Kultarr Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 Thurman Thomas belongs in the HoF and was one of the most dominant players in the history of the NFL. You lost me here. He was a great all purpose back, but this is way over the top. 597318[/snapback] We'll have to agree to disagree. I think Thurman Thomas was every bit as great a player as Barry and Emmitt. The NFL was blessed to have 3 great backs at the same time. Barry may get charity votes; Emmitt may have records and rings; but, Thurman was every bit as good. Just my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BackInDaDay Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 We'll have to agree to disagree. I think Thurman Thomas was every bit as great a player as Barry and Emmitt. The NFL was blessed to have 3 great backs at the same time. Barry may get charity votes; Emmitt may have records and rings; but, Thurman was every bit as good. Just my opinion. 597407[/snapback] I absolutely agree that he was 'every bit as good' as Smith, and as far as his value to an offense, I'd rather have him than Sanders. I was referring to the 'one of the most dominant players in the history of the NFL' statement. That's a helluva endorsement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts