Jump to content

The_Dude

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,110
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by The_Dude

  1. 1 minute ago, IndyMark said:

    I am fairly confident I did not make the assertion all is well in America. Clearly, it is not.  However, it is not multicultural thought that is the issue, it is separist thought or supremacy thought.  Do you not agree? 

     

    Look at this douche correcting people on grammar and using 2 spaces after a period. Usually that’s indicative of age. Typewriters. 

     

    But i I love that douche tactic. ‘Ah, you forgot an apostrophe which clearly means everything you say is wrong.’ There’s not enough salt in the world for those kinda snails.  

  2. 1 minute ago, IndyMark said:

    For all that is good, it is LOATHE.  And it is YOU'RE.  I feel I will tire of protecting you from yourself.  I thought you were done with me?  Also, the poster I was replying to was arguing that multiculturalism was the cause of current issues and events.  I simply offered an alternate thought.  My apologies for trying to have a discourse on this.  You are right.  Is this better?

     

    PS- I just noticed, I believe you meant to say "much", I am too much of a $#@!&^% to debate with....."; corrrect?

     

    Well I wrote this driving so I’m not looking at my phone. Gotta keep eyes on the road. But it’s imprtanylt for you to know you’re a douche. Your points are all *****. 

  3. 10 minutes ago, IndyMark said:

    Time.  I know you did not state otherwise, but I speculate others would overlook the fact there was absolutely balkanization in the US when the Irish, Italians, Polish, etc.....were coming to America.  And with time, assimilation (to an extent) occurred.  But there absolutely was balkanization then....it was not a smooth immigration process as the US became "diverse" [at the time what would be diverse]....and it never was a true assimilation, per se.  Difference in religions (if one observes a religion) were in existence then and still evident today....among other elements.  Multiculturalism is not the issue (do you really have an issue with the Polynesian culture of Hawaii, for example?) it is separists and supremists (I inititally thought isolationists, but technically that would not be correct) that are the issue that are causing these false fears of others who are different.  This is why I implied that ignorance is truly the activator of violence.  That and fear.  I appreciate your reply.

     

    Youre a *****ingjackass and I loath your writing style. America is not an example of multiculturalism. I mean you could argue the colonies were, but not America. But you’re too mush of a knowitallcunt to debate with so good day. 

  4. 5 minutes ago, IndyMark said:

     

    I knew you were provoking the readership here!  There was just no way anyone could type what you do with a straight face.  Also, just to help you a bit, an undergraduate degree does not make you a scholar....but you knew that.  Well done, you got me there.

     

    My library makes me a scholar. Your “point” on America makes you a dumbass. Good day. 

  5. 2 minutes ago, IndyMark said:

     

    You are no warrior or scholar; a fool certainly, a snowflake most clearly.  You should probably learn a bit of history about the US......and how mixing ethnic groups, you know, created our country.  Part of me thinks you are a provokateur, and you do not actually believe anything you type, correct? 

     

    Im a combat vet and I have an undergrad in history. But cool post. 

  6. 13 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

    Authoritarian governments, and wannabe authoritarians,  are pushing this stuff. Literally, right after Trump said he felt bad about the anti-immigrant terror attack he started in on scapegoating immigrants again. 

     

    How/why did this happen if diversity is awesome? Because liberals tell me it’s such a great idea to mix religions, ethnicities, languages and so on. Just dump it all in a bucket and watch the awesome happen. That’s how it works, right?

    • Haha (+1) 1
  7. 13 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

    This is why you can't get anywhere with the point you attempt to make. No matter how wise your point could be you contaminate it withshitlikethis.

     

     

    It is a sport. It has always been a sport. And it’s continually become more and more mentally demanding. Just because you don’t know what I mean don’t make me wrong. If you’d like to argue then we’ll have to go back to the Bronze Age and move forward to the Greek games and the the phalanx and then the maniple system, the Marian reforms, and then were just pulling a lot of strings. But it is a sport and I was good at it and I enjoy things I’m good at. Sorry. 

  8. 3 minutes ago, Paulus said:

    1552646776744.png

    Honestly, this board has so little clue what the rest of the world is like. One reason why The_Dude is so blasted is because of his lack of ignorance, IMO. I doubt many of you have come out of the Ivory Tower you lived in, comparatively speaking.

     

    That said, I got you...

    wkUtbHyjDajjKUHVbjiPXQ-GgKqJMb_T-Fvz3QEk

     

     

    Thank you. And the person who wrote that memo is spot on. I condem the gunmen. This is what coexistence brings. 104 years ago diversity created WWI. This is a Pandora’s box. 

    1 minute ago, row_33 said:

    Living in Canada, where most people think we are too civilized to have this happen, i see the events in Norway and New Zealand and think we're next.... :(

     

     

     

    I make fun of Canada a lot but man do they produce kickass troops. Their troops in WWI were top notch. 

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  9. 16 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

    You are not wrong in discussing whether or not we (all other religions) can exist with Muslims. That would be a good topic. What isn't needed is to bring up your hatred and longing to return to the battlefield in order to kill "Haj" in that conversation. Use your head.

     

    Its kinda hard for me to drop the hatred thing. A bit hard. I kind of have some “grievances.” But I agree with you. You’re not wrong. 

  10. 1 minute ago, Azalin said:

     

    Way to miss the point, oh perceptive one. I'm not hung up on you using the word "Haj" to refer to all Muslims (although that's still pretty ignorant). What I am pointing out is how you can somehow turn a thread about the cold-blooded murder of innocent people into yet another critique of all things Muslim. 

     

    I am NOT doing that. What I stated in this thread is that we clearly can’t coexist. There’s only about 1500 years of history in my corner. Maybe we need to let it ride longer and let the list of people killed by terrorists (on and of each side) grow longer? But what im saying is there will only be more of this if we don’t make a radical change. Am I wrong?

  11. 11 minutes ago, Azalin said:

     

    I'll tell you why you're wrong. You're once again going off on "Haj" like you always do, but this time you're doing so in a discussion about 49 innocent Muslims being murdered simply because they're Muslims. If you can't understand why people might take offense at that, then you're beyond ignorant. 

     

    ?

     

    Why do I use that word? Know what word we used to say ‘Iraqi civilian,’ ‘Iraqi combatant,’ or ‘Iranian’ on the radio? We just used “Haj.” “We” as in soldiers and marines. It was expedient and useful. I don’t care if you have a problem with it. Im kinda set in my ways. Institutionalized if you will. If that offends you, sir, then I’m offended by your offense to a term designed to maintain some sort of psychological protection for service members in theater. Because a soldier feels much better about killing “Haj” than he does a “person.” And to me, I’ll always use that word because it’s what I used since 19. Sorry for kicking ass for my country. 

  12. 21 minutes ago, bilzfancy said:

    We felt the same way about the Viet Cong, it was either you or them, I had no sympathy for them, and I'll bet WW2 vets felt that way about the Japanese too

     

    Thats why I use the term “haj/haji.” I’m not killing a “person,” I’m just killing “Haj.” Most people don’t understand the psychological necessity to dehumanize your enemy. I’m sure I’d hate Asians if I were in Nam, Korea, or the pacific during WWII. 

  13. 4 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

     

    Saying things such as, "I like killing Haj!" and "killing Haj is fun!" is not sarcasm. It's ***** disgusting. That's what people have a problem with.

     

    Forgive me, but I would think that you’d be able to understand I’m not referring to innocents. I mean, I figured you’d be able to understand I mean ‘Haj that’s trying to kill me.’ I’m not advocating for the slaughter of innocent people. Jesus.

     

    And for the record, I used the least amount of force necessary. And as soon as I took a prisoner, I wouldn’t be gentle with them per se, but the first thing I would do is safeguard them and provide them with water and food. Because that’s what I do. I’m a custodian of western civilization. That’s what I do. 

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...