Pearsall, Florida, over Franklin.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Other than my concerns with, not having starting caliber safeties, nothing behind Oliver and Jones at DT, no one on the Edge with a threatening pass rush, downgrade at LG, and maybe at C also, I'm feeling pretty good about the Bills. I think this year, the Bill's coaching staff will have to do an outstanding job of coaching and strategy to put a product on the field that makes the playoffs.
-
If Laiatu Latu DE UCLA falls that far, I would hope Beane moves up for him.
-
1
-
-
Marvin needs to pull an Eli and demand a trade to only Buffalo.
-
From my perspective, we need two starting-caliber safeties and two DT's, a (1) and a (3), that can play 45% of the snaps at a starting DT level. While we are at it, how about a starting-caliber LG.
Seems like the Bills are building a WRer room full of large hardnose WRer's that can block.
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
Bills just added another large receiver Chris Claypool to a room of Coleman, Shavers, Hollis, and Shorter. It makes me think that McDermott and Brady are thinking about expanding on their 52% run vs pass.