ieatcrayonz Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 Link Internet Islamists on the hunt Michelle Malkin February 23, 2006 8:14 AM Categories: World News [Editor’s Note: Michelle Malkin is experiencing problems with her weblog after being the target of cyberattacks. While they last, Pajamas Media will host her posts here] The cyberjihad continues. Zone-H, which monitors Internet hackers, reports that “the Moroccan hacker known as Yanis was arrested” in Paris on Tuesday: Yanis is accused of having defaced several French important websites (university of Strasbourg and Toulouse, website of the city of Lyon etc..), but his activity as defacer is far more complex: Zone-h, the independent observatory of cyber-crime, have monitored nearly 3000 notifications of intrusions in the last month related to the Prophet Mohammed digital Ummah protest (about 710 are by Yanis) while in his whole illegal “carreer” he compromised 1161 websites. Besides, Zone-h highlighted that the attacks pursued by Islamic hackers have noticeably increased after the spreading out of the Prophet Mohammed cartoons issue, and many defacements, like those by Yanis, clearly show, sometimes violently and offensively, their blame for Danish and more generally Western attitude. Relating to this point, the French magistrate charged a heavy count of indictment on Yanis, who is accused of “Apology of war crime and incitation to racial hate”, because of his hacking activity on Danish websites. The accusation focuses on his commitment in the boycott campaign against Danish products. After receiving several threats and experiencing one denial of service attack upon appearing on Fox News Channel to display the Mohammed Cartoons, my site went down again this morning at approx. 9am EST and remains down. My last post on the cyberjihad is cached here. MichelleMalkin.com I’ll be posting here at Pajamas Media until my blog is up and running again. UPDATE. It’s a confirmed DoS attack, with most of the IP addresses from turktelecom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbh10128 Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 Link Internet Islamists on the hunt Michelle Malkin February 23, 2006 8:14 AM Categories: World News [Editor’s Note: Michelle Malkin is experiencing problems with her weblog after being the target of cyberattacks. While they last, Pajamas Media will host her posts here] The cyberjihad continues. Zone-H, which monitors Internet hackers, reports that “the Moroccan hacker known as Yanis was arrested” in Paris on Tuesday: Yanis is accused of having defaced several French important websites (university of Strasbourg and Toulouse, website of the city of Lyon etc..), but his activity as defacer is far more complex: Zone-h, the independent observatory of cyber-crime, have monitored nearly 3000 notifications of intrusions in the last month related to the Prophet Mohammed digital Ummah protest (about 710 are by Yanis) while in his whole illegal “carreer” he compromised 1161 websites. Besides, Zone-h highlighted that the attacks pursued by Islamic hackers have noticeably increased after the spreading out of the Prophet Mohammed cartoons issue, and many defacements, like those by Yanis, clearly show, sometimes violently and offensively, their blame for Danish and more generally Western attitude. Relating to this point, the French magistrate charged a heavy count of indictment on Yanis, who is accused of “Apology of war crime and incitation to racial hate”, because of his hacking activity on Danish websites. The accusation focuses on his commitment in the boycott campaign against Danish products. After receiving several threats and experiencing one denial of service attack upon appearing on Fox News Channel to display the Mohammed Cartoons, my site went down again this morning at approx. 9am EST and remains down. My last post on the cyberjihad is cached here. MichelleMalkin.com I’ll be posting here at Pajamas Media until my blog is up and running again. UPDATE. It’s a confirmed DoS attack, with most of the IP addresses from turktelecom. 611879[/snapback] the US government should shut down michelle malkin anyway. she's another talking head for the radical neocon interests that got us into the whole iraq mess in the first place, and seeks to ensare us in even more wars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverNRed Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 the US government should shut down michelle malkin anyway. she's another talking head for the radical neocon interests that got us into the whole iraq mess in the first place, and seeks to ensare us in even more wars 611994[/snapback] Yes. Free speech is stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X. Benedict Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 Yes. Free speech is stupid. 611998[/snapback] In principle or application? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbh10128 Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 Yes. Free speech is stupid. 611998[/snapback] "hate speech" and "inciting violence" not protected by free speech laws. as a matter fact many things are not. another example is revealing state secrets like what scooter libby did when he revealed the identity of an under cover CIA agent. libby and malkin are both members of the neocon clique behind the blatant lies that triggered the deaths of something like 60,000 people so far in iraq. if thats not "hate speech" and "inciting violence" what is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 How did this thread ever escape the clutches of PPP? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 How did this thread ever escape the clutches of PPP? 612041[/snapback] See what you went and did? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASCI Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 "hate speech" not protected by free speech laws. yes it is, You’re getting us confused with Canada. KKK and the like can say anything they want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 "hate speech" and "inciting violence" not protected by free speech laws. as a matter fact many things are not. another example is revealing state secrets like what scooter libby did when he revealed the identity of an under cover CIA agent. libby and malkin are both members of the neocon clique behind the blatant lies that triggered the deaths of something like 60,000 people so far in iraq. if thats not "hate speech" and "inciting violence" what is? 612038[/snapback] I know I told you that typing in caps wouldn't make people take you seriously. But not typing in caps won't make people take you seriously either. Content does count for something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 See what you went and did? 612045[/snapback] Beetlejuice. Beetlejuice. Beetlejuice... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverNRed Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 I know I told you that typing in caps wouldn't make people take you seriously. But not typing in caps won't make people take you seriously either. Content does count for something. 612048[/snapback] His posts read like a parody of actual liberal viewpoints. I don't even know where to start. Any chance this guy is plant from Karl Rove meant to make liberals look stupid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X. Benedict Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 His posts read like a parody of actual liberal viewpoints. I don't even know where to start. Any chance this guy is plant from Karl Rove meant to make liberals look stupid? 612055[/snapback] I thought he was a plant from the NEA to convince America that more money needs to be spent on education. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 Any chance this guy is plant from Karl Rove meant to make liberals look stupid? 612055[/snapback] Can't be. Not when they've still got Cindy Sheehan as a standard-bearer. Maybe when he gets to "get the military out of occupied New Orleans" levels, the theory will have something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 "hate speech" and "inciting violence" not protected by free speech laws. as a matter fact many things are not. another example is revealing state secrets like what scooter libby did when he revealed the identity of an under cover CIA agent. libby and malkin are both members of the neocon clique behind the blatant lies that triggered the deaths of something like 60,000 people so far in iraq. if thats not "hate speech" and "inciting violence" what is? 612038[/snapback] Why did I have a flash vision of either a North Korean or Iranian political figure when I read this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbh10128 Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 His posts read like a parody of actual liberal viewpoints. I don't even know where to start. Any chance this guy is plant from Karl Rove meant to make liberals look stupid? 612055[/snapback] ever try answering a substantive post with a substantive post? name calling and sarcasm speaks to the weakness of your argument Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 ever try answering a substantive post with a substantive post? name calling and sarcasm speaks to the weakness of your argument 612093[/snapback] the US government should shut down michelle malkin anyway. she's another talking head for the radical neocon interests that got us into the whole iraq mess in the first place, and seeks to ensare us in even more wars Define "substantive"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbh10128 Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 Define "substantive"? 612106[/snapback] substantive adj 1: being the essence or essential element of a thing; "substantial equivalents"; "substantive information" [syn: substantial, in essence] 2: applying to essential legal principles and rules of right; "substantive law" [syn: essential] [ant: adjective] 3: having substance and prompting thought; "a meaty discussion" [syn: meaty] n : a noun or a pronoun that is used in place of a noun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 substantive adj 1: being the essence or essential element of a thing; "substantial equivalents"; "substantive information" [syn: substantial, in essence] 2: applying to essential legal principles and rules of right; "substantive law" [syn: essential] [ant: adjective] 3: having substance and prompting thought; "a meaty discussion" [syn: meaty] n : a noun or a pronoun that is used in place of a noun 612116[/snapback] Thank you. That's what I thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pdh1 Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 nt. libby and malkin are both members of the neocon clique behind the blatant lies that triggered the deaths of something like 60,000 people so far in iraq. if thats not "hate speech" and "inciting violence" what is? 612038[/snapback] You don't hold the terrorists from Syria and other places responsible for any of those deaths? You know, the charming folks who have blown up a car bomb next to kids getting candy, blown upthe U.N. and Red Cross headquartes in Iraq, etc, etc, etc...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverNRed Posted February 27, 2006 Share Posted February 27, 2006 ever try answering a substantive post with a substantive post? name calling and sarcasm speaks to the weakness of your argument 612093[/snapback] Ever try writing a substantive post? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts