flanspikes Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 6'6 cheap young WR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeF Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 What happened after his promising first year? http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/493015 Comment: Moore is tall, athletic. He has enough short-area quickness to separate off the line. He is a big target who can be highly effective in the red zone. He has solid catching skills, good leaping ability and can extend to catch the ball away from his frame. He has deceptive vertical speed. He is an above-average route runner and has good downfield setup. He has some cutting ability and is savvy enough to work into open areas. But Moore is lean and regressed as a player in 2005. He lacks functional play strength and sometimes struggles to get a good upfield release. He isn't very explosive and can be rerouted by physical cover 2 cornerbacks. He is more natural on inside cuts than outside cuts. He has to really lower his hips to create separation on outside routes. He isn't very explosive or elusive in open space. He isn't a physical or consistent run blocker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willis da illest Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 We need someone to go up top to....I'd get him if he's cheap for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanspikes Posted March 8, 2007 Author Share Posted March 8, 2007 What happened after his promising first year? http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/493015 IDK he wasnt used we need a big buy and a red zone target!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-Gun10 Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 We need someone to go up top to....I'd get him if he's cheap for sure. ya but who would u bump out of the rotation at wideout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanspikes Posted March 8, 2007 Author Share Posted March 8, 2007 ya but who would u bump out of the rotation at wideout. He would be situational maybe josh reed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROCCEO Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 I think this could be a good idea. I think wed have to compensate them though, right? but itd bve like a 6th rounder. Id rather draft one of these new young big guys if we have a shot at one of them in the 2nd or 3rd and other needs have been filled already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts